Accumulative Profits Grid System | Page 174 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Grid (not grid system) or horizontal lines indicator 6 replies

Grid, Burst Grid, Grid Risk and Grid Profit 1 reply

Forgot how to add MA to Accumulative Distribution 3 replies

The Accumulative Swing Index (ASI) from 'New Concepts In Technical Trading Systems' 1 reply

Accumulative Swing Index Indicator for MT4 2 replies

Attachments: Accumulative Profits Grid System
Exit Attachments

Accumulative Profits Grid System

  • #3,461
  • May 7, 2016 7:02am May 7, 2016 7:02am
Quoting sajib0189
This is not the thread for discussing more about expand grid EA... without remon permission we cant post any more here cause it is not his EA better we talk in orginal Expand Grid EA thread here http://www.forexfactory.com/showthread.php?t=548671 if anybody want anything please post there {quote} for, hapanoy, though my acc is macro acc and i set initial lot 0.03 means per pips 3 cents, others setting are all same default 3 days running in 200$ demo acc result here, where unfortunately last day 6 may, it was offline casue my internet...
  • #3,462
  • Edited 11:21am May 7, 2016 10:17am | Edited 11:21am
This is my experiment (Lots .4, spread 1.4). Date Start: 4, May 2016
Attached Image(s) (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: TH_MODE#.4 (REMON).gif Size: 6 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: TH_MODE#.4 (REMON).jpg Size: 332 KB
Attached File(s)
File Type: txt TH_MODE#.4 (REMON).txt   3 KB | 340 downloads
File Type: rar MOD .4.rar   8 KB | 357 downloads
  • #3,463
  • Edited 11:21am May 7, 2016 10:21am | Edited 11:21am
... with (Lots .01, spread -near- 1.0). Date Start: 3, May 2016
Attached Image(s) (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: TH_MODE#.01(REMON).gif Size: 5 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: TH_MODE#.01(REMON).jpg Size: 334 KB
Attached File(s)
File Type: txt TH_MODE#.01(REMON).txt   3 KB | 308 downloads
File Type: rar MOD .01.rar   7 KB | 327 downloads
  • #3,464
  • May 7, 2016 5:55pm May 7, 2016 5:55pm
Thanks For All,
Sorry For Late And Not Answer Questions,
----------

Method3 Discovered

From 15$ To 2000$ In 2 Months

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Image1.png Size: 24 KB

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Image2.png Size: 50 KB

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Image3.png Size: 56 KB


How It Works??
1. Do Sell Only
2. Do Buy Only

The Loss Is Bigger Than Win !!

Just Invert Buy And Sell To Convert Loss To Win.
  • #3,465
  • May 7, 2016 6:21pm May 7, 2016 6:21pm
Quoting remon78eg
Thanks For All, Sorry For Late And Not Answer Questions, ---------- Method3 Discovered From 15$ To 2000$ In 2 Months {image} {image} {image} How It Works?? 1. Do Sell Only 2. Do Buy Only The Loss Is Bigger Than Win !! Just Invert Buy And Sell To Convert Loss To Win.
Or just stay away from this system. You can't win many and me told before. Waste of time! Just want to see 100%!WHERE IS 100% ??!!
  • #3,466
  • May 7, 2016 7:39pm May 7, 2016 7:39pm
Quoting remon78eg
Thanks For All, Sorry For Late And Not Answer Questions, ---------- Method3 Discovered From 15$ To 2000$ In 2 Months {image} {image} {image} How It Works?? 1. Do Sell Only 2. Do Buy Only The Loss Is Bigger Than Win !! Just Invert Buy And Sell To Convert Loss To Win.
Sorry my friend!! .. i appreciate your work.. BUT it is from 15$ to 0$ !
  • #3,467
  • May 7, 2016 8:11pm May 7, 2016 8:11pm
Quoting Learning-fx
{quote} Sorry my friend!! .. i appreciate your work.. BUT it is from 15$ to 0$ !
You Don't Notice What Happen Yet!!
Just Give Me One EA Backtest That Can Start With 15$ And Reach 2000$ In 2 Months (With Fix Lot 0.01) Even If End With 0.00 After That.
  • #3,468
  • May 7, 2016 8:14pm May 7, 2016 8:14pm
Quoting sanmiguell
{quote} Or just stay away from this system. You can't win many and me told before. Waste of time! Just want to see 100%!WHERE IS 100% ??!!
Developing New Methods Is Important,
In The Future They Can Convert These Ideas To Working EA .
  • #3,469
  • May 7, 2016 8:41pm May 7, 2016 8:41pm
Hi Mr Remon,

This is just an observation on my part. I could be completely wrong, but it seems that when you first started this, you were on to something really good. Method 1 that you were developing seemed that it was going to work well. Then, some people on the thread started talking about different things until the idea was shared that you should buy on the up and sell on the down. You thought this was good and that you were going to develop this method 2 but not until you finished method 1. It seems that somewhere along the line you got distracted and got more focused on method 2 before method 1 was complete.

I think that if you gave your focus for finishing method 1 and tell yourself it is finished, and then finish method 2 and tell yourself, it is finished. Maybe this system would be working better? You are already talking about method 3 when method 1 and 2 must be flawed by some way because I have backtested this and it is worse than what was produced with the closest EA that represented method 1 which is APG 4 by abokwaik.

I hope you don't take offence by these comments but in my opinion, you need to go back to method 1 and polish it. Build a single method 1 EA. Then, polish method 2 and build 1 EA for method 2, I would even stay away from no hedge at the moment. If you have managed this, then move to method 3. Mixing everything together seems to have disorganized what was once your seemingly genius ideas about a no loss system.

If I am wrong about this, then I am wrong, but I appreciate everything that you have done. It has inspired me to building EAs and I am not even a coder.

I wish you all the best success Mr Remon, I don't want to see you fail nor get laughed by some. I know you can do this. I have full confidence in this!

Daniel
  • #3,470
  • May 7, 2016 8:59pm May 7, 2016 8:59pm
Quoting keydcuk
Hi Mr Remon, This is just an observation on my part. I could be completely wrong, but it seems that when you first started this, you were on to something really good. Method 1 that you were developing seemed that it was going to work well. Then, some people on the thread started talking about different things until the idea was shared that you should buy on the up and sell on the down. You thought this was good and that you were going to develop this method 2 but not until you finished method 1. It seems that somewhere along the line you got distracted...



Yes,
That's Right,
But I Reached Now Zero Power , (Zero $),
And Can't Focus In Coding,
And Every Time I Go Back Starting From Previous EA Version, Because Every EA Version Give Different Backtest Result From Previous Version (At Same Test ) !!
  • #3,471
  • May 7, 2016 11:09pm May 7, 2016 11:09pm
Remon,

Great work...

Forex has never been easy, and never will be...
If you don't give up, you will get it..
  • #3,472
  • May 8, 2016 12:04am May 8, 2016 12:04am
Quoting remon78eg
{quote} Yes, That's Right, But I Reached Now Zero Power , (Zero $), And Can't Focus In Coding, And Every Time I Go Back Starting From Previous EA Version, Because Every EA Version Give Different Backtest Result From Previous Version (At Same Test ) !!

remon , u better finish ur previous method first before applying new method.....

better modify v9 which was near to success with some bugs, just solve the bug....

for your information, if u always apply new method and increase ur coding with 1000 lines for applying new method and adjust with previous, ur EA will never perfect and come to end.

u better finish v9 with old 2 method and make new EA with method 3

regards
  • #3,473
  • Edited 5:10am May 8, 2016 12:29am | Edited 5:10am
Inserted Video

Quoting remon78eg
{quote} Yes, That's Right, But I Reached Now Zero Power, And Can't Focus In Coding, And Every Time I Go Back Starting From Previous EA Version, Because Every EA Version Give Different Backtest Result From Previous Version (At Same Test ) !!
  • #3,474
  • May 8, 2016 1:25am May 8, 2016 1:25am
Quoting remon78eg
{quote} Yes, That's Right, But I Reached Now Zero Power , (Zero $), And Can't Focus In Coding, And Every Time I Go Back Starting From Previous EA Version, Because Every EA Version Give Different Backtest Result From Previous Version (At Same Test ) !!
Too many irons in the fire!!!!

You need to focus on one Method at the time mate
  • #3,475
  • Edited 3:37am May 8, 2016 1:47am | Edited 3:37am
[Quote = sajib0189; 8.914.742] {quote} Remon, u meglio finire ur metodo precedente prima di applicare nuovo metodo ..... meglio modificare v9 che era vicino al successo con alcuni bug, basta risolvere il bug .... per la vostra informazioni, se u applicare sempre nuovo metodo e aumentano ur codifica con 1000 linee per l'applicazione di nuovo metodo e regolare con precedenti, ur EA non sar mai perfetto e venire a fine. u meglio v9 finitura con il vecchio metodo 2 e fare nuove EA con il metodo 3 per quanto riguarda [/ quote]


I agree. IMHO, I think that Method1&2 have a good potential. They still, however, needs a good tuning to figure out how to control the DD periods. Perhaps the mutual hedge between Method1 and Method2 is still not enough. Right now I 'm working on an external code that can handle the operation of the EA Remon observing only the equity trends.
  • #3,476
  • Edited 2:53am May 8, 2016 2:27am | Edited 2:53am
Quoting MasterGuru
https://youtu.be/pKKmzmeU5-0
This video represents everything.
At least in the course of this tread has inspired some of EA.
  • #3,477
  • May 8, 2016 3:22am May 8, 2016 3:22am
Quoting MasterGuru
https://youtu.be/pKKmzmeU5-0 {quote}
Quoting remon78eg
{quote} Yes, That's Right, But I Reached Now Zero Power, And Can't Focus In Coding, And Every Time I Go Back Starting From Previous EA Version, Because Every EA Version Give Different Backtest Result From Previous Version (At Same Test ) !!

"I'm pretty tired. Think I'll go home now.........And just like that my coding days was over."
  • #3,478
  • May 8, 2016 6:46am May 8, 2016 6:46am
Quoting remon78eg
{quote} Yes, That's Right, But I Reached Now Zero Power , (Zero $), And Can't Focus In Coding, And Every Time I Go Back Starting From Previous EA Version, Because Every EA Version Give Different Backtest Result From Previous Version (At Same Test ) !!
I think that your best bet is to take a step back, scrap it all and release 1 EA per method. Let the thread followers test the method or methods that they choose. The true followers are here to help and support you.

Lots of Love,

Daniel
  • #3,479
  • May 8, 2016 8:15am May 8, 2016 8:15am
you can put in the expert send email function when you open an order, and then open the orders manually, I use it in live
  • #3,480
  • May 8, 2016 9:49am May 8, 2016 9:49am
Anybody with 99.9 modelling quality backtest?
0 traders viewing now