Dislikedok I don't want to use the indicator coded until I understand the first concept. Ive read it all looked at all the examples but I just don't get it! Can someone please try explaining how we spot the 5 candles.Ignored
atheer1
Bazza's Scalping method 48 replies
4hr - 1hr Scalping Method 9 replies
Atheer's pure line trading method 42 replies
Atheer's master trading method 200 replies
bo7a method... method for GBP/JPY 205 replies
Dislikedok I don't want to use the indicator coded until I understand the first concept. Ive read it all looked at all the examples but I just don't get it! Can someone please try explaining how we spot the 5 candles.Ignored
Dislikedok thanks a lot so here i have two examples firts bad trade and second good trade its correct ? {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Juan you are supposed to take sell trades based on red candles not green as in your 2nd trade 2nd trade green candle is not type 1 candle its type 3 if you suppose that its type 1 candle you have to take trades from lower thread not upper same faults apply for the 1st tradeIgnored
Disliked{quote} ok i understand thanks for your time i send you a Colombian Coffe !!!Ignored
Dislikedok I don't want to use the indicator coded until I understand the first concept. Ive read it all looked at all the examples but I just don't get it! Can someone please try explaining how we spot the 5 candles.Ignored
Dislikedok...lets see if I understood what a type 1 candle is. As he said : "opening should be in between lines(not on them)" So we need his "lines" indicator. I tried one here and I dont get the lines at the same place. And also: "for the bull one it should have a lower thread extending into other zones other than that of the open" Wich I think it means the wick. So looking at his picture 180 on #post 106, I can see the lower wick come from another zone/line and the open is in between the lines. And a more special type 1 candle would have: "its body should...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hi You can find it here http://www.forexfactory.com/showthre...18#post8781418Ignored