Trading Institutional Order Flow

Quoting Nojak

Disliked

{quote} Hello SKadir, Interesting question. I would draw it like MTL 3. Lets see how other would draw. Best wishes,

Ignored

Quoting SKadir

Disliked

Hello All, I had difficulties in drawing a MTL in daily AUDNZD chart...See attached 3 possible ways I see to draw it. Which one is the correct way to draw it? Thanks. {image}

Ignored

Quoting Denden2012

Disliked

{quote} What I see. {image}

Ignored

Quoting Ezzy

Disliked

Im very new to supply and demand trading. Practicing on demo, mostly D, 4h and 1h....however Im dabbling on shorter TF for E/U. Trying to contribute to the thread....any feedback is appreciated. Ezzy {image}

Ignored

Quoting Nojak

Disliked

{quote} Dear Denis, I understood that I have to join last two lower highs what made lower low than previous high. For me it looks that you have an additional rule - lower high has to take out a SZ (or previous high SZ). Is it correct? Best wishes,

Ignored

Quoting Denden2012

Disliked

{quote} What I see. {image}

Ignored

Quoting Denden2012

Disliked

{quote} Just my opinion. MTL1 is traditional technical analysis way of drawing trend lines. They are looking for pivot highs and pivot lows. In that context, MTL1 is correct. MTL2 is SaD way of drawing momentum lines (or trendline) we are looking for SaD zones being created and removed and in the process if a LL (in this case) is created then you connect the ML. Key here is go back to Supply and Demand zones and see if they manage to break opposing zones. MTL3 is more aggressive version of traditional TA analysis and how they draw trendlines.

Ignored

Quoting SKadir

Disliked

Hello All, Short AUDUSD. Wait for few days for price to come back to the daily SZ then today I took the trade at H4 TF. Please comment as you wish....I am here to learn. W1 Curve: {image} D1 Momentum: {image} H4 Entry: {image}

Ignored

Quoting Denden2012

Disliked

{quote} Just my opinion. MTL1 is traditional technical analysis way of drawing trend lines. They are looking for pivot highs and pivot lows. In that context, MTL1 is correct. MTL2 is SaD way of drawing momentum lines (or trendline) we are looking for SaD zones being created and removed and in the process if a LL (in this case) is created then you connect the ML. Key here is go back to Supply and Demand zones and see if they manage to break opposing zones. MTL3 is more aggressive version of traditional TA analysis and how they draw trendlines.

Ignored

Quoting 4rXal-ghul

Disliked

GBPAUD (Long) - TDA Weekly - Curve (Middle) {image} Daily - Trend (Up) / Momentum line (Up) {image} H1 - Entry (Nested DZ or new DZ after break of down momentum line) {image} First time I am doing this kind of TDA actually, don't know if I am wide off the mark.

Ignored

Quoting Denden2012

Disliked

{quote} Just my opinion. MTL1 is traditional technical analysis way of drawing trend lines. They are looking for pivot highs and pivot lows. In that context, MTL1 is correct. MTL2 is SaD way of drawing momentum lines (or trendline) we are looking for SaD zones being created and removed and in the process if a LL (in this case) is created then you connect the ML. Key here is go back to Supply and Demand zones and see if they manage to break opposing zones. MTL3 is more aggressive version of traditional TA analysis and how they draw trendlines.

Ignored