Whenever you feel that the market failed you!!!
Look at it from my view!!
You failed me
Look at it from my view!!
You failed me
Similarity: A Practical Approach 859 replies
Similarity Trading - The ZZBB Method 215 replies
Rainbow similarity 256 replies
Similarity Stuff 17 replies
Directional Similarity 0 replies
DislikedFollowing on from this post (http://www.forexfactory.com/showthread.php?p=7830420#post7830420), it seems safe to assume that the probability of returning to (aka "resolving") a potential TZ within h bars to the right of the middle bar is almost 80%, if h is set such that 3% of all the bars contain full TZs. But what about the probability of returning to a bar that isn't a PTZ (potential TZ bar)? In other words, a current bar that is h-left-recurrent, and that might stay that way (only h-left-recurrent), or might become h-fully-recurrent?...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Ow, thank you very much mate . Now i know that +/- k must be used in different situation (not at same candle), depend on sell/buy opportunity. And we must prepare our selved for "failed" signal, may be using stop loss, averaging/martingale can solve this. Thanks for nice post mate.Ignored
Disliked{quote} {quote} I have a different understanding. Let's look at some statements by Eurusdd. "Now, if you get the h and k right, you will find that transient price-zone occur with very LOW -probability. That is PRICES are h-recurrent almost-surely for some positive h." (PRICES not BARS/CANDLES) There is no center bar Only -h and +h (this EureKa literally just became aware to me as I write this so thanks for the question) "If your h is right, this probability should be about 3%. That is 97% of the time, at least one of the next h bars should hit...Ignored
Disliked{quote}YOU ARE THE ONLY PERSON who really got the idea so far!!! I see a lot of people disputing facts! Prices are 97%+ h-recurrent for the right h. This means that every-time a price is hit, there is 97% chance it will be h-recurrent. so if the last time it was not h-recurrent, it has 97% chance to be h-recurrent now. it is not the bars, you should count for the probability. focus on price!!! Less than 3% of prices will not be h-recurrent for some minimum h. For example, go back. if you find a price which is not 5-recurrent, go into the future...Ignored
Disliked{quote}YOU ARE THE ONLY PERSON who really got the idea so far!!! I see a lot of people disputing facts! Prices are 97%+ h-recurrent for the right h. This means that every-time a price is hit, there is 97% chance it will be h-recurrent. so if the last time it was not h-recurrent, it has 97% chance to be h-recurrent now. it is not the bars, you should count for the probability. focus on price!!! Less than 3% of prices will not be h-recurrent for some minimum h. For example, go back. if you find a price which is not 5-recurrent, go into the future...Ignored
Disliked{quote}YOU ARE THE ONLY PERSON who really got the idea so far!!! I see a lot of people disputing facts! Prices are 97%+ h-recurrent for the right h. This means that every-time a price is hit, there is 97% chance it will be h-recurrent. so if the last time it was not h-recurrent, it has 97% chance to be h-recurrent now. it is not the bars, you should count for the probability. focus on price!!! Less than 3% of prices will not be h-recurrent for some minimum h. For example, go back. if you find a price which is not 5-recurrent,...Ignored
DislikedI have a different understanding. Let's look at some statements by Eurusdd. ...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Yes, I was talking about bars, not pips (prices). Within the 21% of bars that don't get fully revisited, some of the pips within the bars will get revisited. So the probability of individual prices getting revisited is higher than the probability of all the prices within the bars getting revisited. Next job for me is to work out some probabilities based on pips, not bars. Thanks!Ignored
DislikedFor all visual learners out there &/or lazy asses that want their pips served on silver plate, here's what Eurusdd is saying in his last post. Check it out and thank me later ( eventhough I'm pretty sure you won't, you're way to busy figuring out how I'm faking my real results, no? ) I want to make it clear that this is NOT how I trade this concept, but the idea did start from here. This was the initial proposition, but I decided to to tweak it and make it work my way. If you managed to check my previous contributions, you would have realized...Ignored
DislikedFor all visual learners out there &/or lazy asses that want their pips served on silver plate, here's what Eurusdd is saying in his last post.Ignored
DislikedFor all visual learners out there &/or lazy asses that want their pips served on silver plate, here's what Eurusdd is saying in his last post. Check it out and thank me later ( eventhough I'm pretty sure you won't, you're way to busy figuring out how I'm faking my real results, no? )Ignored
DislikedI really hope all the lurkers appreciate just HOW VALUABLE the information Jay and Rahim have just explained....and to Eurusdd for starting us on this quest. If you can't create a Tradeable plan from that alone, to borrow a term from Sir Alan Sugar....you're a "Lost Cause"Ignored
DislikedFor all visual learners out there &/or lazy asses that want their pips served on silver plate, here's what Eurusdd is saying in his last post. Check it out and thank me later ( eventhough I'm pretty sure you won't, you're way to busy figuring out how I'm faking my real results, no? ) I want to make it clear that this is NOT how I trade this concept, but the idea did start from here. This was the initial proposition, but I decided to to tweak it and make it work my way. If you managed to check my previous contributions, you would have realized...Ignored
Disliked{quote} wanna bet that they will be asking the same questions after 2-3 new thread pages?! I give that a 99.9% probabilityIgnored