DislikedI don't really see the point of such challenges or contests to determine who is a "better" trader. "Better" could be defined in terms of so many different aspects of trading. There can be objective criteria, like Sharpe Ratio, Profit Ratio, Max DD, ROI over whatever period, % of Gain, Win/Lose ratio, each weighing the contenders in a different light. But which one of these is more important? Opinions can differ widely. Is a high risk-taker with higher gains a "better" trader than a low-risk plodder? Someone with 5% DD is not necessarily a "better"...Ignored
Nobody Knows the Next move!!