Disliked{quote} I am waiting for 2594. Will FOMC do the reverse, and going up ???Ignored
- #10,098
- Edited 10:03am Oct 9, 2014 5:01am | Edited 10:03am
- | Membership Revoked | Joined Jun 2007 | 3,782 Posts
Similarity: A Practical Approach 859 replies
Similarity Trading - The ZZBB Method 215 replies
Rainbow similarity 256 replies
Similarity Stuff 17 replies
Directional Similarity 0 replies
Disliked{quote} When you have a 90+% profitable trade (based on the system settings), you have the advantage of playing with your R:R. I can chose to have an RR of 8:1 and still be profitable. However, if you are actively trading and experience enough to know how price behaves at certain points, you don't even need a SL. So yes let the price come to you(but wisely)
Ignored
Dislikedthis is my statement, demo acc start 2 oktober 2014 - 8 oktober 2014 drawdown and loss trade cause is im wrong see chart because sleepy, and make wrong order very amazing system!! {image}Ignored
DislikedHi, {image} Not sure if this will help some people or not; however, I am hoping at the very least it sparks discussion so that we are clear on what the TZ's actual mean and how to spot them etc. My chart could be way off along with my calculations so happy for feedback. If you look at the image I have drawn either a black line, or if more than one pip movement drawn a black box. This line or box is only drawn at areas of price where the prior six bars or post six bars are not touched by another bar. This is how I am interpreting H. There is a mid-bar...Ignored
DislikedNot sure if this helps ,but for those scalping using variations of this methodology,ive established that there is a constant that can be used,that constant is that price returns within 10 to 30 pips distance is 66 % ,with less than 1% deviation from that. DiceIgnored
DislikedNot sure if this helps ,but for those scalping using variations of this methodology,ive established that there is a constant that can be used,that constant is that price returns within 10 to 30 pips distance is 66 % ,with less than 1% deviation from that. DiceIgnored
Disliked{quote} I can see setting up a probability to reverse or continue a known break, i.e. left-side formed - by varying the right side as time marches on and/or looking into the future, since the probability exhibits logarithmic decay. However, this is essentially using TZ's as resistance, and EURUSDD warned against this. The premise, knowing the probability of a TZ being cleared in x,y,z time, means one may trade towards or away from the zone. How to go from this to calling a specific target that is not itself a TZ, with accurate probability based...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Any talk of interest rates and the dollar will go nuts.. be aware!Ignored
Disliked{quote} Lol, this pretty much summarizes my whole experience with trading. But to your point, we really have no idea how EURUSDD comes up with his predictions. I imagine it's more than 1 chart, 1 tf and only TZ's. For instance, he premised the discussion on TZ's by saying it was the first of 7 steps to making price our biatch... or, something like that. I've been racking my brain to find the magic in one TF and 1 chart and TZ's only, but am starting to wonder if more must be incorporated to unlock full potential.Ignored
DislikedThere is a zone around 2765. At TF H4, it is not yet COBB, but @H1 we can see COBB. May be it will go down a little, before reach 2765.Ignored
DislikedThere is a zone around 2765. At TF H4, it is not yet COBB, but @H1 we can see COBB. May be it will go down a little, before reach 2765.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Bulls have taken over for the short term. yesterdays move was suprisingIgnored
Disliked{quote} No more suprised with current price action. Bulls in control. Buying dips expect things changeIgnored
Disliked{quote} Thank you very much kprsa and Vlady. I'm long on NZD to 7964 and CHF short to 9440. From the longer term charts.Ignored