DislikedMonthly signals are still going strong.. I will close them on thursday. These are all live. {image}Ignored
One day I will join the club.......
Attached Image
2
BASKET TRADE Management: Using multiple trade management EA's on basket trades 9 replies
Updated CCFp and CFP indis for relative strength trading 55 replies
Basket Knights - A Basket Trading Round Table 1,310 replies
TMS basket: Dashboard for a basket of MA-Filtered RSI Signals 135 replies
DislikedMonthly signals are still going strong.. I will close them on thursday. These are all live. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Congratulate to you. How much is the max drawdown, and which day you open that orders ? and all your set ? Could you share it ? Thank you.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Max draw down was ~3800 pips = $380. All baskets opened July 5 (because of the weekend and the US holiday on July 4th)Ignored
DislikedMonthly signals are still going strong.. I will close them on thursday. These are all live. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} yes thank you very clear what you said ,,, there was no need to try with template as the Gbpnzd disappeared on daily so as the current GbpNzd was a sell i assume that it was taken as a sale on the weekly Tf when the list formed this morning and the the daily displayed its GpbNzd as a buy only later on.. it disappears and appears randomly anyway ..could be ranging BUt i guess we can all admit that this rule about making a pair of the ccfp-df list disappear because it's opposite it is not really the ultimate and best thing to do _ Opposite...Ignored
Disliked{quote} hi Li0n21 my monthly ccfp also all live and on-going .. why you choose close them on Thursday ? no on Friday or today ?Ignored
DislikedWhy we do not directly use MA to trade ? Timeframe = 43200; MA_Method = 3; Price = 6; Fast = 3; Slow = 5; {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} You are no longer trading the strength of the currencies (what we are discussing in this thread) ... but trading the basic cross of 2 MAs on the current symbol.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Also I noticed that CCFp monthly signals are more consistent than other time frames. One reason could be the bug in the ma function of CCFp. As the bug (if any) does not effect the monthly time frame, but it does effect all other time frames.Ignored
DislikedThere's a bug in the function ma of CCFp indicator. double ma(string sym, int per, int Mode, int Price, int i) { double res = 0; int k = 1; int ma_shift = 0; int tf = 0; switch(Period()) { case 1: res += iMA(sym, tf, per*k, ma_shift, Mode, Price, i); k += 5; case 5: res += iMA(sym, tf, per*k, ma_shift, Mode, Price, i); k += 3; case 15: res += iMA(sym, tf, per*k, ma_shift, Mode, Price, i); k += 2; case 30: res += iMA(sym, tf, per*k, ma_shift, Mode, Price, i); k += 2;...Ignored
Disliked{quote} @FerruFx Do you have any plans to upload a fixed version of ccfp-diff indicator? Changing operator from += to *= makes a huge difference. Icmarkets mt5 live {image} {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hi grandaevus, first and foremost I 100% agree with you that if there's an error it MUST be fixed. But in the example you posted here I can't see any difference, the two indies give exactly the same suggestions! Maybe you used twice the same indicator ? Please check again. Best regards, BubinckaIgnored
Disliked{quote} Please look at the histogram once more. . Strength levels are not the same. Yes, they both have the same suggestions, but it's just a coincidence. When you try to increase trade level, difference would be much clearer.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Please look at the histogram once more. . Strength levels are not the same. Yes, they both have the same suggestions, but it's just a coincidence. When you try to increase trade level, difference would be much clearer.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Histogram is optional, CCFp strategy takes trades according suggestions, that's why I told you difference isn't huge. Nevertheless I sustain your point: if there's an error in the CCFp-Diff it must be fixed, since it is the basis of everything here. @FxMadness: since you coded your own version, can you please tell if you use '*' instead of '+' in ma(...) function ? Best regards, BubinckaIgnored