{quote}From my perspective, the younger generations are lazy. They've had everything handed to them. I grew up with seven channels on the TV, no video games and payphones.
james16 Chart Thread
- #139,122
- Edited 4:36pm May 28, 2016 4:03pm | Edited 4:36pm
- Joined May 2011 | Status: Trader | 1,265 Posts
{quote} It must have sucked growing up without PlayStation and Cartoon Network. What did you do, played Tic-tac-toe with a scroll and quill?
Bryan, I know heaps of young people who give a damn about this world and others, are out there being active in making this joint a better place, and kick serious ass.Yo Inco, would you not have taken that USD/CAD PB on a retrace to the left eye? Currently at a PPZ on D1. Hope it works out.
'Fail to plan, plan to fail'
{quote} Well, i can say that they sure don't make jeans like they used to. Why i recall having to smash my brand new pair of Levi's into a stone wall to soften em up so i could actually wear them. Want another story from the vault? Well, did i ever tell yiz about the time when.........And thank gawd for texting. I don't have to actually speak to anyone.
ROTFLMAO. Get a Levi’s 510 skinny-fit the next time, it’s soft and stretchable. BTW, I was just poking innocent fun at Bryan and Gen X. No harm intended.
I’ll enter on a retrace in certain situations; like on breakout bars for example, I’ll wait for a pullback. This USDCAD Pin Bar is just me forcing a trade with the short-term trend. USDCAD has been generous all year so I’ll keep taking and riding my luck until it runs out.
- #139,124
- May 29, 2016 3:03am May 29, 2016 3:03am
- Joined May 2011 | Status: Trader | 1,265 Posts
'Fail to plan, plan to fail'
- #139,126
- May 29, 2016 1:03pm May 29, 2016 1:03pm
and why have I never heard of price action before - probably would have long ago become rich. Russian translation is of course slightly different from the original, according to different authors explain some models and entry points for trade.
Russian translation is of course slightly different from the original, according to different authors explain some models and entry points for trade.
- #139,130
- May 30, 2016 4:28am May 30, 2016 4:28am
- Joined May 2011 | Status: Trader | 1,265 Posts
All the best Bill! In a similar vein -
USD/CAD H4 BEOVB/DBHLC. H1 DBHLC too. A bit of other confluence around. Will tighten SL soon as price gets going a bit. Will be monitoring this trade at least hourly. Plan is to cut out early if price heads north.
USD/CAD H4 BEOVB/DBHLC. H1 DBHLC too. A bit of other confluence around. Will tighten SL soon as price gets going a bit. Will be monitoring this trade at least hourly. Plan is to cut out early if price heads north.
'Fail to plan, plan to fail'
Hi cbo,
The AUDUSD 0.72500 touch trade that I shared with Bill, worked. I was bullish but that was before the RBA slashed interest rates. The bounce still worked for 120 pips in typical no-drawdown fashion. I took partial profits at +40 pips and screwed up on the second TP but made a profit nonetheless.
I smell another touch trader don’t be shy. I could use the company around here.
The AUDUSD 0.72500 touch trade that I shared with Bill, worked. I was bullish but that was before the RBA slashed interest rates. The bounce still worked for 120 pips in typical no-drawdown fashion. I took partial profits at +40 pips and screwed up on the second TP but made a profit nonetheless.
I smell another touch trader
don’t be shy. I could use the company around here. - #139,132
- Edited 7:27pm May 30, 2016 3:36pm | Edited 7:27pm
- Joined May 2011 | Status: Trader | 1,265 Posts
Hi cbo, The AUDUSD 0.72500 touch trade that I shared with Bill, worked. I was bullish but that was before the RBA slashed interest rates. The bounce still worked for 120 pips in typical no-drawdown fashion. I took partial profits at +40 pips and screwed up on the second TP but made a profit nonetheless. I smell another touch trader
I got a better entry on USD/CAD trade i'm already in. PA for me was on H4 and D1, and here below we see a DBHLC on H1 just rejecting BRN. Not real convincing on it's own like many H1 signals, but some extra confluence in my direction. Er, well we'll see. She could always shoot north! (SL visible on previous post H4 chart). :nerd:
EUR/AUD H4 Breaking down. Will see if i can hang on for a BO of bottom of this box. Profit locked in.
EUR/AUD update 15M. Happy to lock in 100 pips here and let market take me out. Will jump in again if there's a BO of 1.54000 level which may be on the cards. Either way, still in trade letting it run.
'Fail to plan, plan to fail'
- #139,136
- May 31, 2016 6:24pm May 31, 2016 6:24pm
So, still no one has told me. does James make more money from his $2 million or so per year from monthly subscription fees, or from his years and years of trading experience. Genuine question. This is a cult, closed doors. I will get no sensible answer. I will be ignored. I implore anyone who has been consistently profitable for a year or more using this stuff please come forward. It's not going to happen is it? I would love to be proved wrong, and I might even consider subscribing....might. ain't going to happen though. is it?.........
I wouldn't worry about whether Mike and James make good money from their trading. As far as i'm concerned, they do provide some good training and information on this free forum and on the paid forum, to help improve peeps' trading results. What YOU have to work out is whether YOU can improve YOUR trading with that same information. Or perhaps a different system altogether is best for you. The only way you will know is to test, test and test the system. Gain knowledge and experience.
I'm a huge Formula One fan and i can tell you they have their aerodynamicists and wind tunnel working 24/7, engineers and simulators working nearly as hard + much much more and all because they want to improve their cars performance by a tenth of a second for a typical 1min 40second lap! They test, test some more and then test again day after day after day looking for improvement. Point is, that is what you have to do with James16 or any other systems' stuff because there is no HOLY GRAIL trading system.
For what it's worth, i joined the PF for one month but then left because the 2 things i wanted from it weren't there (personal to me and i don't need to share them here). However what i have learnt here on the FF has sped up my understanding of what drives the Forex market and how to improve my chances of success. I have also taken nuggets of info from other threads here on FF and tested them, some i have implemented into my trading, most i have not. My 20 years of share trading experience (the first 10 unsuccessful) has also helped. But whether this way of trading is the best in the world or the worst in the world is irrelevant, it's what YOU have learnt, tested and experienced in results, that matters most.
You don't have to pay Mike and James a cent but you DO have to pay a price for success and that price is your own effort and time, to see if this way of trading is good for you or not. There is no shortcut. If what Mike and James teach is sh#t but people keep subscribing then who are the fools here? If what they teach is gold and yet so many choose not to subscribe then again who are the fools here? Well, there are NO fools, it's what the information/education does for YOU that matters. Forget about whether Mike and James make money trading this way. Work out whether you can make money trading with these principles.
So i'm not trying to be a smart ar#e here TGM, just laying down the facts as i see them. Just my opinion.
Hope this helps in some way,
Bill
- #139,139
- Jun 1, 2016 12:12am Jun 1, 2016 12:12am
- Joined May 2011 | Status: Trader | 1,265 Posts
@Mike will you trade this daily BEOB ? {image}
I reckon that trade might have legs Inco!
I have to agree with your previous post Bill.
OIL H4 IB.
'Fail to plan, plan to fail'