CCFp weekly signals (set and forget basket trading) | Page 477 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

BASKET TRADE Management: Using multiple trade management EA's on basket trades 11 replies

Basket Knights - A Basket Trading Round Table 1,313 replies

Updated CCFp and CFP indis for relative strength trading 55 replies

TMS basket: Dashboard for a basket of MA-Filtered RSI Signals 135 replies

Set it & Forget it GBP and CHF signals... 6 replies

Attachments: CCFp weekly signals (set and forget basket trading)
Exit Attachments

CCFp weekly signals (set and forget basket trading)

  • #9,521
  • Jul 25, 2017 10:01pm Jul 25, 2017 10:01pm
Quoting Li0n21
Monthly signals are still going strong.. I will close them on thursday. These are all live. {image}
I don't need all you settings nor your account information...lol. I would however like to know what your max DD was?

One day I will join the club.......

Attached Image
  • #9,522
  • Jul 25, 2017 10:11pm Jul 25, 2017 10:11pm
Quoting lghr
{quote} Congratulate to you. How much is the max drawdown, and which day you open that orders ? and all your set ? Could you share it ? Thank you.
Max draw down was ~3800 pips = $380. All baskets opened July 5 (because of the weekend and the US holiday on July 4th)
#moneyteam - on a million dollar mission. Don't tell me I can't - I can
  • #9,523
  • Jul 25, 2017 10:25pm Jul 25, 2017 10:25pm
Quoting Li0n21
{quote} Max draw down was ~3800 pips = $380. All baskets opened July 5 (because of the weekend and the US holiday on July 4th)
Thank you very much sharing. Your DD is very low, 4220/380 ~= 11.11. Amazing ! ! !
  • #9,524
  • Jul 25, 2017 10:35pm Jul 25, 2017 10:35pm
Quoting Li0n21
Monthly signals are still going strong.. I will close them on thursday. These are all live. {image}
hi Li0n21

my monthly ccfp also all live and on-going ..
why you choose close them on Thursday ? no on Friday or today ?
  • #9,525
  • Jul 25, 2017 11:10pm Jul 25, 2017 11:10pm
lots =0.01, PF =4220, orders =250; average PF: 4220/250 = 16.88.

PF/loss ~= 11.11.

total pip =22436, average pip: 22436/250 ~=90.

very good ! thanks to Li0n21 !
  • #9,526
  • Jul 25, 2017 11:59pm Jul 25, 2017 11:59pm
Quoting Li0n21
" ... Weekly isn't all that great...... Make money and sleep well.
Speak for your self LOL
My $2000 count that started back a couple of months ago is at 250% , despite having a -10% this week .
So , keep those ideas to yerself..

Like I posted in the first couple of pages. This approach is a gold mine. The rules are simple and all ya gotta do is add your own MM and yer set.

Jess
Our AWESOME IMAGINATION is the true holy grail!
  • #9,527
  • Jul 26, 2017 12:02am Jul 26, 2017 12:02am
Quoting jenbols
{quote} yes thank you very clear what you said ,,, there was no need to try with template as the Gbpnzd disappeared on daily so as the current GbpNzd was a sell i assume that it was taken as a sale on the weekly Tf when the list formed this morning and the the daily displayed its GpbNzd as a buy only later on.. it disappears and appears randomly anyway ..could be ranging BUt i guess we can all admit that this rule about making a pair of the ccfp-df list disappear because it's opposite it is not really the ultimate and best thing to do _ Opposite...
Jens:
Like I have mentioned before the requester did not think about this situation. So it was not a well thought out requirement. The idea then is that the user must only be interested in what happens when the real basket is opened. After that you don't care what the ccfp-diff produces, you only care of the status of the real basket.

So if the user has that in mind, then you can say it is a valid approach.
Our AWESOME IMAGINATION is the true holy grail!
  • #9,528
  • Jul 26, 2017 12:02am Jul 26, 2017 12:02am
Quoting oocat0227
{quote} hi Li0n21 my monthly ccfp also all live and on-going .. why you choose close them on Thursday ? no on Friday or today ?
maybe because USD FOMC Meetings today. USD Unemployment Thursday. CAD GDP and USD Advanced GDP both on Friday. Probably not a bad idea to wrap things up with a good profit.
  • #9,529
  • Jul 26, 2017 1:29am Jul 26, 2017 1:29am
Why we do not directly use MA to trade ?

Timeframe = 43200;
MA_Method = 3;
Price = 6;
Fast = 3;
Slow = 5;
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: EURGBPMonthly.png Size: 31 KB
  • #9,530
  • Jul 26, 2017 1:51am Jul 26, 2017 1:51am
Quoting lghr
Why we do not directly use MA to trade ? Timeframe = 43200; MA_Method = 3; Price = 6; Fast = 3; Slow = 5; {image}
You are no longer trading the strength of the currencies (what we are discussing in this thread) ... but trading the basic cross of 2 MAs on the current symbol.
MT4/MT5 EAs/Indicators/Alerts coder
  • #9,531
  • Jul 26, 2017 1:55am Jul 26, 2017 1:55am
Quoting FerruFx
{quote} You are no longer trading the strength of the currencies (what we are discussing in this thread) ... but trading the basic cross of 2 MAs on the current symbol.
I see, thank you reply.
  • #9,532
  • Jul 26, 2017 1:56am Jul 26, 2017 1:56am
Quoting lghr
{quote} I see, thank you reply.
MT4/MT5 EAs/Indicators/Alerts coder
  • #9,533
  • Jul 26, 2017 2:24am Jul 26, 2017 2:24am
Quoting jauhar
{quote} Also I noticed that CCFp monthly signals are more consistent than other time frames. One reason could be the bug in the ma function of CCFp. As the bug (if any) does not effect the monthly time frame, but it does effect all other time frames.
It's a false feeling. Problem is same than lower TFs. Only difference is you are delaying the problem more time if you took the trend in the bottom. It's a swing problem. Higher TF higher DD when happens. The solution is hard and not successful at all
Try don't lose pants never...
  • #9,534
  • Jul 26, 2017 3:36am Jul 26, 2017 3:36am
Quoting grandaevus
There's a bug in the function ma of CCFp indicator. double ma(string sym, int per, int Mode, int Price, int i) { double res = 0; int k = 1; int ma_shift = 0; int tf = 0; switch(Period()) { case 1: res += iMA(sym, tf, per*k, ma_shift, Mode, Price, i); k += 5; case 5: res += iMA(sym, tf, per*k, ma_shift, Mode, Price, i); k += 3; case 15: res += iMA(sym, tf, per*k, ma_shift, Mode, Price, i); k += 2; case 30: res += iMA(sym, tf, per*k, ma_shift, Mode, Price, i); k += 2;...
@FerruFx

Do you have any plans to upload a fixed version of ccfp-diff indicator?

Changing operator from += to *= makes a huge difference.

Icmarkets mt5 live

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: fixed_version.jpg Size: 61 KB


Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: unfixed_version.jpg Size: 60 KB
  • #9,535
  • Jul 26, 2017 4:06am Jul 26, 2017 4:06am
Quoting grandaevus
{quote} @FerruFx Do you have any plans to upload a fixed version of ccfp-diff indicator? Changing operator from += to *= makes a huge difference. Icmarkets mt5 live {image} {image}
Hi grandaevus,

first and foremost I 100% agree with you that if there's an error it MUST be fixed.

But in the example you posted here I can't see any difference, the two indies give exactly the same suggestions!
Maybe you used twice the same indicator ?

Please check again.

Best regards,
Bubincka
Porta itineris dicitur longissima esse
  • #9,536
  • Jul 26, 2017 4:10am Jul 26, 2017 4:10am
Quoting bubincka
{quote} Hi grandaevus, first and foremost I 100% agree with you that if there's an error it MUST be fixed. But in the example you posted here I can't see any difference, the two indies give exactly the same suggestions! Maybe you used twice the same indicator ? Please check again. Best regards, Bubincka
Please look at the histogram once more. . Strength levels are not the same.

Yes, they both have the same suggestions, but it's just a coincidence.

When you try to increase trade level, difference would be much clearer.
  • #9,537
  • Jul 26, 2017 4:20am Jul 26, 2017 4:20am
Quoting lghr
Not bad, toady.1440. {image}
Ighr,

Please can you share your indicator in the picture ?
Max Pips & Minimun pips.
thanks
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: MAX PROFIT & LOSS.png Size: 186 KB
  • #9,538
  • Jul 26, 2017 4:23am Jul 26, 2017 4:23am
Quoting grandaevus
{quote} Please look at the histogram once more. . Strength levels are not the same. Yes, they both have the same suggestions, but it's just a coincidence. When you try to increase trade level, difference would be much clearer.
All time frames except MN1 (monthly) are currently affected by this bug and giving wrong results.
  • #9,539
  • Jul 26, 2017 4:28am Jul 26, 2017 4:28am
Quoting grandaevus
{quote} Please look at the histogram once more. . Strength levels are not the same. Yes, they both have the same suggestions, but it's just a coincidence. When you try to increase trade level, difference would be much clearer.
Histogram is optional, CCFp strategy takes trades according suggestions, that's why I told you difference isn't huge.
Nevertheless I sustain your point: if there's an error in the CCFp-Diff it must be fixed, since it is the basis of everything here.

@FxMadness: since you coded your own version, can you please tell if you use '*' instead of '+' in ma(...) function ?

Best regards,
Bubincka
Porta itineris dicitur longissima esse
  • #9,540
  • Jul 26, 2017 4:39am Jul 26, 2017 4:39am
Quoting bubincka
{quote} Histogram is optional, CCFp strategy takes trades according suggestions, that's why I told you difference isn't huge. Nevertheless I sustain your point: if there's an error in the CCFp-Diff it must be fixed, since it is the basis of everything here. @FxMadness: since you coded your own version, can you please tell if you use '*' instead of '+' in ma(...) function ? Best regards, Bubincka
Suggestions are based on strength levels that you see on the histogram.
46 traders viewing now