Accumulative Profits Grid System

Quoting Chake

Disliked

{quote} Because these two (combined +7$) are big enough to close the loss (-7$)

Ignored

Quoting IenDzi

Disliked

{quote} I think, because 4+3 $ is enough money to close the 7$ trade(the biggest looser).

Ignored

Quoting FXEZ

Disliked

I did a quick prototype of the strategy and came up with the following that is fairly true to the rules in video #2 as I understand them. Note: no trading costs were deducted and it was assumed that each fill was on the grid perfectly rather than allowing for actual price movements or gaps as commonly occur in trading. It can be seen that some time after EURUSD went below 1.25 that the equity curve went off the rails. Caveats: This simulation was done quickly and there may be errors in my analysis, that I usually find after a couple of days (this...

Ignored

Quoting mojepole

Disliked

Hi Remon, good luck with Your EA ! looking forward to test it. Appreciate ! greg

Ignored

Quoting Clipi

Disliked

good morning, I've been testing the EA, in flat markets could be very profitable. With a grid of 5 pips from 17:00 GMT to 22:00 GMT gives very good results. It would be interesting to add options: - Start time and off. - Stop Protection of a loss, for example 50% of the balance. - Automatic shutdown "X" time before and after important news. - To eliminate the option of increasing orders, all orders are the same eardrum. thank you very much.

Ignored

Quoting MasterGuru

Disliked

@Remon78 If the strategy is run on a "standard" account (i.e. without commissions), the EA will automatically take NET PROFITS, so there is no need to deduct spread costs (as shown at the end of Video Part 2).

Ignored

Quoting TheDirtySerb

Disliked

{quote} You need to make this clear for new traders because balance, margin, and lot size is very important if you're gonna stack lots like this. What remon is saying here is for a $50 account you must trade a cent account (Not Micro). The smallest unit in a cent account in MT4 is 0.01 (there is no 0.0001 option to trade in MT4) which is the equivalent of 1 unit of base currency which is the equivalent of a 10th of a cent per pip. Correctly it is referred to as a nano account. If you try to trade like this using a $50 micro account with 0.01...

Ignored

Quoting normtold

Disliked

Good work Voldemar, I have been testing this since this morning and like The DirtySerb I would like to the option to keep the Lot sizes the same and not to increase them. A trading time parameter like Clipi suggested is a good idea too as is a "stop nest cycle" and "force close all" button on the chart.

Ignored

Quoting remon78eg

Disliked

If We Want To Use Increase Lot , How To Calculate Lots To Not Blowing Up Our Account? First Lets Calculate Lots Size If It Was Fixed Lots, Say We Have To Open 100 Level With Levels Space Is 10 Pips And Max Price Moving Distance is 1000 Pips So, Loses Will Be 1000+990+980+970+...+10 = 50500 Pips So, We Must Have Balance That Can Open 50500 Pips If Pip Price Was 0.001 $ (In Micro Account Like XM). So, Minimum Balance Have To Be 50500*0.001=50$ To Use 0.01 (In Micro Account) And Init Fixed Lot Is 0.01 Till Now Every Thing Is Good, If We Use Increase...

Ignored

Quoting zigler

Disliked

{quote} +1 on that one.. Woke up to 7k Loss from 14k.. Using 100 Step ( My guess it's like 10 pip step between trades?) I think it's due to Margin calls.. program use 0.10---0.20---0.30-- 0.40 progresson And so on.. This is too aggressive, if you place EA on several Pairs, it will take too many trades, Not sure why at night I saw plenty of trades closed with -400+ Loss, I'm guessing Equity runs out of available margin.. Why not take progressionlike 0.10, 0.12 0.14, 0.16 and so on? Cause I saw 1 Lot+ trades open if you run one direction...

Ignored

Quoting SEro

Disliked

100 step(5 digits) is too dangerous for your deposit ) Step 400-500 will be much safely. May be step 100 will be suitable for @video2 EA because of position hedging, but it is not realised till now. Hope Voldemar227 will code it soon and share here)

Ignored

Quoting zigler

Disliked

{quote} Well, this EA already hedging, if you turn on option Buy and Sell.

Ignored

Quoting keithreport

Disliked

{quote} Thanks for all the sharing Remon, I learnt a lot since the start of thread form everyone, I have a question, from your calculation above does it look like martingale to you?

Ignored

Quoting Carneiro

Disliked

+ de U$ 1800 SUGGESTION: You could just put max drawdown (in percent) We could reduce the loss by 20% 30% 40% {image} {image}

Ignored

Quoting remon78eg

Disliked

{quote} What Do You Mean In More Details.

Ignored

Quoting MasterGuru

Disliked

{quote} @Carneiro How many days have you tested for this nice profit curve...?

Ignored

Quoting Carneiro

Disliked

{quote} I started yesterday I am using 1 EA

Ignored

Quoting MasterGuru

Disliked

{quote} @Remon78eg What I meant is that in your video when trades are CLOSED, they are triggered by NET profits on the BUY SIDE. On a STANDARD (no commission) account, the profits and losses already INCLUDE the spread costs, so there is no need to deduct spread costs at the end of your video. In summary: The final results are even better.

Ignored

Quoting MasterGuru

Disliked

{quote} @Remon78eg What I meant is that in your video when trades are CLOSED, they are triggered by NET profits on the BUY SIDE. On a STANDARD (no commission) account, the profits and losses already INCLUDE the spread costs, so there is no need to deduct spread costs at the end of your video. In summary: The final results are even better.

Ignored

Quoting tradeforlife

Disliked

{quote} MG@ Remon was calculating in terms of pips and that is why he was deducting the spread pips from total profit pips but what you are saying is also correct in terms of money :-)

Ignored