Disliked{quote} Hi Jim, You are on the right track here, this is what I was talking about a hundred or so pages ago. Here is the image I posted to point this out. {image}Ignored
thank you.
Similarity: A Practical Approach 859 replies
Similarity Trading - The ZZBB Method 215 replies
Rainbow similarity 256 replies
Similarity Stuff 17 replies
Directional Similarity 0 replies
Disliked{quote} Hi Jim, You are on the right track here, this is what I was talking about a hundred or so pages ago. Here is the image I posted to point this out. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} So what was the point of saying that "the last 10 UTZs were all winners" if sometimes you trade towards them, sometimes away from them, sometimes anticipate them before they are completed, sometimes don't, and sometimes ignore them completely? For someone who likes to "keep it simple" it seems like your system is anything but. Do you see what I'm saying? Honestly, it's no wonder people get frustrated with some of the posts on here.Ignored
Dislikedwith respect to thread creator systems: stoch/BB + 1MA/BB: you are actually trading the diverenge of 300,1,1 stoch to Price Close when stoch cretaes diverenge which it happens way rare then the 5,3,3 setup you assume that price will test that level again. nothing magical. just a math underlying stoch MTF stoch differencies: is the cause of bar gaps occuers during the fast price moves. data feed fails to print complete bar on 5min TF but at the same time prints the bar at 1 min TF this creates a difference between two stoch calculations and again...Ignored
Dislikedwhy you see sucess with system stoch/BB + 1MA/BB: 300,1,1 means you are setting your stoch indi even 5 min to > daily number of bars means when trading 300,1,1 setup on on 5 min chart you are actually trading the DAILY DIVERENGE of indi, each day 5 min chart has 288 bars more over 300 bars are in category of %10 longest cycle period ( personally its been calculated years ago ) means 300,1,1 takes possbile longest cycle for any TF to create dievence. here you dont need to wait for the diverence dissappear to enter trade. you can start from where...Ignored
DislikedHmm lest see AU short, EU short biased and ditto UC long biased. This is out of what I normally do but lets see.....Ignored
Disliked{quote} So what was the point of saying that "the last 10 UTZs were all winners" if sometimes you trade towards them, sometimes away from them, sometimes anticipate them before they are completed, sometimes don't, and sometimes ignore them completely? For someone who likes to "keep it simple" it seems like your system is anything but. Do you see what I'm saying? Honestly, it's no wonder people get frustrated with some of the posts on here.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Well you have nothing more to worry about then, cause I'm completely done with posting on this thread. Good luck with your trading.Ignored
Disliked{quote} These are the kind of statements that are very disrespectful to the efforts made by others to try and help. Simply because you don't understand what is being explained doesn't mean the problem is from the person doing the explaining. Have you thought maybe the problem is from YOU not understanding? Too lazy maybe? Too thick maybe? Too biased maybe? Too tired? Too drunk? I mean, many explanations here have been spot on and clear as daylight. Give credit where it is due and stop whining like cry babies. And a little gratitude doesn't hurt....Ignored
Disliked{quote} LTE relax and understand ...well maybe not now, but in time you will realise...that you cant teach me nothing, because you dont understand nothing. just thinking that you descovered a secret about the market that allows you to make only winners, it is enough to see the level where you are in trading that beeing said, read again what i wrote: i didnt ask to answer to me, just asked vlady to answer in a precise way to a precise question with charts and everything but i guess it is too much to ask.... kids on internet...Ignored
DislikedThis thread has my attention! Page 5 has an excellent post on using stochastic dissimilarities as places to mark prices to which the market is very likely to return. Post number 89 to be exact. http://www.forexfactory.com/showthread.php?p=6785115#post6785115 I returned to this forum site yesterday and today I have an EA running that monitors for differences in stochastic values between timeframes and which will mark prices when the differences occur. I'm confident this will prove to me what eurusdd has been saying.Ignored
DislikedThis thread has my attention! Page 5 has an excellent post on using stochastic dissimilarities as places to mark prices to which the market is very likely to return. Post number 89 to be exact. http://www.forexfactory.com/showthread.php?p=6785115#post6785115 I returned to this forum site yesterday and today I have an EA running that monitors for differences in stochastic values between timeframes and which will mark prices when the differences occur. I'm confident this will prove to me what eurusdd has been saying.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Thank you for this. It's inspirational. As you and some others know, my dayjob is the big hindrance to a smooth run for me. So I am now taking serious steps to overcome it. I'd love to know more about your friend's parameters - I'll PM you. Eg. was it London only? Specific pairs/correlations? K.I.S.S. or did he look at Fundies/Tech combined? etc etc. I'm a strong believer in being able to replicate if the right questions are askedIgnored
Disliked{quote} I will after I've gotten what I want out of it; and then I'll share so much more.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hi Baillie ,your picture is too small,if you can show us another one. thank you.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hi Jim, You are on the right track here, this is what I was talking about a hundred or so pages ago. Here is the image I posted to point this out. {image}Ignored
Dislikedvlady, i have no problem with you, it is your choice to answer ot not. moreover, i understant the reasons behind that (work, testing hours and everything) i admit i didnt read the thread, well i did at first, then i dropped it, and yesterday i saw someone bragging about making 100% winning trades, and of course it lead me here. then i read some pages and all i saw was " i share with you im 100 positive trade in a row...etc on and on....and when a fundamended question with charts and everithing, not just a stupid one was asked, all jumped on him....Ignored