Accumulative Profits Grid System

I've not done anything special. I just like running them through strategy tester to find the best settings before I forward test. I am satisfied now with my findings that now I am forward testing. I am so fascinated by the action the EA takes to open and close positions, strategy testing is great in visual tickmode. Forward testing is like watching paint dry but it needs to be done!

As far as the part of mastering the strategy, I guess some of Steve Hopwood's whip has rubbed off me. He is constantly not accepting newbie kind of questions that relate to the user being able to find the answer themselves.

READ THE ENTIRE THREAD... Yes, it is long... I have before gone through threads that are over 250+ pages long from the beginning so I could know what is going on and participate actively and intelligently with other thread posters, even though this took me a few days to do.

WE GOT 2 VIDEOS, some very valuable EAs, even though there is too many SO WHAT? I have gone through half a dozen or more... even the new ones that I see doing strategy part 1. WHY NOT? If another new coder has got part 1 nailed, he or she is getting it and is ready to move to part 2. Just cuz Ab has made a phenomenal version of part 2 in APG 4.0, it doesn't mean that we can't get more coders to work under development.

This reminds me @onffone, YES your remon idea demo v0.3.mq4 works. It does part 1 as it should. You need now to move on and got to part 2. However, as it was suggested by another FF member, could you make the settings options a bit more user friendly? because not everyone will know what the settings PigBank is nor might they know what 1$1pip setting means.

MasterGuru is 100% right. I know we are all impatiently waiting for Mr Remon but he is busy and hard at work. From the beginning, how long did we wait for part 2 video? Many pages after part 1 video. He will deliver. It is always invaluable what he has left with us. The least we can do is put our focus on His strategy rather than others. Start another thread... I don't mean this in a bad way... As said, share the link. You may have others interested. This is not pointing at zigler. Many are deviating from the strategy points BIG TIME.

I've said it before and I'll say it again THANK YOU to everyone, even if all you have done was post just ONE POST.

Cheers with best regards!

Daniel

Yes Master guru. We are still waiting on Remon to create video 2. Other programmers have even told us that the concept is challenging to code. But Remon haven't told us its impossible. Let's still wait. Main why, Ziegler' s concept has the best option for DD, can't we run it as we have always done? It works for me.

Video 2 was created about 90+ pages ago???!!!!

Following......

I mean Remon's version of video 2

Here is just few hours of test:

#1 it's relatively huge Lots, using 0.15 Lot 7 Pairs on just 3k Account, try this with Original Ea..

Look those Vertical column of Errors, that's when profit has been reach and EA resets..

Yes, it's not much just $10, but it's 7 pairs, could be more and it's almost with no risk, as

Less than 10% DD in total and there is no doubt that Profit will be Hit whatever it takes,

Yes it could be longer, when nothing moves, but eventually it will hit rather sooner than later...

Who else's version of video 2 would it be? You mean his modification in strategy of closing only 1 biggest loser per 1 retrace. Although it will be good to see the video, we know this concept. A video is not so necessary unless I have missed something else that is changing. I've already said what is my opinion on this and that we need to define what a retracement is if we want only 1 biggest loser close per 1 retrace but it has been disagreed by 2 people here and said that I am overcomplicating the matter.

I have not seen anybody else comment on this topic and we are more than just 3 followers of this thread. Is there not another opinion on this? Please go back a few posts and recognize what Mr Remon is talking about, what I have presented, what zigler has presented and see if you agree, disagree with either views or whether you have your own take on it?

Thank you.

Daniel

Use the auto setup, just remember your broker number and name of server and passwords to input into myfxbook.com
let thier site do the number crunching. Let me know if you need help.

P53

Thank you!

Yes keydcuk, we had some surprising issue come up after we ran the video 2 EA from Khalil. It did not function as expected. I think that is why Remon has focused his attention on the calculator for now so we don't have to code, test and modify. When he is true with the calculator/ simulator, we will just input your idea, test it and see the result before they start coding. That is where we are now. But main while, can we test the Zigler? It has real prospect

Ziegler, I see many $10 from those 4 charts. I count 9. That is good. This concept even needs strong trend to make more profit. Range is not its friend. Thanks Khalil for the coding.

I've been going backwards on this thread to see where we lack. This is exactly what I was talking about with the APG 4.0. I've had members tell me that in some cases the strategy would sometimes close at a loss if previous trade closure baskets (sorry it is not the right term) closed in profit.

This is not the case. As Mr Remon points out, the only losses that should happen occasionally is the spread losses. So even though APG 4.0 is closest to part 2 of the strategy, there is something in here that is wrong.

I don't know where Ab is but I attach the file for anybody who wishes to explore.

Cheers!

Daniel

Brother, You please don't focus on Steve. Let it go. Let him be a super master but you never loose focus on your abilities. You canbe better than anyone else. Really, I can see your potential. Yes, Mr. Remon has put too much time and effort on videos and other stuff. He is doing whatever he feels necessary. Full marks to him.

Hello guys,

My contribution: I have change the APG_04.mq4 to allow 2 thinks it seamed important

First: "trade with the trend",
- inside a moving average tunnel buys and sells are allowed
- above the top of the tunnel only buys are allowed (strong up trends)
- below the bottom of the tunnel only sells are allowed (strong downtrends)

Second: After a certain numbers of buy/sell I increase the Lot.
example from the first to the 10th Lot= 0.01, from the 11st to the 20th Lot= 0,02, and so on....

Your point make sense to me ! Thank you for sharing your ideas. I think we should always "trade with the trends" because it allow us to catch the big moves...big money on this side ! And this way we avoid having big DD...

But i don't really understand your second idea: why are you increasing the lot size ?


Anyway, could you post your APG_04 version please ? It would be helpful for those of us who want to contribute to do some optimization/notes etc...


Best regard,
JB

Here the EA :

Thank you
I will put it on 10 differents pairs tomorrow and post my observation

I'm going to bed (3 a.m in france...)
Hope i can help you/us with my contributions...!

Best regards
JB

Hello. Which one is the right and updated EA for this thread? i just join this thread

Thanks

My English is poor.
Can not accurately explain the effect of each parameter.(translation by google)

extern double PigBankRatio=0.5;
--->video part 2 :Save 50% profit, for closing loss orders.

extern double step=60;// 60 point 5 Digits
--->open next order step

extern double StepIncRatio=1.5;// for Counter Order:step*IncRatio
---->increase step ,if Loss .

extern double counterwin=1;//Counter Orders Win 1$
---->Minimal Profit Close Loss Deals

extern bool UseFixLots=true;
extern double BaseLots=0.01;

http://www.forexfactory.com/showthre...50#post8854550

I am running AG 4 un-interrupted since yesterday. It has made some bucks running in a Net Loss of 51 bucks. Has made quick 23 buck sinceo Tokyo open on AUDUSD and 21 bucks on AUDCAD. Somewhere in London today, I am expecting a downward continuation of trend on AUD pairs so the situation will become more worse. Therefore, till now, better results in ranging markets. Plz keep the method pure as Remon stated. Don't mix it with anything else.