Disliked{quote} This system works because the odds are on our side. Consider the probability of having all 9 losses in a row ! Now consider the chances that this repeats itself in the very next cycle of TS's. Then consider the probability of winning 2 trades out of 9 ! Often if you let a trade run on the PA might reverse and you get stopped out unless you close it early. A more complex or should I say a far more thought out TS Order 3 will have its advantages however, a higher TF works better most of the time ! The more you trade these setups the more interesting...Ignored
But I'm not talking about improve the formula because for me the risk is fine. I'm talking about how manage that small combinations are loss for try reduce more the risk.
If you have in 9 combination 7 winner and 2 loser we agree risk is very low. But 50/50% probabilites dont means you will get an uniform row of wins/losses. This is a big mistake when people like casino roulette black/red strategy. Martingale suffers same unbalance problem. Then have a favorable win ratio is one part of solution but the safest way is reduce loss probability to 0. Its impossible but closer to that number bigger probabilities to success in long term.
Anyway since you exposed your MM idea I agree the base is very good and that is reason I'm interesting in check all weaks. Because as coder I have that defect. I always search the problems for fix it because the strongs never are a problem in systems
Try don't lose pants never...