Accumulative Profits Grid System | Page 62 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Grid (not grid system) or horizontal lines indicator 6 replies

Grid, Burst Grid, Grid Risk and Grid Profit 1 reply

Forgot how to add MA to Accumulative Distribution 3 replies

The Accumulative Swing Index (ASI) from 'New Concepts In Technical Trading Systems' 1 reply

Accumulative Swing Index Indicator for MT4 2 replies

Attachments: Accumulative Profits Grid System
Exit Attachments

Accumulative Profits Grid System

  • #1,221
  • Mar 31, 2016 8:00am Mar 31, 2016 8:00am
Quoting AcerPhoon
{quote} Does this have anything to do with the strategy by remon or are you just advertising your stuff here? {quote} It surely is a good way to eliminate losers. It's just that I don't know if, for example, it would be better to close 5$ profit 10 times or close 50$ profit 1 time. You know what I mean? I am trying to find the best settings at the moment
@AcerPhoon

I agree that $5 x 10 would be better (at least safer) than $50 x 1 in regard to getting rid of deep loser trades, but it could be done only by automation.

Remon's idea - in Video Part 2 - is doing practically that... which is why we are "standing in line" for his EA...

(I can do a 5% close manually once or twice a day, but a 0.5% closure 10-20x a day is not very practical without automation.)
  • #1,222
  • Mar 31, 2016 8:00am Mar 31, 2016 8:00am
so this is another grid system EA?
Risk comes from not knowing what you're doing.
  • #1,223
  • Mar 31, 2016 8:18am Mar 31, 2016 8:18am
Amazing Idea, Amazing system, Thanks @remon78eg
  • #1,224
  • Mar 31, 2016 8:30am Mar 31, 2016 8:30am
I just test the last system from 2015.5.14-2016.3.31, the result is very good.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: TesterGraph.gif Size: 20 KB
  • #1,225
  • Mar 31, 2016 8:31am Mar 31, 2016 8:31am
Quoting AcerPhoon
{quote} So if you simply buy above the 34 MA it may work and you may aswell be profitable, but don't you think this is a whole other strategy? I fail to see how this may have anything to do with remon's strategy? Maybe I don't understand something you wanted to tell us?
Friend I got this and this topic
I did not create anything
I just think the following,,, do the tests
if you do not want to do tests ... let it go it
if they want to delete the message I just found useful
but as in all Forex topics ... always want to argue, complain ..
just talked to test
  • #1,226
  • Mar 31, 2016 8:36am Mar 31, 2016 8:36am
Quoting dragonexpert
so this is another grid system EA?
Better ideas...?
  • #1,227
  • Mar 31, 2016 8:55am Mar 31, 2016 8:55am
Quoting rodking2020
I just test the last system from 2015.5.14-2016.3.31, the result is very good. {image}
What "last system" are you referring to?
  • #1,228
  • Mar 31, 2016 8:56am Mar 31, 2016 8:56am
Quoting rodking2020
I just test the last system from 2015.5.14-2016.3.31, the result is very good. {image}
this is 10k account? and in almost one year just 400$ gain?
  • #1,229
  • Mar 31, 2016 9:01am Mar 31, 2016 9:01am
Quoting AcerPhoon
{quote} So if you simply buy above the 34 MA it may work and you may aswell be profitable, but don't you think this is a whole other strategy? I fail to see how this may have anything to do with remon's strategy? Maybe I don't understand something you wanted to tell us?

I agree Acer... this thread is full of newbs who don't have a Friggin CLUE WTF is going on. This is a STRICKLY PRICE EA.

NO MA's

NO MACD

NO Nothing people!

This EA Runs on Price alone.

But no matter what we say they will keep posting this BS about filters and stop times and $1,000 accounts that will BLOW UP ON THEM!
  • #1,230
  • Mar 31, 2016 9:02am Mar 31, 2016 9:02am
here is my results ... i started today after lodon open .. latest robot .. roboforex broker with 1:500 leverage .. let c.. i still confuse how master guru was closed robot daily with + 5% because i did not c still floating + pips .. so im confuse ..
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Image1.png Size: 59 KB
  • #1,231
  • Mar 31, 2016 9:03am Mar 31, 2016 9:03am
Quoting rodking2020
I just test the last system from 2015.5.14-2016.3.31, the result is very good. {image}
Many EA's floating here, so please mentioned EA name with results.
I Win, I Lose, It's my Job... And I Love it!
  • #1,232
  • Mar 31, 2016 9:08am Mar 31, 2016 9:08am
A lot of uncertainties in the second part, I can't write the EA without accurate data. Here is what is at the moment.
Attached File(s)
File Type: mq4 remon78eg part2.mq4   22 KB | 1,073 downloads
My topics: https://www.forexfactory.com/thread/1399775-vr-trade-panel-profe
  • #1,233
  • Mar 31, 2016 9:17am Mar 31, 2016 9:17am
Quoting ChicagoRob
{quote} What "last system" are you referring to?
I am using : http://www.forexfactory.com/showthre...98#post8844898
  • #1,234
  • Edited 9:42am Mar 31, 2016 9:31am | Edited 9:42am
Don't confuse the following comments with negativity - I'm heavily into grid strategies and would love to see this work out.

The fact of the matter is this: writing an EA that follows the strategy shown in the 'part 2' video is not that difficult - the issue is that the strategy (as described) simply won't work.

If you study the 'part 2' video then you'll see that everything's great as long as price trends upward (or bounces within a very small channel), but everything unravels pretty quickly as soon as price begins to drop below the lowest profitable buy order... that's because the buy-side of the strategy is tasked with building equity, but simply becomes an ever-growing floating loss as price trends downward, and the sell-side can't do anything to offset that because it's designed to close itself with little to no profit.

What's actually needed is an adaptive mechanism that switches the roles of the sell and buy grids as and when required to ensure that an appropriate hedge can be maintained with sufficient equity to offset the losing side of the grid if the market starts to trend.
  • #1,235
  • Mar 31, 2016 9:34am Mar 31, 2016 9:34am
Thanks Voldemar

You are really a fast coder!
Persistence will get it. Consistency will keep it.
  • #1,236
  • Mar 31, 2016 9:42am Mar 31, 2016 9:42am
Quoting Voldemar227
A lot of uncertainties in the second part, I can't write the EA without accurate data. Here is what is at the moment. {file}

I just quickly plopped this EA on my chart. Yes you are right its messed up.

Voldemar you should be proud of the EA you posted yesterday is the final one that works as far as I am concerned.

Thank You so much for coding it.

I doubt that remon can make his better...we shall see.
  • #1,237
  • Mar 31, 2016 9:46am Mar 31, 2016 9:46am
Quoting PipBank
Don't confuse the following comments with negativity - I'm heavily into grid strategies and would love to see this work out. The fact of the matter is this: writing an EA that follows the strategy shown in the 'part 2' video is not that difficult - the issue is that the strategy (as described) simply won't work. If you study the 'part 2' video then you'll see that everything's great as long as price trends upward (or bounces within a very small channel), but everything unravels pretty quickly as soon as price begins to drop below the lowest profitable...

I agree I no think this part 2 will work either. The EA from Voldemar from yesterday is the MASTER PIECE!!!!
  • #1,238
  • Mar 31, 2016 9:47am Mar 31, 2016 9:47am
Quoting rodking2020
I just test the last system from 2015.5.14-2016.3.31, the result is very good. {image}
Hello, please test start 2014 , in my tests the EA crash this year... in a long down or up trend the EA need countertrade or hedge to close deep red trades in Profit...
  • #1,239
  • Mar 31, 2016 9:51am Mar 31, 2016 9:51am
Quoting us fantasy
here is my results ... i started today after lodon open .. latest robot .. roboforex broker with 1:500 leverage .. let c.. i still confuse how master guru was closed robot daily with + 5% because i did not c still floating + pips .. so im confuse .. {image}
@usfantasy

I was visually observing EQUITY GAIN for the day and when it has reached +5%, I have used a "CloseAll" script. Nevertheless, statistically I am not sure if it was worthwhile or made any difference...

Floating pips will be ALWAYS in loss with this EA.
  • #1,240
  • Mar 31, 2016 9:56am Mar 31, 2016 9:56am
Quoting PipBank
Don't confuse the following comments with negativity - I'm heavily into grid strategies and would love to see this work out. The fact of the matter is this: writing an EA that follows the strategy shown in the 'part 2' video is not that difficult - the issue is that the strategy (as described) simply won't work. If you study the 'part 2' video then you'll see that everything's great as long as price trends upward (or bounces within a very small channel), but everything unravels pretty quickly as soon as price begins to drop below the lowest profitable...
Let say sell side in video part 2 is "A" and buy side is "B" . In that case ea is closing A with help of B.
Now A side has the trade with maximum loss(the first one we close with help of B)
What if ea categorizes the side with maximum loss trade similar way i.e if the maximum loss trade is on B side, then ea use A side to close B side trades, if maximum loss trade is on A side(like in video) then ea close A side trades with help of B side.
0 traders viewing now