Quantum London Trading Custom EA | Page 27 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Quantum London Trading 4,442 replies

Quantum 00 Level Daily Trading 137 replies

My Quantum London EA Journal 82 replies

Quantum Physics and trading forex 74 replies

Short Term Trading is Quantum Physics 55 replies

Attachments: Quantum London Trading Custom EA
Exit Attachments

Quantum London Trading Custom EA

  • #521
  • Aug 24, 2015 1:05am Aug 24, 2015 1:05am
Quoting gizmo96
{quote} Hi Vlad, I figured out what the issue is. The EA is not placing any orders, or throws a 130 error message, when I only place a TP per order. I tested it yesterday with also a SL per order and then it works as expected. Thanks again. Kind regards, Gizmo96
Mine is placing SL and TP per individual order with no problem. Thanks. -Jason
  • #522
  • Aug 24, 2015 1:14am Aug 24, 2015 1:14am
  •  FerruFx
  • Joined May 2007 | Status: MT4/MT5 EAs/Indicators/Alerts coder | 6,542 Posts | Online Now
Quoting denya
Hi Vlad! Since some of us are experimenting with 4 orders in the session, it would be useful to add a table with the size lots for each of the 60 into the settings Advisor For Example: =========================== LOT SIZE MENEGMENT: Trade 1 = 0.01 Trade 2 = 0.02 Trade 3 = 0.02 Trade 4 = 0.03 Trade 5 = 0.04 ......... Trade 58 = 0.98 Trade 59 = 0.99 Trade 60 = 1 ========================== I have extensive experience in the "grid" advisers and similar displaying settings will make EA more flexible. This will increase the potential profit. Thanks...
Instead an input for each of the 60 ... it would be simplier to have a single input handled like below :

Inserted Code
input string LotProgression = "0.01,0.01,0.02,0.02,0.03";

... then simply set an array (ie. Lot[] ) with the StringSplit() function.

The lot size for each order will be found in the array position by the current opened orders ... If for example we have 3 orders in progress, the next lot will be the 4th position in the array.

By doing like this, we aren't limited ... The user input can be any number of lot size ...
MT4/MT5 EAs/Indicators/Alerts coder
  • #523
  • Aug 24, 2015 1:34am Aug 24, 2015 1:34am
Vlad, FerruFX,
I have a question:
Parameter "$StopLoss (Eg-50)" takes into account the margin requirements or not?
In other words. When will SL? When the drawdown of the open positions will be -50 or open position+margin requirements?
Stay hungry to be free...
  • #524
  • Aug 24, 2015 1:58am Aug 24, 2015 1:58am
hi Ferrufx
i have tried to backtest the EA,but it will test it in strategy tester from few days ago until today only.any idea why i can not backtest it for example from few months ago until now?
regards
fred
  • #525
  • Aug 24, 2015 2:07am Aug 24, 2015 2:07am
Quoting gizmo96
{quote} Hi Vlad, I figured out what the issue is. The EA is not placing any orders, or throws a 130 error message, when I only place a TP per order. I tested it yesterday with also a SL per order and then it works as expected. Thanks again. Kind regards, Gizmo96
Bug squashed!

Thanks gizmo96!

Regards

Vlad
Attached File(s)
File Type: mq4 Quantum London Trading EA v1.5.6.mq4   39 KB | 572 downloads
  • #526
  • Aug 24, 2015 2:13am Aug 24, 2015 2:13am
Quoting denya
Hi Vlad! Since some of us are experimenting with 4 orders in the session, it would be useful to add a table with the size lots for each of the 60 into the settings Advisor For Example: =========================== LOT SIZE MENEGMENT: Trade 1 = 0.01 Trade 2 = 0.02 Trade 3 = 0.02 Trade 4 = 0.03 Trade 5 = 0.04 ......... Trade 58 = 0.98 Trade 59 = 0.99 Trade 60 = 1 ========================== I have extensive experience in the "grid" advisers and similar displaying settings will make EA more flexible. This will increase the potential profit. Thanks...
Ok I will add this in later.

Regards

Vlad
  • #527
  • Aug 24, 2015 2:14am Aug 24, 2015 2:14am
Quoting FerruFx
{quote} Instead an input for each of the 60 ... it would be simplier to have a single input handled like below : input string LotProgression = "0.01,0.01,0.02,0.02,0.03"; ... then simply set an array (ie. Lot[] ) with the StringSplit() function. The lot size for each order will be found in the array position by the current opened orders ... If for example we have 3 orders in progress, the next lot will be the 4th position in the array. By doing like this, we aren't limited ... The user input can be any number of lot size ...
Thanks
  • #528
  • Aug 24, 2015 2:19am Aug 24, 2015 2:19am
Vlad, so far so good. This ea has been doing well for me!
  • #529
  • Aug 24, 2015 2:22am Aug 24, 2015 2:22am
Quoting bapakjason
Vlad, so far so good. This ea has been doing well for me!
Great to hear! Thanks for testing!
  • #530
  • Aug 24, 2015 2:23am Aug 24, 2015 2:23am
Quoting bapakjason
Vlad, so far so good. This ea has been doing well for me!
can you please share with us the setting for back testing?
fred
  • #531
  • Aug 24, 2015 2:34am Aug 24, 2015 2:34am
Quoting Vlad13685
{quote} Bug squashed! Thanks gizmo96! Regards Vlad {file}
Hello Vlad, the EA continues open only positions first day,
I delete Global Daily Cicles ,
regards
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: vlad.png Size: 39 KB
  • #532
  • Aug 24, 2015 2:36am Aug 24, 2015 2:36am
  •  FerruFx
  • Joined May 2007 | Status: MT4/MT5 EAs/Indicators/Alerts coder | 6,542 Posts | Online Now
Quoting fredgold3434
hi Ferrufx i have tried to backtest the EA,but it will test it in strategy tester from few days ago until today only.any idea why i can not backtest it for example from few months ago until now? regards fred
Be sure to have enough datas for the months back you want to test.
MT4/MT5 EAs/Indicators/Alerts coder
  • #533
  • Aug 24, 2015 2:36am Aug 24, 2015 2:36am
Quoting fredgold3434
{quote} can you please share with us the setting for back testing? fred
I am sure someone can, but I have only been forward testing with demo account using SL&TP on individual trades. Thanks. -Jason
  • #534
  • Aug 24, 2015 2:37am Aug 24, 2015 2:37am
Hi,

i've been testing the EA since its first version was provided by Vlad with many different parameters and had a good success from 01/01/15 to 01/08/15.

My goal was to reduce drawdown in order to be able to try this EA live on a small account.
I could reach this goal by setting the EA this way:

-Work only during Tokyo session
-5/10 max trades per session
-0.01 lots
-125 depth
-stop loss 20$

A more conservative configuration:

-Tokyo session
-3 max trades
-1 max cycle
-125 depth
-stop loss $20

Both of this configurations works really good from the 01/01/15 to 01/08/15 but literally blows up the account during april/may 2014
The only way for the account to survive is by setting the depth at 300 for that period, but this way i get worse result for the 2015.
As already stated by Masterrmind i believe, depth should be adapted everytime in order for the EA to work at its best, with or without SL.

Now i ask this in particular to MM and Vlad. Is there way to add an auto-adapting depth features to the EA?

Thanks,
theBlues
  • #535
  • Aug 24, 2015 2:43am Aug 24, 2015 2:43am
Quoting theBlues
Hi, i've been testing the EA since its first version was provided by Vlad with many different parameters and had a good success from 01/01/15 to 01/08/15. My goal was to reduce drawdown in order to be able to try this EA live on a small account. I could reach this goal by setting the EA this way: -Work only during Tokyo session -5/10 max trades per session -0.01 lots -125 depth -stop loss 20$ A more conservative configuration: -Tokyo session -3 max trades -1 max cycle -125 depth -stop loss $20 Both of this configurations works really good from the...
from a coding perspective, absolutely...

but what formula would you use to calculate what the depth should be at a given point in time?

Regards

Vlad
  • #536
  • Aug 24, 2015 2:44am Aug 24, 2015 2:44am
Quoting arkan1976
{quote} Hello Vlad, the EA continues open only positions first day, I delete Global Daily Cicles , regards {image}
Ok, I think the global variables could be messing with it. It worked on my side but might not be the same for everyone.

I will work on a solution tonight to code this without using global variables.

Regards

Vlad
  • #537
  • Aug 24, 2015 2:45am Aug 24, 2015 2:45am
Quoting Vlad13685
{quote} Ok, I think the global variables could be messing with it. It worked on my side but might not be the same for everyone. I will work on a solution tonight to code this without using global variables. Regards Vlad
Thankyou very much Vlad.
  • #538
  • Aug 24, 2015 3:00am Aug 24, 2015 3:00am
Quoting Vlad13685
{quote} from a coding perspective, absolutely... but what formula would you use to calculate what the depth should be at a given point in time? Regards Vlad
To reply to this question, i call upon the help of a more experienced trader like MM or any other.

Actually, a more complete feature would be an auto-adapting depth:lot size ratio.
About the formula i really need the help of a more experienced trader.

Thanks,

theBlues
  • #539
  • Aug 24, 2015 3:08am Aug 24, 2015 3:08am
Quoting theBlues
{quote} To reply to this question, i call upon the help of a more experienced trader like MM or any other. Actually, a more complete feature would be an auto-adapting depth:lot size ratio. About the formula i really need the help of a more experienced trader. Thanks, theBlues
Usually it is the multiplication factor of the last order.
Typically this ratio is in the range from 1 to 2 (Martingale).
But almost always enough from 1.05 to 1.16.
Stay hungry to be free...
  • #540
  • Aug 24, 2015 3:25am Aug 24, 2015 3:25am
Quoting theBlues
Hi, i've been testing the EA since its first version was provided by Vlad with many different parameters and had a good success from 01/01/15 to 01/08/15. My goal was to reduce drawdown in order to be able to try this EA live on a small account. I could reach this goal by setting the EA this way: -Work only during Tokyo session -5/10 max trades per session -0.01 lots -125 depth -stop loss 20$ A more conservative configuration: -Tokyo session -3 max trades -1 max cycle -125 depth -stop loss $20 Both of this configurations works really good from the...
Yes it can be implemented.

In its simplest form I apply the values dynamically.

Very powerful methods and only good if you can control them and NOT let them control you.

Masterrmind...........
Master your Mind then Master your Trades
3 traders viewing now