{quote} did you catch that 90 pip jump 30 min before that crash?
"The fun is in the hunt. Not the kill."
Higher Edge within a Single Candlestick
- #1,864
- Nov 28, 2017 4:18pm Nov 28, 2017 4:18pm
- Joined Jun 2006 | Status: Adios! | 3,377 Posts
Staying in my lane...
- #1,870
- Nov 29, 2017 2:29am Nov 29, 2017 2:29am
{quote} In this series of ohlc prices what info does it actually convey? In that series of data can you tell which "price" in that range of prices was valued most? In that series of data can you tell which "price" in that range of prices was valued least? Can you tell me which printed first? The High or the Low? There isn't any info in which to make a informed logical trading decision. OHLC conveys no info……………. {image} What is market generated info? Trading data from market activity organized to display both price and time In keeping with the original...
Can you also explain more about your text at another image : A person who uses barcharts to the best of their understanding given the data they work with ... I think the information given by a bar chart is similar to candle stick (having same OHLC information), but why do we choose bar chart instead of candle stick, and not just use line chart instead ??
And can you explain why there is a "A > B" there on another image ?
- #1,871
- Edited 11:57am Nov 29, 2017 11:44am | Edited 11:57am
- Joined Feb 2017 | Status: Trader | 1,365 Posts
"The fun is in the hunt. Not the kill."
- #1,872
- Nov 29, 2017 11:15pm Nov 29, 2017 11:15pm
- Joined May 2009 | Status: Trader | 1,879 Posts
{quote} Thank you for your explanation in a very effi cient way, mzvega. Can you give a clue why you define the 'value area upper' at 4702 (not at 4696) ? Most prices move are between 4680 - 4700, but the value area upper is bigger than that. Do you define it at 4702 based on looking it at lower TF, or because they must be always above the resisting price ?
AMVT doesn't use daily profiles for trading it uses the "daily data" it produces for analysis as variables. There is not enough data info in the intraday TF(daily) to determine the condition of the market. It is not a large enough sample to determine its overall condition . AMVT as evidence shows has a 3 day rule.
AMVT is not "market profile". They both use MGD. MP "methodology" is not used in AMVT. The confusion comes from the price*time format. All market generated data has a price* time format
While they obviously "look" the same (MGD format) the methods differ. Same data format, different methodologies (concepts of value) 70% "value area" is a MP intraday concept not supported by empirical evidence. In AMVT value is defined by a bracketing market…..
Anyway the bracket (value) limits are defined as the price at which the tpo's change from 3 to 2 or less
So if the data (tpo's) are distributed (bracketed) between 3 to 2 tpo's or less and the close is inside the distribution The condition is "bracketing". When the data is not bracketing the market is trending (not bracketing). The fact that the market is bracketing implies value (area). You can't define value/bracketing in moving markets.
It sounds complicated, but it's simplistic in nature. it is a simple quantitative measure. By breaking the data into units you can measure by the frequency of prices used over time to determine value. Where prices are use most and least, etc.. It is a simple quantitative measure , the market is either trending or not. There is no ambiguity, No bias involved.
AMVT does not trade changes in "price", or uses "price" to look/seek direction, nor does it predict. Trades are based on changes in condition/value. When the condition changes from bracketing(value) to not bracketing (trend). there is absolutely "No bias" , no "ambiguity" , no predicting involved. (objective) using frequency of prices used over time. Mathematically, it is, or it is not.
Can you also explain more about your text at another image : A person who uses barcharts to the best of their understanding given the data they work with ... I think the information given by a bar chart is similar to candle stick (having same OHLC information), but why do we choose bar chart instead of candle stick, and not just use line chart instead ??
I choose not to use either one. Using OHLC data is a "non permitted" practice in AMVT. They both are misrepresentative of price. AMVT there is no concept of TF's. If price was used in a 30m time period, the price is also used at the same price and at the same time in every other TF (candlestick interval). In AMVT there is no concept of "time frames". There is only a "price frame". Prices and how often those price are used over time. not "price at time" (candlesticks/bar charts)
https://www.forexfactory.com/showthr...91#post8986991
And can you explain why there is a "A > B" there on another image ?
Markets are not efficient, rather they are effective - Jones
- #1,876
- Dec 2, 2017 1:46am Dec 2, 2017 1:46am
- Joined Jun 2006 | Status: Adios! | 3,377 Posts
Staying in my lane...
- #1,878
- Dec 4, 2017 1:35pm Dec 4, 2017 1:35pm
- Joined Mar 2014 | Status: swimming with floaters and snorkels | 1,157 Posts
{quote} I don't avoid red news. I won't have an open trade run through a red news, unless I've made readjustments in very rare cases. Do you know how big banks work with blackboxes automated robots? They have the engineer/trader/coder/programmer/developer babysit the robot every second to watch for glitches and malfunctions. No robot is left alone. The human's job is to babysit the robot. Now a retail trader will go to sleep or walk away while the robot is working.My strategy/system won't fail when automated.... but it will have glitches...
Best,
k
