Disliked{quote} yes MT4. If MT4 volume is not correct then god knows how i've made a single penny because it is the backbone of my trading.Ignored
maybe some who use this can also write here what it represence.
The Barak Hedging Method 1 25 replies
Hedging 34 replies
Hedging anyone? 0 replies
Hedging 7 replies
Hedging strategies 7 replies
Disliked{quote} yes MT4. If MT4 volume is not correct then god knows how i've made a single penny because it is the backbone of my trading.Ignored
Disliked{quote} yes, its not volume. i have to take a look, but i think it was maybe how many different trades was done in this bar or how often the price changed in this bar. but maybe i am wrong and its corrected, but in mt4 i dont think so.Ignored
Disliked{quote} yes tickcounter , so nothing compareable to volume, would be funny if you would be sucessfull by volume, first one in forex ;-). tickcounter is completly different.Ignored
DislikedTo clarify my post, I was mostly referring to the post I quoted with which we were told same pair hedging (or "nedging" by merlin) offers no advantage whatsoever. As for my reference about the three pair ring situation, it was to summarize a response to the other posts without making those other quotations. It was in order to avoid their reply from becoming side tracked because they seemed adamant about the algebra and I wanted to point out that yes, I understand.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Large spread is a concern but less so in relation with the long-term character of the positions that I was referring to. However, as I've mentioned before, the behaviour of a liquid market after the weekend gap is usually consistent with large traders doing the nedge and getting trapped on the wrong side of the trade. While I may be dumb, Goldm@n $achs isn't. kIgnored
Disliked{quote} If a trader "hedges" then there wouldn't be a SL as the hedge is the protection so doesn't matter if the spreads widen. Of course you could use a SL on both positions but I don't think that's the way it's usually done but could be wrong.Ignored
QuoteDislikedAnyway I hope you will do me the pleasure of adding me to your huge ignore list
QuoteDislikedwith all of the other arseholes who obviously infuriate you for having a different opinion.
QuoteDislikedOn the other hand if you would like to learn something I will be happy to provide a detailed example of how I make same pair hedging work for me.
Disliked{quote} This is true. I do often forget there are people that do stupid shit like not use SL's. In this case it works in their favor, but no more than trying to poke your eye out is benefited by cutting-off your fingers.Ignored
Disliked{quote} This will always be regarded as so very clever. Clever girl. Good job. Very impressed with your creativity. {quote} Now that you reminded me... yes. Yes, I will. Thanks! {quote} That's not how you say "dumb fucks who are just a blight on the forum, and world, and who I have no desire to read their ignorance". But, you used letters that made words, so give yourself a pat on the back. I know it was probably a struggle for you. {quote} Classic.Ignored
Disliked{quote} This will always be regarded as so very clever. Clever girl. Good job. Very impressed with your creativity. {quote} Now that you reminded me... yes. Yes, I will. Thanks! {quote} That's not how you say "dumb fucks who are just a blight on the forum, and world, and who I have no desire to read their ignorance". But, you used letters that made words, so give yourself a pat on the back. I know it was probably a struggle for you. {quote} Classic.Ignored
DislikedAs Hanover pointed out, I am talking about "hedging" within the SAME pair. It is not an opinion. It is a mathematical certainty (100%). If you want to give your money away to your broker by hedging within the same pair then be my guest. I've always been quite surprised at how many "traders" can't wrap their head around the concept of net position. All of your open trades within a pair should be in ONE direction and ONE direction only. If you have contradicting open positions you are incurring additional and unnecessary cost. Simple as that. As for...Ignored
Disliked{quote} I know that I for one have been at awe of your genius. Please forgive me for not being able to wrap my head around this profound understanding, or concept. lol Look, surely you've heard of the idiom: "Different strokes for different folks." Why some of you are so determined to prove the point from your perspective, and with such hatred and venom, is beyond me. If they are wrong then why not allow them to be wrong and continue providing liquidity to the market with their account deposits?Ignored
Disliked{quote} I'm sure he has heard the warnings and it is now up to him to decide whether or not to accept that information. {quote} Yeah but the way you "try to help" is actually not helping. Your help is probably perceived as conflicting information because your way of communication clearly shows that you do not want what's good for him. Imagine you're in a psychiatric hospital and they try to shove pills in your mouth to tranquilize you while saying "you can't see that we try to help, nothing more." Well what they really mean is, this is good for...Ignored
DislikedIt's so hard to have decent discussion in FF these days when everyone keep taking things personal. How hard is it to agree to disagree? Some of you need to learn how to let go and move on.Ignored
Disliked{quote} I'm sure he has heard the warnings and it is now up to him to decide whether or not to accept that information. {quote} Yeah but the way you "try to help" is actually not helping. Your help is probably perceived as conflicting information because your way of communication clearly shows that you do not want what's good for him. Imagine you're in a psychiatric hospital and they try to shove pills in your mouth to tranquilize you while saying "you can't see that we try to help, nothing more." Well what they really mean is, this is good for...Ignored