with 0.01 lots 30 pips tp
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
- #302
- Aug 13, 2016 7:35am Aug 13, 2016 7:35am
- | Commercial User | Joined Apr 2013 | 1,600 Posts
@armyda: you can trade with M1 is your problems not mine- please make a test from 2008 - 2016 with M1 and Gridset 100 not only the last months - let me see
5000 euros
tp 50
0.01 lots
miltpi 1.1.
gris size 100
2018\2016
- #303
- Aug 13, 2016 8:21am Aug 13, 2016 8:21am
- Joined Aug 2014 | Status: Trading | 2,163 Posts
Trading is the hardest way to make easy money...
- #304
- Aug 13, 2016 9:27am Aug 13, 2016 9:27am
- | Commercial User | Joined Apr 2013 | 1,600 Posts
@armyda: you can trade with M1 is your problems not mine
- #306
- Aug 13, 2016 9:29am Aug 13, 2016 9:29am
- | Commercial User | Joined Apr 2013 | 1,600 Posts
Version 1.47 of the EA released (I updated Post 1). In this version the user can select random buy/sell as the trade logic. It seems that random defeats random market! Please note that the below backtest is the result of a set of random entries which may be different on anther run on your platform. {image}
- #307
- Aug 13, 2016 9:30am Aug 13, 2016 9:30am
- Joined Aug 2014 | Status: Trading | 2,163 Posts
{quote} our guru is a forge of EA
Trading is the hardest way to make easy money...
- #309
- Aug 13, 2016 10:34am Aug 13, 2016 10:34am
- Joined Aug 2014 | Status: Trading | 2,163 Posts
Trading is the hardest way to make easy money...
- #312
- Aug 13, 2016 3:10pm Aug 13, 2016 3:10pm
- Joined Aug 2014 | Status: Trading | 2,163 Posts
Trading is the hardest way to make easy money...
@MT7
Hi mate !
I have to admit some observations.
I use the v 1.45 at two MT4 platforms – GP (Global Prime) 51 + 52:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/AGT...-h4-gp/1742395
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/AGT...-h4-gp/1742409
Although the setfiles for both tests are very similar the results + EA behaviour is quite different ? That’s a bit confusing me.
(I use 25k plus all pairs only to get a full picture of the pairs behaviour at a demo – that’s not for my real live trading).
The settings are included into the zip file.
Furthermore I’m impressed/surprised about the results of armyda’s BTs …. To good to be true
? Grid trading with (light) marti at the TF M1 ??? It seems the bot is doing the job with nearly all pairs – almost every of the BTs is ending up with pretty good gains running them for years even …. ? Ummm … I never ever would expect things like these working ! 
Anyway … the numerous BTs in the thread look intriguing enough to me, so I decided to start at coming Monday another test at M1 with all the pairs at a 25k account to see what will happen.
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/AGT...-h4-gp/1743644
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/AGT...-h4-gp/1743646
Honestly to say not sure about this M1 test … looks a bit strange and very uncommonly. Could open a TE in FF.com in the case of some successful + hopeful developments of the test accounts in a few days.
And yes, a last comment: I’m wondering about the two older test accounts with v 1.08 plus 1.17 – they do so far a nice job. I haven’t a clue about the nature + severity of the bugs and improvements you made after these versions. But I would like to continue these 2 tests with former versions ? Makes that sense or is it completely useless ? Will severe bugs in the code kill the accounts sooner or later in any case ?
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/AGT...-h4-gp/1733798
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/AGT...-h4-gp/1712104
Hi mate !
I have to admit some observations.
I use the v 1.45 at two MT4 platforms – GP (Global Prime) 51 + 52:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/AGT...-h4-gp/1742395
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/AGT...-h4-gp/1742409
Although the setfiles for both tests are very similar the results + EA behaviour is quite different ? That’s a bit confusing me.
(I use 25k plus all pairs only to get a full picture of the pairs behaviour at a demo – that’s not for my real live trading).
The settings are included into the zip file.
Furthermore I’m impressed/surprised about the results of armyda’s BTs …. To good to be true
? Grid trading with (light) marti at the TF M1 ??? It seems the bot is doing the job with nearly all pairs – almost every of the BTs is ending up with pretty good gains running them for years even …. ? Ummm … I never ever would expect things like these working ! Anyway … the numerous BTs in the thread look intriguing enough to me, so I decided to start at coming Monday another test at M1 with all the pairs at a 25k account to see what will happen.
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/AGT...-h4-gp/1743644
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/AGT...-h4-gp/1743646
Honestly to say not sure about this M1 test … looks a bit strange and very uncommonly. Could open a TE in FF.com in the case of some successful + hopeful developments of the test accounts in a few days.
And yes, a last comment: I’m wondering about the two older test accounts with v 1.08 plus 1.17 – they do so far a nice job. I haven’t a clue about the nature + severity of the bugs and improvements you made after these versions. But I would like to continue these 2 tests with former versions ? Makes that sense or is it completely useless ? Will severe bugs in the code kill the accounts sooner or later in any case ?
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/AGT...-h4-gp/1733798
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/AGT...-h4-gp/1712104
- #314
- Edited 3:53pm Aug 13, 2016 3:39pm | Edited 3:53pm
- Joined Aug 2014 | Status: Trading | 2,163 Posts
Trading is the hardest way to make easy money...
{quote} Hello DerBerliner, In Version 1.45 the user can select different trade logic. You may run two instances of the EA with different trade logic? ........
So ist the same logic for both.But the trading behaviour is very different ..... strange result ....
- #316
- Aug 13, 2016 3:53pm Aug 13, 2016 3:53pm
- Joined Aug 2014 | Status: Trading | 2,163 Posts
{quote} I checked the platforms anew: both are running with trade logic "Follow Previous Candle" ?
Trading is the hardest way to make easy money...