Disliked{quote} If you are buying EURNZD, that means you are shorting NZD which has higher interest rate. This will give you negative swap, not a positive one, so you'll be charged swap fee. Regards, BlackeagleIgnored
Tnx for pointing it out
1
uhmm .. last night I thought of one thing: if we know a point of attraction then it might be useful to know a totally abandons the point where power ends. This, to me it might be useful, for example, to find a good place to stop loss. Around I found the indicator COG (Centre of graity) but I do not like it very much because I want the center to remain fixed on one point ...Excuse me guys, and 'just a thought ... but what do you think about this?
A Positive Mind, and Positive Spirit lead to True Happiness
- #11,864
- Edited 1:38am Nov 9, 2014 1:04am | Edited 1:38am
- | Membership Revoked | Joined May 2012 | 1,218 Posts
{quote} Hey cfdtaleong (http://www.forexfactory.com/cfdtaleong) If BB will cut the PTZ it would also cut the middle bar. Except for that one thing we interpret it the same way. But you will never have such a vertical BB cut like on the left side on your picture (I have tested it with backtester). And right side of PTZ isn`t supposed to be formed yet (not like on your picture). I really would like to see (and trade) that impressive edge you see, but I can`t see it no matter how hard I try...But now let`s have some fun: Bernard Hopkins...
ok, and this is same picture with Sciurus v.1.7 h left and right =16, the rest is default and channel = 4
i combined with my Xixi TZ v.1.6 mod h = 16, and BB =16
and all of this is not 'counter trade' but 'following trade' if you can see what i see.. and yes my best indicators is my brain and my old eye..
and of course my more than 15 years hard experiences.. in this financial market that can support solely my standard of living with my family in my country.. lol
MTH
{quote} It is a great idea! I too have been trying to find a "time factor" type stoploss when it comes to similarity if that's what you mean, no luck yet but it is something that would be a game changer
I do not know if I understand what you mean, because it 's based on the concept of TZ (not similarity ).If I understand TZ correctly , there is 'a stop-loss period (H limit), but the concept of gravity' could also give a stop on the space
.This perhaps can 'help me to understand what I mean
Sorry for my english
- #11,867
- Nov 9, 2014 1:31am Nov 9, 2014 1:31am
- | Membership Revoked | Joined May 2012 | 1,218 Posts
{quote} However, a word of caution to the newbies, you can't trust those ideas until you test them extensively either manually or through an EA/backtester. The problem is that no one is patient enough to test & almost everyone is jumping onto the next new thing and forgetting about the basics. Read the thread from beginning to end not vice versa. Best, Jay
{quote} Two more things to add to the above: 1- There are 3 main concepts being discussed in this thread which are Similarity, TZ, and Sub-sequence Theorem Each of those concepts have many "sub-levels". Lots of people are mixing between the three and their sub-levels. Others are trying to integrate all 3 together. My advice is to focus on one at a time, master it, and then move onto the other & try integrating them together to have an extremely powerful tool. 2- There are many 'unproven' ideas that are being shared about how to use the above theories....
You reap what you sow.
For any one interested I made this last weekend. Its every post by FX-Jay(minus his most recent ones). https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Y3E7eU9LCtDm2Ehzq7RinrKG4uOjObnTDZKXmeHrLpI/edit?usp=sharing I tried to upload to forum but was too big.
)
You reap what you sow.
{quote} Awesome thank you very much sir! {quote} nailed it. finally bagged a sizable trade using these theories presented here. This stuff works like magic! Thanks again for EurUsdd and every one else iv been pming the past few days to help me understand these concepts. you guys are all amazing! Pip {image} {image}
"For example, suppose you chose your reals to be high of bars.
The on the daily chart if you set n=2 then you need to look in the DNA for 5 bars.
Let us suppose the highs of the last 4 bars are 1.2344, 1.2566, 1.2211, 1.2222, ?????
What will be ?????
Since there must be a decreasing or increasing 3-subsequence, the high of the next bar must be above 1.2222 or below 1.2211.
Just two options."
So I understood, that when we have 4 bars, which don't meet 4 conditions of sub-sequence, then we can predict if the next candle will be below or above some previous price with 93.75 % probability.
But I don't understand, why those 'rare' sub-sequence numbers will be targets in the future.
Regards, IenDzi.
- #11,873
- Nov 9, 2014 2:02am Nov 9, 2014 2:02am
I'm not a programmer and i don't like ! , but only I try to catch my view !
- #11,874
- Nov 9, 2014 2:03am Nov 9, 2014 2:03am
Thanks to PiratePip (http://www.forexfactory.com/piratepip) and to Fx-Jay and of course for EURUSDD and Kiads I save the file for FX-Jay posts as Pdf i downloade it from the link of PiratePip (Thanks for him) {image}
also beast trade explorer return...
Life's Good & Why Wouldn't It Be? Im a Pirate After All!
- #11,875
- Edited 2:59am Nov 9, 2014 2:25am | Edited 2:59am
- | Additional Username | Joined May 2013 | 724 Posts
{quote} {quote} Hello Cfdtaleong, if you could show a chart with sciurus indicator and BB indi and show where you would enter your trade it would clarify much for me and for others that are struggling.
Edit : I think there might be some logic conflict here where 1)We expect PTZs to end up not being TZs based on rules but 2)We are proposing to trade a PTZ expecting it to become a TZ. So this is where the PTZ position in relation to BB come in I guess
Will try to show examples next week if I trade.
I want more brain power!
{quote} Two more things to add to the above: 1- There are 3 main concepts being discussed in this thread which are Similarity, TZ, and Sub-sequence Theorem Each of those concepts have many "sub-levels". Lots of people are mixing between the three and their sub-levels. Others are trying to integrate all 3 together. My advice is to focus on one at a time, master it, and then move onto the other & try integrating them together to have an extremely powerful tool. 2- There are many 'unproven' ideas that are being shared about how to use the above theories....
)So I will continue to read in silence, as before, hoping to post the facts
.
{quote} Hey cfdtaleong (http://www.forexfactory.com/cfdtaleong) If BB will cut the PTZ it would also cut the middle bar. Except for that one thing we interpret it the same way. But you will never have such a vertical BB cut like on the left side on your picture (I have tested it with backtester). And right side of PTZ isn`t supposed to be formed yet (not like on your picture). I really would like to see (and trade) that impressive edge you see, but I can`t see it no matter how hard I try...
I want more brain power!
- #11,878
- Nov 9, 2014 2:52am Nov 9, 2014 2:52am
{quote} Hi Juri, I think this very powerful concept is not easy (especially for me
But you should separate those. Sub-sequence theorem for highs or lows, better not to mix those together, hence it doesn't matter if we are in a downtrend or uptrend.
And it is not possible to predict the next bar's high or low. The only thing we now for sure, the after 5 bars invalidated the theorem, we know the next 5 bars have high probability to validate the theorem. What to do with this information? Still don't know.
the 3rd wave is the crowd's wave
{quote} Sorry no chart I post can be better than Kiads. If you see his chart at #11867 the top TZ, I would have entered at the close of the mid bar or the close of bar the after if my eyes can see the BB cut the forming TZ at that time. Edit : I think there might be some logic conflict here where 1)We expect PTZs to end up not being TZs based on rules but 2)We are proposing to trade a PTZ expecting it to become a TZ. So this is where the PTZ position in relation to BB come in I guess
RegardsOrid peter
Oh sorry just saw your edit