Disliked{quote} I can't explain it. But any failure to explain every single oddity doesn't mean that 9/11 was organised by the US government. There could be any number of alternative explanations. Lots of these theories take something which cannot be explained, and then make a big leap by suggesting it was the government. It is not logical to make such a claim without ruling out alternatives. If people want to say they believe the government did it, I don't really have an issue with that. But it isn't something I believe personally. I admit, there doesn't...Ignored
1. The US government claimed that a Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon per official report. There were no photos of such plane crash or recovered debris to support such statement. If there were no cover ups then I am sure the US government could have just stated that is was a planted bomb that went off, and I am sure that would have been the end of it. So in my mind, they created the controversy to begin with by making such claims of a 757 Boeing as the cause of the damage inflicted on the Pentagon on 9-11, when evidence doesn't support it.
2. Reputable civil engineers who reviewed the bombing of the two towers have gone on record to state that it was virtually impossible to cause the type of destruction we witnessed on that day from a Jet Airliner, let alone two, one for each building alone and that something else had to have aided the collapse of those two towers. Whether someone planted charges or what not is something that I can not confirm or prove, but the physics, and forensics do not support the initial and official reports. In other words there are a lot of inconsistencies to suggest a conspiracy when there are no logical or reasonable explanations to explain conclusively on a scientific level.
I was at ground zero about three weeks later when the events initially happened, and I was amazed by what I saw. I have been in a lot of war zones in my life but this was different in that this looked apocalyptic in the destruction I would view. Also at that same time, and something I will never forget to this day, was the Reading Street Pub, a place where a lot of the Firemen lost on that day used to hang out. I stopped in there to have a Iris coffee, and when I went to use the restroom, I noticed that every inch of the walls were littered with messages from people expressing sorrow and condolences to the men and women of various fire-stations lost trying to rescue people. There were messages on the wall scrawled with perma marker pens, pasted cards, pictures, post cards. Another experience I had that also left an indelible mark in my memory was when I visited St Paul's Cathedral, a church that stood next to a building that was destroyed, yet the church had not one blemish on it, virtually was untouched. This was the same church in which the Red Cross was staging it's operations as well as the same Church in which George Washington met for prayer right before being inaugurated as the first President of the United States in 1789. These are just some of my accounts, but of course does nothing to support my narrative about a conspiracy, just that along with hundreds of reports and pages I researched through, gave me the impetus to go in person to see what was going on at the time, aside from visiting the families of my friends.
Besides the fact of the FBI investigation into WallStreet firms involved with the Housing and loan scandals, what followed were US invasion of Afghanistan, and Iraq. It just seemed to me, after being in Iraq on two occasions, both under administrations named Bush, in 10 years apart , that 9-11 was a convenient excuse to make a case for going to war. Also take into account that Bushes now are supporting Hillary in this years election, tells me all I need to know who they really are, and who they really work for and it is certainly not the American people.
There are too many questions regarding 9-11 that probably will not be answered until this day, but there seems to be more surfacing with each day passing, and with congresses recent override of Obama's veto to allow families of the 9-11 victims to sue Saudi Arabia for the role they played, is by no doubt a curious one at best.
Anyway, I acknowledge your views and understand why you would be skeptical, there simply is not enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that foul play took place here, but I also believe there is enough questions to prove inconsistencies to dismiss this outright as just another conspiracy theory, something that persists to this day.
http://www.lbc.co.uk/politics/parties/ukip/nigel-farage/the-nigel-farage-show-watch-it-back/ {image}
I really don't know why. You're the fundamentals expert, you say!
. I don't mean any offence.
