Disliked{quote} So you’re telling me if Monty say‘s to risk the full contract size to max. out his position size on 1 „bet“ is not the same as placing 1 bet on a roulette table? Yes he might have only risked 1% of his bank roll but the TASK itself has NOTHING to do with having a long term proven positive expectancy. Try doing that a 100 times and see where you end up? Don’t confuse gambling with professional gamblers with an long term proven „edge“ in what they are doing and who know about probabilities and mathematical advantages. Anyhow. I’m already tired...Ignored
The posts looking for a 100% guaranteed success will stop?
They may welcome you in the original prop firm thread as they no longer speak about props over there.
I think Monty has a positive expectancy, once again, you are refusing to wrap your head around his model.
If he executes 3 trades with a $50 risk each and 1 hits and results in a $2500 DD (passed account).........how do you not view as positive expectancy?
If he does it 100 times and spends $5K and winds up with 33% success, he has $82.5K in DD.....
yet we are the uneducated.
By the way, my major was mathematics with a minor in statistics.
10