$3 to $10000 within 3 month (EA) fully automated | Page 3 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Automated trading - $100 to $10000 23 replies

Trapping System: Way to Fully-Automated Trading System 47 replies

Fully Automated Robot - Need Help 2 replies

YOUR results with live, fully-automated EAs?? 26 replies

History of Fully Automated Trading (black box) 15 replies

Attachments: $3 to $10000 within 3 month (EA) fully automated
Exit Attachments

$3 to $10000 within 3 month (EA) fully automated

  • #41
  • Sep 20, 2016 9:14pm Sep 20, 2016 9:14pm
Quoting MoneyZilla
Sharpy, i reconsidered the SL of 25 pips. The above example i gave you was with net 25 pips of SL. No spread. Now, you have said the spread of your broker is 8. Net 10 pipsof SL. Here are the numbers for that! Every single SL of those listed, will cost you AT LEAST 25 pips! That's without any commissions, swaps, slippages, high spead, ext. It is just question of time. It is not like, if this is going to happen, but more likely WHEN this is going to happen? I do not want to kill your enthusiasm, but that is what the numbers suggest for the conditions...
I understand you missed my SL area here it is I am using saprate SL for each trades it all limited to 25 pips so it never will loss more than TP as you said

Look attached image
Attached Image
  • #42
  • Sep 20, 2016 11:28pm Sep 20, 2016 11:28pm
Sharpy, i perfectly understand your approach. You do not need to share your strategy for us to understand on what it is based. For ANY strategy that has to catch a direction, having SLs is a must thing. That is all I need to know. The rest of the strategy might be full with uncertainties, but it is not important.

I am trying to help others as much as I can. Unfortunately, nobody listens. Forex is a game of SLs, not TPs as all enthusiasts here at FF are dreaming about. That is why the first thing I start with is to check how the SLs are affecting the expected performance, even I know nothing of a given strategy...

The success lies in how do you manage the SLs and WHERE do you place your enteries? There are massive zones, usually up to 150 pips wide, where only 1 mil account size can survive, eventually. Grid or anti-grid.

Not using martingale is something I solute you for. Also the BE thing is another very good idea. Bravo. No irony here. Good luck with your EA. Look around for the SLs, cause there it lies the beast...
Maadik Hugiis. IQ 69.
  • #43
  • Sep 20, 2016 11:48pm Sep 20, 2016 11:48pm
Well, quantity of SLs must not be greater than total amount of profit , algorithm behind this EA never allow to give less chance to get profit than loss

It use probability of winning ratio to close trades in profit than loss also it changes the direction of trade based on 'zone'
  • #44
  • Sep 21, 2016 2:33am Sep 21, 2016 2:33am
Quoting sharpshoot
Well, quantity of SLs must not be greater than total amount of profit , algorithm behind this EA never allow to give less chance to get profit than loss It use probability of winning ratio to close trades in profit than loss also it changes the direction of trade based on 'zone'
Unfortunately, for all of us (including Me, in the first place), the SLs are determined by the rate's behavior, not by the strategy being in use (regardless of how good the strategy is), Sharpy.

If you have jumped on any level of those I have showed to you with the most of the SLs (135.40/50/60) your probability winning ratio will be unhelpful, cause there are like 90 SLs on average for EACH of those three levels... Now picture this. 90 SLs, 25 pips each. Hmmm, interesting? And a single TP of 400 pips have not been reached yet (at the time of the screenshot was taken)?!?

Before declaring something to be successful, one is obliged to check what can destroy it, eventually. Which is the SLs in precise. And that is what NONE of the traders are doing, unfortunately. That is precisely why, there is just ONE profitable retail trader on every 10,000. Yes, that is right. 1 out of 10,000. This is the reality. Long term...

Have you been looking around for any durable and good EA made X years ago? Someone making profits regularly? Something that works? In a long term? Interesting results you will find...

I am leaving you here. No time for wasting anymore on this tread. Good luck.
Maadik Hugiis. IQ 69.
  • #45
  • Sep 21, 2016 2:56am Sep 21, 2016 2:56am
Quoting MoneyZilla
{quote} Unfortunately, for all of us (including Me, in the first place), the SLs are determined by the rate's behavior, not by the strategy being in use (regardless of how good the strategy is), Sharpy. If you have jumped on any level of those I have showed to you with the most of the SLs (135.40/50/60) your probability winning ratio will be unhelpful, cause there are like 90 SLs on average for EACH of those three levels... Now picture this. 90 SLs, 25 pips each. Hmmm, interesting? And a single TP of 400 pips have not been reached yet (at the time...
You are wasting time without knowing my strategy , you said my strategy will close 90 SLs with single 400 pips TP which is wrongly you understand my system

Even you had to analize where I used my TP and SL in my back test result I posted in my OP and try to understand how that test result got profit and tell me in what situation my EA will make loss

My EA will make loss only with the $3 investment very less chance to wipeout with $10 and more investment with $0.01 per pip brocker

If possible you talk about how simple anti grid strategy will make loss or look my above attached drawing and tell me how that grid will make loss.

If you think you are wasting time here then best of luck and wish you good days in trading.
  • #46
  • Sep 21, 2016 6:47am Sep 21, 2016 6:47am
Sharpy, backtesting is nothing, but a waste of time. If bt was to really work, everyone would have been rich already. All you need is ONE working EA, that works in bt perfectly, and you will stay rich till the end of the days. Is it so? Live trading has proven bt is nothing but a complete rubbish... I am sorry to disappoint you.

If you are serious about improving your system, just PM me. Otherwise - best of luck with your trading! I sincerely wish you that! No irony here! I hope you can make it.
Maadik Hugiis. IQ 69.
  • #47
  • Sep 21, 2016 7:15am Sep 21, 2016 7:15am
Quoting MoneyZilla
Sharpy, backtesting is nothing, but a waste of time. If bt was to really work, everyone would have been rich already. All you need is ONE working EA, that works in bt perfectly, and you will stay rich till the end of the days. Is it so? Live trading has proven bt is nothing but a complete rubbish... I am sorry to disappoint you. If you are serious about improving your system, just PM me. Otherwise - best of luck with your trading! I sincerely wish you that! No irony here! I hope you can make it.
I mean can you find mistake in my strategy from that my back test or you need 3 month forward test result to trust a system ? Then look at myfxbook profile there is many forward live accounts there I doubled with this strategy

This discussion is waste cause I cannot explain my complete strategy here it's difficult but I am selling it because I am finding serious traders to improve my system , as a experienced trder I know about SL and money management etc thank you for you remember me that

In 2000 about 16 years before I started share trading and in 2005 I started forex trading

I don't want to PM you to know something I already know so you can post here what is the wrong in my strategy or even what is wrong in anti grid / zone recovery etc I maintained in my OP which is my basics of strategy, surely it will helps everyone to get knowledge.
  • #48
  • Sep 21, 2016 3:29pm Sep 21, 2016 3:29pm
Sharpy, it is not about everyone. Here we have too many dumb idiots, looking for someone to tell them how to easily make money from trading. They are lazy to think it over. So, they will get nothing from Me.

The SLs have successfully killed all good strategies so far. The SLs have also killed many good traders meanwhile. Maybe you and your strategy are different from the crowd? Who knows?

Sharpy, no need to PM me anymore. You know it all, man! I can feel it! It is pitty you have missed a chance to get some knowledge how to detect the range zones and avoid the most heavy levels, that range that kills all grids and anti grids and NOT only that, the manual traders are losing money like crazy at those ranging times. Ask any broker. They will tell you what happens with the manual traders at tight range. I guess you already know what happens with the automatic traders at the same tight range - generally speaking they get close to God. Most of them discover the useless side of praying. But Forex seems to be more powerful than God is at this particular game and Forex moves away their hard earned money into the right pockets... Hey, it is your $3! You are going to make it up to $3 mil. At least. I am 100% sure this sounds REASONABLE!:-))))))))
Maadik Hugiis. IQ 69.
  • #49
  • Sep 21, 2016 7:29pm Sep 21, 2016 7:29pm
The OP is trolling us. LOL

Do you think, Citadel,which has the most sophisticated "EA" sells it source code???
NO
Why?
Because they make billions from it
  • #50
  • Sep 21, 2016 8:33pm Sep 21, 2016 8:33pm
Quoting timos
The OP is trolling us. LOL Do you think, Citadel,which has the most sophisticated "EA" sells it source code??? NO Why? Because they make billions from it
Don't worry sales will stop as soon as I was searching for serious feedback from those who use my EA but I was not ready to give it free of cost because it was made by my effort
  • #51
  • Jul 29, 2017 3:11am Jul 29, 2017 3:11am
Hello all I am again..

According to uncertainty theory nobody can predict anything perfectly but there is 50/50 winning ratio so we can bet like flip coin ... But decide what must be the return of investment ( ROI )

For example :

If you invest $10 in gambling and return is double then your profit is 100% but there is chance to loss that money you earned next time

So I recommend gamble but return must be huge so your account won't wipe out if loss number of times

Invest $3 and you loss 100 times will never happen you may win at least $1000 before you loss $300 it's called probability of success rate ...

My EA is the best tool to do it
  • #52
  • Aug 4, 2017 7:35am Aug 4, 2017 7:35am
Quoting sharpshoot
Hello all I am again.. According to uncertainty theory nobody can predict anything perfectly but there is 50/50 winning ratio so we can bet like flip coin ... But decide what must be the return of investment ( ROI ) For example : If you invest $10 in gambling and return is double then your profit is 100% but there is chance to loss that money you earned next time So I recommend gamble but return must be huge so your account won't wipe out if loss number of times Invest $3 and you loss 100 times will never happen you may win at least $1000 before...
This seems like a very interesting idea. Thanks for posting this. Do you have a Trade Explorer to show this with examples?

Can you explain what would be your initial lotsize entry? $3 would very quickly lost when the position goes even 3 pips against you even on a 0.1 lot size (not counting spreads, commission and slippage)
  • #53
  • Aug 4, 2017 9:11am Aug 4, 2017 9:11am
Dont waste your money! The title is misleading. The EA has very bad result!
  • #54
  • Aug 4, 2017 10:09am Aug 4, 2017 10:09am
Quoting mario777
Dont waste your money! The title is misleading. The EA has very bad result!
Thanks for the headsup!

I was skeptical as well. I mean if the EA could actually produce $1000 from $3, why would the OP be willing to sell it? I understand there could be other reason...but I have read nothing about those reasons in this thread!!

I will wait for the OP to provide some more explanation about the EA and what it could do....its limitations...what can be expected....etc
  • #55
  • Aug 5, 2017 1:30am Aug 5, 2017 1:30am
Quoting mario777
Dont waste your money! The title is misleading. The EA has very bad result!
You must use the EA after the news when market move 100+ pips without retrace , most of time it happen in market

You won't get huge profit like this without analysing market movements
  • #56
  • Aug 5, 2017 1:37am Aug 5, 2017 1:37am
Quoting yalgaar
{quote} This seems like a very interesting idea. Thanks for posting this. Do you have a Trade Explorer to show this with examples? Can you explain what would be your initial lotsize entry? $3 would very quickly lost when the position goes even 3 pips against you even on a 0.1 lot size (not counting spreads, commission and slippage)
It needs to down 30 pips to hit in SL if lot size is $0.01 per pip, This EA is working with semi anti grid method.
  • #57
  • Aug 5, 2017 7:52am Aug 5, 2017 7:52am
Quoting sharpshoot
{quote} It needs to down 30 pips to hit in SL if lot size is $0.01 per pip, This EA is working with semi anti grid method.
Can you please provide more details? Some of the events where the market actually moved 100 pips without retracement?

If you are using 0.01 lot size...you sure will need 30 pips against you to lose your $3 so it makes sense for this to handle a 30 pips loss. But I still don't understand how a 100 pip move will get you $1000 profit? even if this is without retracement?
  • #58
  • Aug 6, 2017 2:12pm Aug 6, 2017 2:12pm
Troll is back
  • #59
  • Aug 7, 2017 2:19am Aug 7, 2017 2:19am
Quoting yalgaar
{quote} Can you please provide more details? Some of the events where the market actually moved 100 pips without retracement? If you are using 0.01 lot size...you sure will need 30 pips against you to lose your $3 so it makes sense for this to handle a 30 pips loss. But I still don't understand how a 100 pip move will get you $1000 profit? even if this is without retracement?
This is what algorithm i used , EA will open new trades in every 3 pips same time EA will place BE in every first opened trades so when market move to 90 pips upside total open trades will be over 30 in quantities that means total lot size is equal to $0.90 cent per pip so first trade will get $0.90 + $0.87 + $0.84 .... total amount wil be more than $100 profit by started $3 with $0.01 per pips

this same can use $0.10 cent per pip can lead you to make $1000 profit but the SL risk is 30 pips ( $3 / 0.1 = 30 ) correct me above i said 30 but if its $0.01 per pip will get 300 pips risk free in SL
  • #60
  • Aug 7, 2017 7:20am Aug 7, 2017 7:20am
Quoting sharpshoot
{quote} This is what algorithm i used , EA will open new trades in every 3 pips same time EA will place BE in every first opened trades so when market move to 90 pips upside total open trades will be over 30 in quantities that means total lot size is equal to $0.90 cent per pip so first trade will get $0.90 + $0.87 + $0.84 .... total amount wil be more than $100 profit by started $3 with $0.01 per pips this same can use $0.10 cent per pip can lead you to make $1000 profit but the SL risk is 30 pips ( $3 / 0.1 = 30 ) correct me above i said 30 but...
Something really seems off in your explanation. I am not able to point it out. But this is what I understand so far. Let me know if I got this right.

For this example. I am going to use 0.1 as the lot size. Just for understanding we will assume 1 pip = $1

So you take a trade and keep taking up to total of 30 trades as the price keep moving 3 pip in your direction. You also keep moving your SL 3 pip so you reserve your profit.

So now if the price indeed moves 90 pips in your direction without any retrace (even of 3 pip) then you hit your following target:

1st position will make you 90 pips
2nd position will make you 87 pips
3rd position will make you 84 pips....
....
.....
basically a total about 1395 pips.

So basically you risked only $3 to make over $1000 pips....is this correct?

Now if I got this right...I wonder about the following:

1) I highly doubt market moves 90 pips without retrace of even 3 pips. As per the strategy if it even retraces 3 pips. We are done. So you will not reach your target.
2) If my above statement is not true can you give example with dates and currency pairs where it moves 90 pips without a retrace.
3) Your thread says $3 to $10000. But in this example we saw $3 to $1000. Is there a typo about an extra 0 ? I also noticed you mentioned 3 months. How does that 3 months play into this whole thing?
4) How much are you charging for your EA? Can you provide screenshots of the trades that your EA has taken? How many trades does the EA find per week?
0 traders viewing now