The similarity system

Quoting juriFX

Disliked

{quote} I don't see any (potential) transient zones there. Price already retraced up to clear the two PTZs, so work is done.

Ignored

Quoting Eurusdd

Disliked

{quote} Seriously, some of you make my retirement from the thread for the rest of the year difficult! First, some of you have a bad notion of probability. second, some of you just don't want to open your eyes properly. Combine these two and we have disaster. Ok. Now, in the short-run we are assured(97%) that a previous h-TZ price will be h-recurrent the next time price gets there. Easy. But you must be careful because the value you choose for your h matters and 3% is still a huge value. Therefore, there is still a chance that p may not be h-recurrent...

Ignored

Quoting ninpojutsu

Disliked

{quote} Thank you. But have to go retrace a target price should not go into the area of TZ? This system is in the air, nothing is clear.

Ignored

Quoting Eurusdd

Disliked

{quote} Seriously, some of you make my retirement from the thread for the rest of the year difficult! First, some of you have a bad notion of probability. second, some of you just don't want to open your eyes properly. Combine these two and we have disaster. Ok. Now, in the short-run we are assured(97%) that a previous h-TZ price will be h-recurrent the next time price gets there. Easy. But you must be careful because the value you choose for your h matters and 3% is still a huge value. Therefore, there is still a chance that p may not be h-recurrent...

Ignored

Quoting Baillie

Disliked

{quote} Why didn't anyone show that before? Are you people kidding? I am done here, BYE

Ignored

Quoting NorthTrader

Disliked

{quote} Thanks for the clarification, Eurusdd. I'm trying to code something which will hopefully give a more accurate value of minimum h. Just one question - does the 97% figure include overlapping h-recurrent zones for a price level p? In other words, if 10 bars in a row all hit the same price, does that count as 10 successes for that price? Thanks.

Ignored

Quoting mehtabkk

Disliked

Hello Friends I am new to forex and learning a lot from seniors. I am presenting my trading chart. Time Frame= 30 M TZ= 48 (to cover the tops and bottoms of 1 day) BB= 24-0-2-Close smallcatzzfractals= default settings None of these indicators are mine. (LOLs) Just asking you guys if there is more room for improvement. Any suggestions Seniors? Regards {image}

Ignored

Quoting jackprobe

Disliked

{quote} Hi Baillie, i was looking your gray image from long time, and know that it acts like DS zone. Thanks for that. I am sure about revisit, but what i saw from Jay's post is Recurrent. So after revisit, it will be touched again (more than once touching the price p).

Ignored

Quoting GU-Night

Disliked

{quote} I have deep respect for the patience you have with people. Many people forget how difficult it is to live in a world full with noobs like Kiads.

Ignored

Quoting Kiads

Disliked

{quote} {image} My future dream... from h- to h+

Ignored

Quoting Zelo

Disliked

Hi guys, I want to share with you my indicator to test Eurusdd's Sub-sequence Theorem. Just add indicator to chart, and hit OK. Open expert tab of terminal panel and you will see somethings like below. {image} You may notice Low of Bar have high % than others. Although i check the code several times, as coding while learning, maybe there are bugs. Let me know if you find any. And this is my first version of Eurusdd's Sub-sequence Theorem indicator. There is alot of work to do like add some price action filter... {image} If you...

Ignored

cal <- function(tri, da){
trials = tri
res <- numeric(4)
for (j in 3:6){      # 3-open, 4-high, 5-low, 6-close
  success = 0
for (i in 1:trials){
    data <- da
    x = data[(i:(i+9)),j]  
   if ( ((x[1]<x[2] && x[2]<x[3] && x[3]<x[4]) || (x[1]>x[2] && x[2]>x[3] && x[3]>x[4])) ||
        ((x[2]<x[3] && x[3]<x[4] && x[4]<x[5]) || (x[2]>x[3] && x[3]>x[4] && x[4]>x[5])) ||
        ((x[3]<x[4] && x[4]<x[5] && x[5]<x[6]) || (x[3]>x[4] && x[4]>x[5] && x[5]>x[6])) ||
        ((x[4]<x[5] && x[5]<x[6] && x[6]<x[7]) || (x[4]>x[5] && x[5]>x[6] && x[6]>x[7])) ||
        ((x[5]<x[6] && x[6]<x[7] && x[7]<x[8]) || (x[5]>x[6] && x[6]>x[7] && x[7]>x[8])) ||
        ((x[6]<x[7] && x[7]<x[8] && x[8]<x[9]) || (x[6]>x[7] && x[7]>x[8] && x[8]>x[9])) ||
        ((x[7]<x[8] && x[8]<x[9] && x[9]<x[10])|| (x[7]>x[8] && x[8]>x[9] && x[9]>x[10]))||
        ((x[1]<x[3] && x[3]<x[5] && x[5]<x[7]) || (x[1]>x[3] && x[3]>x[5] && x[5]>x[7])) ||
        ((x[2]<x[4] && x[4]<x[6] && x[6]<x[8]) || (x[2]>x[4] && x[4]>x[6] && x[6]>x[8])) ||
        ((x[3]<x[5] && x[5]<x[7] && x[7]<x[9]) || (x[3]>x[5] && x[5]>x[7] && x[7]>x[9])) ||
        ((x[4]<x[6] && x[6]<x[8] && x[8]<x[10])|| (x[4]>x[6] && x[6]>x[8] && x[8]>x[10]))||
        ((x[1]<x[4] && x[4]<x[7] && x[7]<x[10])|| (x[1]>x[4] && x[4]>x[7] && x[7]>x[10]))
  
  ) {
        success = success + 1    
      }
   }
    res[j-2] <- success / trials
}
return(res)
}
 
cal(250025, data5)
cal(84325, data15)
cal(41790, data30)
cal(21075, data60)
cal(6139, data240)
cal(4425, data1440)

cal <- function(tri, da){
trials = tri
res <- numeric(4)
for (j in 3:6){      # 3-open, 4-high, 5-low, 6-close
  success = 0
for (i in 1:trials){
    data <- da
    x = data[(i:(i+16)),j]  
   if ( ((x[1]<x[2] && x[2]<x[3] && x[3]<x[4] && x[4]<x[5]) || (x[1]>x[2] && x[2]>x[3] && x[3]>x[4] && x[4]>x[5])) ||
        ((x[2]<x[3] && x[3]<x[4] && x[4]<x[5] && x[5]<x[6]) || (x[2]>x[3] && x[3]>x[4] && x[4]>x[5] && x[5]>x[6])) ||
        ((x[3]<x[4] && x[4]<x[5] && x[5]<x[6] && x[6]<x[7]) || (x[3]>x[4] && x[4]>x[5] && x[5]>x[6] && x[6]>x[7])) ||
        ((x[4]<x[5] && x[5]<x[6] && x[6]<x[7] && x[7]<x[8]) || (x[4]>x[5] && x[5]>x[6] && x[6]>x[7] && x[7]>x[8])) ||
        ((x[5]<x[6] && x[6]<x[7] && x[7]<x[8] && x[8]<x[9]) || (x[5]>x[6] && x[6]>x[7] && x[7]>x[8] && x[8]>x[9])) ||
        ((x[6]<x[7] && x[7]<x[8] && x[8]<x[9] && x[9]<x[10])|| (x[6]>x[7] && x[7]>x[8] && x[8]>x[9] && x[9]>x[10]))||
        ((x[7]<x[8] && x[8]<x[9] && x[9]<x[10] && x[10]<x[11])|| (x[7]>x[8] && x[8]>x[9] && x[9]>x[10] && x[10]>x[11]))||
        ((x[8]<x[9] && x[9]<x[10] && x[10]<x[11] && x[11]<x[12])|| (x[8]>x[9] && x[9]>x[10] && x[10]>x[11] && x[11]>x[12]))||
        ((x[9]<x[10] && x[10]<x[11] && x[11]<x[12] && x[12]<x[13])|| (x[9]>x[10] && x[10]>x[11] && x[11]>x[12] && x[12]>x[13]))||
        ((x[10]<x[11] && x[11]<x[12] && x[12]<x[13] && x[13]<x[14])|| (x[10]>x[11] && x[11]>x[12] && x[12]>x[13] && x[13]>x[14]))||
        ((x[11]<x[12] && x[12]<x[13] && x[13]<x[14] && x[14]<x[15])|| (x[11]>x[12] && x[12]>x[13] && x[13]>x[14] && x[14]>x[15]))||
        ((x[12]<x[13] && x[13]<x[14] && x[14]<x[15] && x[15]<x[16])|| (x[12]>x[13] && x[13]>x[14] && x[14]>x[15] && x[15]>x[16]))||
        ((x[13]<x[14] && x[14]<x[15] && x[15]<x[16] && x[16]<x[17])|| (x[13]>x[14] && x[14]>x[15] && x[15]>x[16] && x[16]>x[17]))||
        ((x[1]<x[3] && x[3]<x[5] && x[5]<x[7] && x[7]<x[9]) || (x[1]>x[3] && x[3]>x[5] && x[5]>x[7] && x[7]>x[9])) ||
        ((x[2]<x[4] && x[4]<x[6] && x[6]<x[8] && x[8]<x[10]) || (x[2]>x[4] && x[4]>x[6] && x[6]>x[8] && x[8]>x[10])) ||
        ((x[3]<x[5] && x[5]<x[7] && x[7]<x[9] && x[9]<x[11]) || (x[3]>x[5] && x[5]>x[7] && x[7]>x[9] && x[9]>x[11])) ||
        ((x[4]<x[6] && x[6]<x[8] && x[8]<x[10] && x[10]<x[12])|| (x[4]>x[6] && x[6]>x[8] && x[8]>x[10] && x[10]>x[12]))||
        ((x[5]<x[7] && x[7]<x[9] && x[9]<x[11] && x[11]<x[13])|| (x[5]>x[7] && x[7]>x[9] && x[9]>x[11] && x[11]>x[13]))||
        ((x[6]<x[8] && x[8]<x[10] && x[10]<x[12] && x[12]<x[14])|| (x[6]>x[8] && x[8]>x[10] && x[10]>x[12] && x[12]>x[14]))||
        ((x[7]<x[9] && x[9]<x[11] && x[11]<x[13] && x[13]<x[15])|| (x[7]>x[9] && x[9]>x[11] && x[11]>x[13] && x[13]>x[15]))||
        ((x[8]<x[10] && x[10]<x[12] && x[12]<x[14] && x[14]<x[16])|| (x[8]>x[10] && x[10]>x[12] && x[12]>x[14] && x[14]>x[16]))||
        ((x[9]<x[11] && x[11]<x[13] && x[13]<x[15] && x[15]<x[17])|| (x[9]>x[11] && x[11]>x[13] && x[13]>x[15] && x[15]>x[17]))||
        ((x[1]<x[4] && x[4]<x[7] && x[7]<x[10] && x[10]<x[13])|| (x[1]>x[4] && x[4]>x[7] && x[7]>x[10] && x[10]>x[13])) ||
        ((x[2]<x[5] && x[5]<x[8] && x[8]<x[11] && x[11]<x[14])|| (x[2]>x[5] && x[5]>x[8] && x[8]>x[11] && x[11]>x[14])) ||
        ((x[3]<x[6] && x[6]<x[9] && x[9]<x[12] && x[12]<x[15])|| (x[3]>x[6] && x[6]>x[9] && x[9]>x[12] && x[12]>x[15])) ||
        ((x[4]<x[7] && x[7]<x[10] && x[10]<x[13] && x[13]<x[16])|| (x[4]>x[7] && x[7]>x[10] && x[10]>x[13] && x[13]>x[16])) ||
        ((x[5]<x[8] && x[8]<x[11] && x[11]<x[14] && x[14]<x[17])|| (x[5]>x[8] && x[8]>x[11] && x[11]>x[14] && x[14]>x[17])) ||
        ((x[1]<x[5] && x[5]<x[9] && x[9]<x[13] && x[13]<x[17])|| (x[1]>x[5] && x[5]>x[9] && x[9]>x[13] && x[13]>x[17]))
  
  ) {
        success = success + 1    
      }
   }
    res[j-2] <- success / trials
}
return(res)
}

Quoting Kiads

Disliked

{quote} Let me Hug you for a while... {image} and... {image} check this out.. MTH {file}

Ignored

Quoting NorthTrader

Disliked

Hello everyone, Someone asked me offlist for a copy of my NinjaTrader TZ indicator, so I thought I'd post it here in case anyone else might need it ... {file}

Ignored