The question of Yousername was very important. It's impossible to apply the same strategy for all conditions. As a doctor (i was a doctor during 17 years...): the doctor makes his diagnosis to adapt his medical treatment.
To make a good diagnosis, you need reliable informations, always the same to be able to compare them and oppose them.
Ichimoku has strict rules that oppose or cumulate. It is a clear tool.
On this example, GBP NZD, on m15, we make your diagnosis:
GBP-NZD: entry on m5 with respect of rules of ichimoku (stoploss, TP, entry):
GBP-NZD: entry on m1, more difficult. So stochastic (8-5-3) is a very good tool as a filter. Ratio is not better than m2:
GBP-NZD entry on m2 (very good time frame on ichimoku):
To make a good diagnosis, you need reliable informations, always the same to be able to compare them and oppose them.
Ichimoku has strict rules that oppose or cumulate. It is a clear tool.
On this example, GBP NZD, on m15, we make your diagnosis:
GBP-NZD: entry on m5 with respect of rules of ichimoku (stoploss, TP, entry):
GBP-NZD: entry on m1, more difficult. So stochastic (8-5-3) is a very good tool as a filter. Ratio is not better than m2:
GBP-NZD entry on m2 (very good time frame on ichimoku):
3