Disliked{quote} You sure the majority feel that way? Even so, if people found something of value in his "inaccurate" ramblings then surely that is up to them? I have worked with some very clever people but sometimes very basic things are beyond them. Things that you cannot necessarily learn from a book. Like common sense. {quote} I don't have the required mathematical knowledge myself so unless someone can point it out I have no idea. I just go by what I do know and what I have been able to research for myself. {quote} Yes there are some very gullible people...Ignored
Hi Neio,
just to be clear to not let the theme slip to far away:
Well done, when someone found something valuable in this thread or in that what EURUSDD said. Out of my mathematical knowledge and with all what he, EURUSDD presented with all the errors and flaws in it, for me it is a wonder. So I look at the people who gained something here with another view, namely, that they more or less developed something, which they believed is the similarity thing etc. and made that work for them. If it works: great job done
The simply fact, that nowhere in the thread is an mathematical correct explanation of this all leads to some answers.
But that was not much of my theme here, when I started to questioning the people, why they still support a scammer and defend him, as would he be the victim.
Another question:
has someone noticed, that many of the postings EURUSDD wrote, got deleted later? Why is that?
There came his thesis to my mind, that the similarity thing is a Markovian process. He wrote many many postings about it to explain it. I only scratched my head at the time being. Later, when someone asked him about that, he paddled back with a bullshit answer.
After a while, all his Markovian postings were deleted without further notice that he dropped the theme. Did someone notice that?
How can one develop something, when one thinks that the thesis is Markovian, when in fact it is not?
Hands up! Who thinks the similarity thing is Markovian? Who thinks it is not?
