Disliked{quote} Hello SKadir, Interesting question. I would draw it like MTL 3. Lets see how other would draw. Best wishes,Ignored
As always, thanks a billion.
What is order flow trading? 93 replies
How to flow with the order flow? 26 replies
Order flow trading thread 166 replies
Domino's Price and order flow trading 1,400 replies
Order Flow Trading with ICCE Channels 3 replies
Disliked{quote} Hello SKadir, Interesting question. I would draw it like MTL 3. Lets see how other would draw. Best wishes,Ignored
DislikedHello All, I had difficulties in drawing a MTL in daily AUDNZD chart...See attached 3 possible ways I see to draw it. Which one is the correct way to draw it? Thanks. {image}Ignored
DislikedIm very new to supply and demand trading. Practicing on demo, mostly D, 4h and 1h....however Im dabbling on shorter TF for E/U. Trying to contribute to the thread....any feedback is appreciated. Ezzy {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Dear Denis, I understood that I have to join last two lower highs what made lower low than previous high. For me it looks that you have an additional rule - lower high has to take out a SZ (or previous high SZ). Is it correct? Best wishes,Ignored
Disliked{quote} Just my opinion. MTL1 is traditional technical analysis way of drawing trend lines. They are looking for pivot highs and pivot lows. In that context, MTL1 is correct. MTL2 is SaD way of drawing momentum lines (or trendline) we are looking for SaD zones being created and removed and in the process if a LL (in this case) is created then you connect the ML. Key here is go back to Supply and Demand zones and see if they manage to break opposing zones. MTL3 is more aggressive version of traditional TA analysis and how they draw trendlines.Ignored
DislikedHello All, Short AUDUSD. Wait for few days for price to come back to the daily SZ then today I took the trade at H4 TF. Please comment as you wish....I am here to learn. W1 Curve: {image} D1 Momentum: {image} H4 Entry: {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Just my opinion. MTL1 is traditional technical analysis way of drawing trend lines. They are looking for pivot highs and pivot lows. In that context, MTL1 is correct. MTL2 is SaD way of drawing momentum lines (or trendline) we are looking for SaD zones being created and removed and in the process if a LL (in this case) is created then you connect the ML. Key here is go back to Supply and Demand zones and see if they manage to break opposing zones. MTL3 is more aggressive version of traditional TA analysis and how they draw trendlines.Ignored
DislikedGBPAUD (Long) - TDA Weekly - Curve (Middle) {image} Daily - Trend (Up) / Momentum line (Up) {image} H1 - Entry (Nested DZ or new DZ after break of down momentum line) {image} First time I am doing this kind of TDA actually, don't know if I am wide off the mark.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Just my opinion. MTL1 is traditional technical analysis way of drawing trend lines. They are looking for pivot highs and pivot lows. In that context, MTL1 is correct. MTL2 is SaD way of drawing momentum lines (or trendline) we are looking for SaD zones being created and removed and in the process if a LL (in this case) is created then you connect the ML. Key here is go back to Supply and Demand zones and see if they manage to break opposing zones. MTL3 is more aggressive version of traditional TA analysis and how they draw trendlines.Ignored