Disliked{quote} Could I make a cheeky request to have an alert that plays a sound when a new arrow appears.. true or false to switch it on/offIgnored
k
Similarity: A Practical Approach 859 replies
Similarity Trading - The ZZBB Method 215 replies
Rainbow similarity 256 replies
Similarity Stuff 17 replies
Directional Similarity 0 replies
Disliked{quote} Could I make a cheeky request to have an alert that plays a sound when a new arrow appears.. true or false to switch it on/offIgnored
Disliked{quote} Hi Jim, Can you please upload also the image for the same case, but with h_right=16? It will be easier to explain using your data. kIgnored
DislikedSo anyway you guys, I'm pretty tired of working for "the man" and have said many times that I will some day find a way to trade profitably, consistently...or die trying. I have tried and tried and did not die, so now I'm back to trying again. If you all help me I will most certainly help you. Eurusdd was very generous in sharing his knowledge and maybe I can give something ankle-high to that.Ignored
Disliked{quote} I think I understand this - but what is the main trend? Or how does one (eg. a calculation) know which trend (ie. timeframe) has been chosen for the trade? Or is it better to take time out of the equation and use range bars?Ignored
DislikedWow. What a nonsense I had to read within parts of the last three pages. Just go to the top of the page and open the link to the attachements made. There are enough PDFs to read and to get the info you need to make the next step of understanding some principles. Also what more on information does anyone need when reading this post. http://www.forexfactory.com/showthread.php?p=7808484#post7808484 ...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hmmmm, looking at this again after a while, there appears to be an error in my calculation and statement. Sorry. Let me go step by step and explain both the initial statement and the error I've made. In your first post the clearance probability of the end-bar (fractal) zone within four bars away from it is 60.48%. That means that within fours bars from the zone's inception, historically in 60.48% of cases the price went through the zone, i.e. a transient zone has become recurrent. In the situation after 16 hours, the probability...Ignored
Disliked{quote} The main trend is whatever you want it to be - random numbers here... you can test a main trend of 7 mins 36 secs and a counter trend of 43 secs. If a 43 sec divergence has statistical validity against 00:07:36, you have a basis to begin. You can do the same with numbers of ticks. The smaller you go, the more you will be affected by time of day, and you will need to adjust parameters for that as well. So, for a given time window, you have, say, these 100 different time or tick (or something else) ratios that have proven statistically relevant....Ignored
Disliked{quote} Stop speaking in math K my brain hurts Just joking. Thanks for your time and looking forward to V4! I'm think that h_right and h_left may be a little confusing? Peeps may thinks h_right is referring to the right side of a PTZ or did I confuse myself again??Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hi, the "true" transient bar is the one where the price has not revisited (edit: better to say, the price has not pushed through the zone) the mid-bar zone within h_right. The true fractal bar is where the price has not returned to clearing the end-bar zone. I'll put out a document which should clarify things, together with a new version soon. kIgnored
Dislikedyou are just LAZY AND IGNORANT. (this does not apply to those who have English as a second language).Ignored
DislikedTested today a scalper system purely based on m5 TZ’s. So far so good. 10 pairs, 10 trades, +/- 75 pips in 50 minutes. @Hilavoku, answer you this weekend, was this week too busy with thinking about TZ’s, because they can be perfectly used to hedge CZ’s, I think. No conclusions yet. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} omg, why ff. is not in French? i still have difficulties to understand. I am here from the beginning of the thread, read all thread of eurusd, And much more...realy much more. I must read 3 or 4 Times to be sûre to understand every word i read. but i dont give up, i am sometimes frustrated, sometimes disapointed, sometimes i hope, but i Will never give up. I Will never give up till i found something. I am sûre i Will found something in this thread That unlight my trading. I am an optimist by nature And i thank you all for sharing all...Ignored
Disliked{quote} how would you avoid data mining issue in this approach? I am a quant trader and this is i do but you have to be very careful to avoid data mining issue. Once you tested 100s of combinations, then naturally some will come out better than others - just based on chances. the more combinations you test, the lower the confidence that the best performing combination will have any real edge in the trading.Ignored
DislikedCycle identifier attached, this is the first time I've uploaded a file, hope it works. {file} {file}Ignored
Disliked{quote} The cycle-identifer indicator from Page 1 of the Thread looks great. Seems to me that if you buy on the MajorCycleBuy signals and sell on the MajorCycleSell signals, further confirming that the most recent different-timeframe stochastic mismatch occurred above your buys or below your sells, you will have very high probability trades. For trade closure, you could use the next MajorSellCycle signal to close your buys, and vice versa. IF, of course, the indicator draws these signals in a timely fashion. I mean, it doesn't ONLY look good in retrospect, does it? Does anyone have experience incorporating an indicator like cycle-identifier into their EA's code, so that they can programmatically look at the signals it gives? I will eventually figure it out myself but would be happy to get help.Ignored