5 years and still no strategy | Page 56 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

WRB/MC strategy:Coder needed to semi-automate my strategy 11 replies

strategy builder/tester for new scalping strategy 1 reply

Is opposite of losing strategy a winning strategy? 21 replies

After years in trading, do you still believe in get-rich-fast BS? 98 replies

Fozzy - still using after all these years 2 replies

Attachments: 5 years and still no strategy
Exit Attachments

5 years and still no strategy

  • #1,101
  • May 5, 2017 5:35pm May 5, 2017 5:35pm
Quoting VEEFX
{quote} The guy is just try to say what he want to say. Take it or leave it dude. He does not have to prove anything neither do you have to read what he has written one more time... lol tinyurl.com/veefx
Yeah this is the piece of wisdom I was referring to earlier in the thread. I just like to watch the hypocrites squirm VEE.
  • #1,102
  • May 5, 2017 5:35pm May 5, 2017 5:35pm
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: TooSlow2.png Size: 66 KB


Process is right on the chart.
My Threads: Trading is as simple as 1-2-3, Highest Open / Lowest Open Trade
  • #1,103
  • May 5, 2017 5:36pm May 5, 2017 5:36pm
Quoting TooSlow
{quote} {image} Never asked you to teach me how to trade. Your refusal to do it verifies what Deming said.
No, the fact that you don't understand reality verifies that you don't know how to trade. The idea that you're worth the time or effort to teach is laughable.
"The fun is in the hunt. Not the kill."
  • #1,104
  • May 5, 2017 5:37pm May 5, 2017 5:37pm
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: TooSlow1.png Size: 56 KB


Process is right on the chart.
My Threads: Trading is as simple as 1-2-3, Highest Open / Lowest Open Trade
  • #1,105
  • May 5, 2017 5:38pm May 5, 2017 5:38pm
Quoting Redeflect
{quote} No, the fact that you don't understand reality verifies that you don't know how to trade. The idea that you're worth the time or effort to teach is laughable.
Reality?
I and everyone reading this thread understand the reality is you can't describe how you trade as a process.
Therefore, what Deming said applies.
My Threads: Trading is as simple as 1-2-3, Highest Open / Lowest Open Trade
  • #1,106
  • May 5, 2017 5:40pm May 5, 2017 5:40pm
Quoting TooSlow
{image} Process is right on the chart.
That isn't a process. It's a bunch of jibberish that says nothing about when to buy or sell. You're waffling.

Congratulations; You just made a bad trade because you have no clue what's happening to the price and why. Now what?
"The fun is in the hunt. Not the kill."
  • #1,107
  • May 5, 2017 5:42pm May 5, 2017 5:42pm
Quoting Redeflect
{quote} That isn't a process. It's a bunch of jibberish that says nothing about when to buy or sell. You're waffling.
English must not be your first language because the many people who read my threads understand the methods and use them daily. Just visit my threads and see the posts of others using the methods.
My Threads: Trading is as simple as 1-2-3, Highest Open / Lowest Open Trade
  • #1,108
  • May 5, 2017 5:44pm May 5, 2017 5:44pm
Quoting Redeflect
{quote} That isn't a process. It's a bunch of jibberish that says nothing about when to buy or sell. You're waffling.
When the price returns to the open.
Read the instructions on the chart.
Now who's waffling?
My Threads: Trading is as simple as 1-2-3, Highest Open / Lowest Open Trade
  • #1,109
  • May 5, 2017 5:47pm May 5, 2017 5:47pm
Quoting Redeflect
{quote} No, the fact that you don't understand reality verifies that you don't know how to trade. The idea that you're worth the time or effort to teach is laughable.
Redeflect's thread:

https://www.forexfactory.com/showthread.php?t=644355

The 90/90/90 standard

  1. Post 1
  2. Cleanup
  3. Quote
  4. First Post: Mar 1, 2017 2:11am

  1. Redeflect
  2. | Joined Feb 2017 | Status: Member | 155 Posts | Online Now

I'd like everyone's opinion on the 90/90/90 standard. I realized in laughter this morning that I was nearly a part of that 90%. (I think I lost 80% of my account in 60 days). In my honest opinion if you push yourself and survive those 90 days... you're in the clear.

Redeflect, really? And you say I do not know how to trade!

My Threads: Trading is as simple as 1-2-3, Highest Open / Lowest Open Trade
  • #1,110
  • May 5, 2017 5:52pm May 5, 2017 5:52pm
Quoting TooSlow
{quote} When the price returns to the open. Read the instructions on the chart. Now who's waffling?
You have no idea how to trade. You're a gambler. Plain and simple. Not even a very good one. I can think of at least half a dozen clear instances where your 'process' just lost simply because you have no clue what you're doing.
"The fun is in the hunt. Not the kill."
  • #1,111
  • May 5, 2017 5:56pm May 5, 2017 5:56pm
Quoting TooSlow
{quote} Redeflect's thread: https://www.forexfactory.com/showthread.php?t=644355 The 90/90/90 standard Post 1 Cleanup Quote First Post: Mar 1, 2017 2:11am Redeflect | Joined Feb 2017 | Status: Member | 155 Posts | Online Now...
LOL! Now I KNOW you don't know how to trade.
"The fun is in the hunt. Not the kill."
  • #1,112
  • May 5, 2017 5:56pm May 5, 2017 5:56pm
Quoting Redeflect
{quote} You have no idea how to trade. You're a gambler. Plain and simple. Not even a very good one. I can think of at least half a dozen clear instances where your 'process' just lost simply because you have no clue what you're doing.
I have shown you my step-by-step process.
Show me yours.
Until then...

Attached Image
My Threads: Trading is as simple as 1-2-3, Highest Open / Lowest Open Trade
  • #1,113
  • May 5, 2017 5:58pm May 5, 2017 5:58pm
Quoting TooSlow
{quote} When the price returns to the open. Read the instructions on the chart. Now who's waffling?
You're still waffling. But that's okay. The rest of us will enjoy taking your money.
"The fun is in the hunt. Not the kill."
  • #1,114
  • May 5, 2017 5:59pm May 5, 2017 5:59pm
Quoting TooSlow
{quote} I have shown you my step-by-step process. Show me yours. Until then... {image}
That's the 3rd time you've had to use the exact same statement made by someone else to support your invalid logic. Methinks you don't know how to think...

Let me paraphrase that quote for you: "If someone can't teach me a step by step process then I can't figure out how to do something... and since I'm the smartest man in the world if it doesn't make sense to me then it doesn't make sense"
"The fun is in the hunt. Not the kill."
  • #1,115
  • May 5, 2017 6:00pm May 5, 2017 6:00pm
Quoting Redeflect
{quote} You have no idea how to trade. You're a gambler. Plain and simple. Not even a very good one. I can think of at least half a dozen clear instances where your 'process' just lost simply because you have no clue what you're doing.
Redeflect is what you are trying to do here.
Instead of posting your trading method as a process, you are "redeflecting" the discussion to make it about my process.
Nice try.

So we are all waiting for you, Redeflect, to post your trading method as a process.
My Threads: Trading is as simple as 1-2-3, Highest Open / Lowest Open Trade
  • #1,116
  • May 5, 2017 6:05pm May 5, 2017 6:05pm
Quoting Redeflect
{quote} That's the 3rd time you've had to use the exact same statement made by someone else to support your invalid logic. Methinks you don't know how to think...
You must mean invalid argument.

An argument is INVALID just in case it's NOT VALID.
What this means is that even if all the premises are true, it's still possible for the conclusion to be false. The truth of the premises doesn't guarantee the truth of the conclusion.
That's ALL it means to call an argument "invalid".

Validity
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For other uses, see Validity (disambiguation).
In logic, an argument is valid if and only if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion nevertheless to be false.[1] It is not required that a valid argument have premises that are actually true,[2] but to have premises that, if they were true, would guarantee the truth of the argument's conclusion. A formula is valid if and only if it is true under every interpretation, and an argument form (or schema) is valid if and only if every argument of that logical form is valid.


What are you saying is invalid?

Methinks you do not understand logic.
My Threads: Trading is as simple as 1-2-3, Highest Open / Lowest Open Trade
  • #1,117
  • May 5, 2017 6:08pm May 5, 2017 6:08pm
Quoting Redeflect
{quote} The charts have anomalous movvement all the time. Just look at EUR/USD yesterday about an hour before the european market opened. There was a gradual/solid dip down for about 20 minutes after half a day of up-trending that broke a multi-day low before the price went up 100 pips throughout the day. When was the last time you saw a rapid large move during a low-volume period that broke resistance before heading in the entire opposite direction with no change in fundamentals? That's manipulation. How about the fact that there's often large...
I can see your point, but the fact that you were able to see this on an M5 chart means that you could trade that. Why it happens I have no idea, but it could be traded.

Quoting Redeflect
{quote} Learn physics and watch the price? Statistics and math will help you get there. I mean.. shit... you're asking me to explain to you how to think. If you don't know how to do that by now then you'll lose at this game. The process is to have a brain and do what the human mind does which is to recognize patterns and elucidate connections between various stimuli. Watch the TEDtalk: david_eagleman_can_we_create_new_senses_for_humans Then use your damn visual cortex to interpret the charts after watching it for hours a day for months.
Actually it is NOT thinking that helps you win this game. All you need is If this...then that.
If you are good at something, never do it for free--Joker
  • #1,118
  • May 5, 2017 6:28pm May 5, 2017 6:28pm
Quoting TooSlow
{quote} You must mean invalid argument. An argument is INVALID just in case it's NOT VALID. What this means is that even if all the premises are true, it's still possible for the conclusion to be false. The truth of the premises doesn't guarantee the truth of the conclusion. That's ALL it means to call an argument "invalid". Validity From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For other uses, see Validity (disambiguation). In logic, an...
Spoken like a true sheep. Keep trying to wrap your mind around things beyond your grasp. You'll understand some day kiddo.
"The fun is in the hunt. Not the kill."
  • #1,119
  • May 5, 2017 6:34pm May 5, 2017 6:34pm
Quoting Redeflect
{quote} Spoken like a true sheep. Keep trying to wrap your mind around things beyond your grasp. You'll understand some day kiddo.
Now we have moved on to ad hominem attacks. Methinks you cannot state your trading method as a process.
My Threads: Trading is as simple as 1-2-3, Highest Open / Lowest Open Trade
  • #1,120
  • May 5, 2017 6:36pm May 5, 2017 6:36pm
Quoting TooSlow
{quote} Now we have moved on to ad hominem attacks. Methinks you cannot state your trading method as a process.
Already said I don't have the time, patience, or will to teach YOU how to trade. Nice to see you're still as simple-minded in your approach as you were an hour ago.
"The fun is in the hunt. Not the kill."
0 traders viewing now