The similarity system | Page 660 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Similarity: A Practical Approach 859 replies

Similarity Trading - The ZZBB Method 215 replies

Rainbow similarity 256 replies

Similarity Stuff 17 replies

Directional Similarity 0 replies

Attachments: The similarity system
Exit Attachments

The similarity system

  • #13,181
  • Dec 6, 2014 5:27pm Dec 6, 2014 5:27pm
Quoting duplex
{quote} IMO if my buffers fail in 'pathological cases' so will the stats in those cases - right?
No, the RS indicator should work correctly in this particular case.
However, these are all minor issues (and would result in an error of the order of 0.1%-1% in stats).

A bigger problem that the RS indicator deals with bars, instead of ticks, the error obtained is certainly quite large, but this is the limitation inherent to MT4.

k
  • #13,182
  • Dec 6, 2014 6:51pm Dec 6, 2014 6:51pm
Quoting GU-Night
{quote} The only suspects are: you, Maximinus and FF-admin. Where the waters are muddy is something to hide. ~ Einstein

What a nincompoop you are.......

It surly was also Maximinus, FF-admin and me who were behind the EURUSDD scam, aren't we?
  • #13,183
  • Dec 6, 2014 7:08pm Dec 6, 2014 7:08pm
Quoting GU-Night
The only suspects are: you, Maximinus and FF-admin...
Why do some people think that Infinitus and Maximus are responsible for this? To me that makes no sense at all. And why do some people think that this is a conspiracy to prevent traders from being successful with TZ systems? To me that's not just improbable, it's laughable. You only have to see who hasn't been revoked to understand that.

The only thing I know with 100% certainty is that I am innocent. So if I suddenly become revoked then I'll know that all is not well here. And now you'll know too.

I hope FF Admin will publish their findings at some point but I understand if they can't do this yet due to ongoing investigations. Until then, I'm going to be more careful than usual about who I trust.

Best wishes,
NT
You reap what you sow.
  • #13,184
  • Dec 6, 2014 7:26pm Dec 6, 2014 7:26pm
Quoting NorthTrader
{quote} Why do some people think that Infinitus and Maximus are responsible for this? To me that makes no sense at all. And why do some people think that this is a conspiracy to prevent traders from being successful with TZ systems? To me that's not just improbable, it's laughable. You only have to see who hasn't been revoked to understand that. The only thing I know with 100% certainty is that I am innocent. So if I suddenly become revoked then I'll know that all is not well here. And now you'll know too. I hope FF Admin will publish their findings...

Why do people think that all of the TZ related thread starters are scammers? I know that’s not the case, because I have benefitted from it. And I'm not the only one.
  • #13,185
  • Dec 6, 2014 7:54pm Dec 6, 2014 7:54pm
Quoting GU-Night
{quote} Why do people think that all of the TZ related thread starters are scammers? I know that’s not the case, because I have benefitted from it. And I'm not the only one.

Maybe you are too part of the problem......

Who knows, will find out soon enough
  • #13,186
  • Dec 6, 2014 8:00pm Dec 6, 2014 8:00pm
This all gets more bizarre !

7 users have been removed from my buddie list,i guess they have all been banned,im left wondering what the heck is going on here,i have had pm,s from many of these banned members and the only topic mentioned in those pm,s were related to my thoughts and trading ideas,i was never asked for money or some private club.

It does not matter if you think this trading style has any merit or not ,things seem extremely odd,

ive been talking for months to some of these and i have seen nothing odd

umm scratching my head.

I would welcome that a notice of reason be posted

regards
dice
  • #13,187
  • Dec 6, 2014 8:05pm Dec 6, 2014 8:05pm
Quoting GU-Night
{quote} Why do people think that all of the TZ related thread starters are scammers? I know that’s not the case, because I have benefitted from it. And I'm not the only one.

Let me ask you a question:


with all the money the big corporations/banks have, with all the money they spent for HFT, quants, research etc., with all the very intelligent people they "bought", physicians, mathematicians, etc., people who, unlike most of the revoked members here, get their mathematics/statistics right: what do you think, how long it takes, until the newly developed algo fails again? Why are all of this brilliant people not able, to find something for which they can claim 99.999% probability (and which is tradeable)? What do you think is the chance, that a highly skilled mathematician will share his holy grail here publicly? Why do you think is it important, that new developed algos are kept as secret when you like to be as long profitable with them as it lasts?

My god, one has to protect some people for themselves........
  • #13,188
  • Dec 6, 2014 8:33pm Dec 6, 2014 8:33pm
Quoting infinitus
{quote} Let me ask you a question: with all the money the big corporations/banks have, with all the money they spent for HFT, quants, research etc., with all the very intelligent people they "bought", physicians, mathematicians, etc., people who, unlike most of the revoked members here, get their mathematics/statistics right: what do you think, how long it takes, until the newly developed algo fails again? Why are all of this brilliant people not able, to find something for which they can claim 99.999% probability (and which is tradeable)? What...
SWEET!!!
  • #13,189
  • Dec 6, 2014 8:52pm Dec 6, 2014 8:52pm
Quoting infinitus
{quote} Let me ask you a question: with all the money the big corporations/banks have, with all the money they spent for HFT, quants, research etc., with all the very intelligent people they "bought", physicians, mathematicians, etc., people who, unlike most of the revoked members here, get their mathematics/statistics right: what do you think, how long it takes, until the newly developed algo fails again? Why are all of this brilliant people not able, to find something for which they can claim 99.999% probability (and which is tradeable)? What...
I dont think anybody could disagree with this,

but this is a forum based on ideas and developing ideas and method .

virtually every thread and topic of idea should be deleted following the premise you put forward.

im more interested in why so many members have been banned .if foul play is at hand then fine,but if the ideas of descussion have been banned then every thread should be deleted,after all ive yet to find a thread started by a NASA rocket scientist

im not having a pop at you ,just cant make sense of any of this.
  • #13,190
  • Dec 6, 2014 9:02pm Dec 6, 2014 9:02pm
Quoting diceman555
{quote} I dont think anybody could disagree with this, but this is a forum based on ideas and developing ideas and method . virtually every thread and topic of idea should be deleted following the premise you put forward. im more interested in why so many members have been banned .if foul play is at hand then fine,but if the ideas of descussion have been banned then every thread should be deleted,after all ive yet to find a thread started by a NASA rocket scientist im not having a pop at you ,just cant make sense of any of this.

for example:

FF forbids promotion of "get rich quick" schemes

maybe, when you promote the 99.999% probability thing, it may fall into this category. Ain't it?
  • #13,191
  • Dec 6, 2014 9:04pm Dec 6, 2014 9:04pm
Quoting diceman555
{quote} I dont think anybody could disagree with this, but this is a forum based on ideas and developing ideas and method . virtually every thread and topic of idea should be deleted following the premise you put forward. im more interested in why so many members have been banned .if foul play is at hand then fine,but if the ideas of descussion have been banned then every thread should be deleted,after all ive yet to find a thread started by a NASA rocket scientist im not having a pop at you ,just cant make sense of any of this.


also my statement/questions were towards the theory, that FF-admin bans all the "successful" members/methods........
  • #13,192
  • Dec 6, 2014 9:06pm Dec 6, 2014 9:06pm
Quoting diceman555
{quote} I dont think anybody could disagree with this, but this is a forum based on ideas and developing ideas and method . virtually every thread and topic of idea should be deleted following the premise you put forward. im more interested in why so many members have been banned .if foul play is at hand then fine,but if the ideas of descussion have been banned then every thread should be deleted,after all ive yet to find a thread started by a NASA rocket scientist im not having a pop at you ,just cant make sense of any of this.

and again:


think about it for a while:


why have been so many people with "additional usernames" been banned, who were found in the vicinity of the suspects?

Why have all of this "additional usernames" been supporting the suspects?


Any idea?
  • #13,193
  • Dec 6, 2014 10:54pm Dec 6, 2014 10:54pm
I was baptized with 4 names. I hope admin and the beastie boys don't find out or I might be next to get banned

G
I read and watch to learn.
  • #13,194
  • Dec 6, 2014 11:32pm Dec 6, 2014 11:32pm
Quoting infinitus
{quote} and again: think about it for a while: why have been so many people with "additional usernames" been banned, who were found in the vicinity of the suspects? Why have all of this "additional usernames" been supporting the suspects? Any idea?
I do not disagree with your points,if foul play is at hand.

The thing that im not understanding is two of the banned guys who i had lots of correspondence with only ever asked and discussed related ideas ,in fact trying to find a missing link or establish better understanding.quite opposite to promoting for gain.

i personally do not trade tz,s or what ever else are being discussed here,and for most its a lost cause.having said that ,some of the principles of market structure within these threads can be extremely useful to traders who are fairly developed.

there are similarities in these threads which are similar to things ive been working on for some years now.

What i can say is the banned members i had pm,s from have not been banned because they have un earthed some golden shrouded holy grail .

Anyways
  • #13,195
  • Dec 7, 2014 12:54am Dec 7, 2014 12:54am
Quoting NorthTrader
{quote} Why do some people think that Infinitus and Maximus are responsible for this? To me that makes no sense at all. And why do some people think that this is a conspiracy to prevent traders from being successful with TZ systems? To me that's not just improbable, it's laughable. You only have to see who hasn't been revoked to understand that. The only thing I know with 100% certainty is that I am innocent. So if I suddenly become revoked then I'll know that all is not well here. And now you'll know too. I hope FF Admin will publish their findings...
NorthTrader, such people are not thinking at all, they are just speaking.

D.P.
Hunting High and Low
  • #13,196
  • Dec 7, 2014 1:01am Dec 7, 2014 1:01am
Quoting GU-Night
{quote} Why do people think that all of the TZ related thread starters are scammers? I know that’s not the case, because I have benefitted from it. And I'm not the only one.
Personally I'd be very surprised if all the people who got revoked were scammers. There may be other reasons involved, such as the abuse of other members using graphic expletives, or continual criticism of FF Admin. But it's puzzling that they were all revoked at the same time, rather than case by case.

I don't know what the reasons are, which is why I hope FF Admin will tell us in due course. I was just saying what I think the reasons are not (i.e. two people, not even Admin, bringing down many others purely because they dislike them; and a conspiracy to prevent people from discovering secret 99% probability systems). Such accusations are absurd in my opinion.

Hopefully this will be my last post on the subject. Emotions are running high and I don't want to offend anyone any more than I already have.
You reap what you sow.
  • #13,197
  • Dec 7, 2014 1:38am Dec 7, 2014 1:38am
ok,
i admit defeat. i have tried to make content here despite all the trolling, but even the people seeing some level of content here cannot contain themselves from posting trivia and feeding the trolls instead of adding value. so i have failed. i guess it is important to try...
all the best to everybody.
bye.
k
  • #13,198
  • Edited 2:51am Dec 7, 2014 2:36am | Edited 2:51am
Quoting infinitus
{quote} Let me ask you a question: with all the money the big corporations/banks have, with all the money they spent for HFT, quants, research etc., with all the very intelligent people they "bought", physicians, mathematicians, etc., people who, unlike most of the revoked members here, get their mathematics/statistics right: what do you think, how long it takes, until the newly developed algo fails again? Why are all of this brilliant people not able, to find something for which they can claim 99.999% probability (and which is tradeable)? What...
it is nothing to add more.


There is the only thing you must get . If some people here gain with their algos, even all of them (on FF) that are trading with their 100 - 100000 USD accounts begin trading it with profit eventually, they will not exert a strong influence on Forex market.

EDITED. Just for reminder, Average daily turnover on Forex is between 4 and 10 trillion dollars.

Best,
D.P.
Hunting High and Low
  • #13,199
  • Dec 7, 2014 2:45am Dec 7, 2014 2:45am
Quoting kprsa
ok, i admit defeat. i have tried to make content here despite all the trolling, but even the people seeing some level of content here cannot contain themselves from posting trivia and feeding the trolls instead of adding value. so i have failed. i guess it is important to try... all the best to everybody. bye. k
Thank you for your efforts, I have learnt a lot form you.
I understand your decision. All the best.
Such a shame this has all happened.
What's it all about? It's all about money.
  • #13,200
  • Dec 7, 2014 3:19am Dec 7, 2014 3:19am
Quoting diceman555
{quote} I do not disagree with your points,if foul play is at hand. The thing that im not understanding is two of the banned guys who i had lots of correspondence with only ever asked and discussed related ideas ,in fact trying to find a missing link or establish better understanding.quite opposite to promoting for gain. i personally do not trade tz,s or what ever else are being discussed here,and for most its a lost cause.having said that ,some of the principles of market structure within these threads can be extremely useful to traders who are...

from FF:

Commercial Code of Conduct
Any Member who makes money by providing a product or service to forex traders should be designated a Commercial Member. Commercial Members are allowed to promote products and services in the Commercial Content (http://www.forexfactory.com/forumdisplay.php?f=158) forum, as long as they abide by the following code of conduct. Generally, Commercial Members should be upfront, professional, and not be sneaky.

Please note that Forex Factory's Commercial Membership rules and functionality will be revamped in 2015. Your patience with the current system is appreciated.

I. Be transparent

Members who are associated with a product or service should make that fact obvious. There's zero tolerance for cloaking a company association with the intent of promoting a product or service (e.g., pretending to be a happy customer, etc.).

II. No Spam

Commercial members should not spam Forex Factory by posting duplicate content, bumping their threads, or flooding the website with worthless posts.

III. No Scams

Products and services that are built upon bad intent (i.e., the seller knows the service is not worth the price) are not allowed to be promoted on Forex Factory. This generally includes signal services, multi-level-marketing, and get-rich-quick schemes.

While Forex Factory does not evaluate every product or service promoted by Commercial Members, if one comes to the staff's attention, it may be disallowed if discretionarily deemed to be a scam.
1 trader viewing now