Funny Looking Rectangles & Useless Drivel

According to my timezone;

1. The poster "zeroed" in at 9:32 pm Aug 2.
2. iDoubleStoch's last post (where he undeniably signs off) was made at 5:59 am Aug 2. So he must be even better at predicting the future than initially thought

My goodness someone else is not getting fooled. I may no be the only one walking alone in the forex wilderness (:
Signs of life are good.

Is it impossible for you guys to post something relevant to trading? Or are you going to continue to gossip like a bunch of old women about theories of who the thread starter is? This is getting absurd.

Definitely

Buy at support

Sell at resistance

Watch price action

Keep you lot sizes small

Be patient

Get a wage or salaried job until your account is large enough to support you with minimal risk.

Good luck

LOL thanks Jmn

Here's a rectangle and other useless drivel, enjoy

They are pretty.

I assume the useless drivel is the squiggly lines! lol

How did you select the starting point for the rectangle?

Based upon the instructions of the thread starter pg 1, did you read the thread yet?

Yeah, Ignore the squiggly lines, they mean nothing

Since I forgot to turn off "email notification" on ForexFactory, I got more emails than I wanted in my inbox. So, having checked those emails, I came back here and found the following "Useless Drivel:"

First, when I make an appearance on a forum like this once a year, I hardly ever remember my old password and end up having to establish a new account. Second, I was the original StealthTrader in free forums before someone decided to register that specific domain name and use it for their own commercial purposes. And, before that I was TradeVector for a number of years doing live trade calls in forums and maintaining email lists of others interested in learning about my work, until that because too much of a chore. Yet, in over a decade, nobody can find a single person who has ever been sold anything and all they do find are threads like this one, where I introduce a new concept that I researched from scratch and people just like you bring your irrational trash into the middle of it to destroy it because you don't like it - it does no appeal to you - you don't understand it, therefore it has no merit (because you struggle with its tenets).

You also forgot Veyron 16.4. I took that username on because it represented one of the vehicles I own. You also forgot Phenom 300. I took that username because it represented one of the three (3) aircraft that I own. So, if you clowns have truly been following me, then you know what I'm all about. I'm all about High Performance in everything I do. If have difficulty keeping up with that concept, that's not my fault.

I will have a new username in 2017, too. It will be PC-24. Google it, if you don't know what it is already. So, expect MORE usernames from me in the future. I use usernames that have special meaning to me and/or my work in the trading business. I will probably forget the password to this iDoubleStoch account a year from now, only time will tell.

Here are some other usernames I'd like to put on reserve right now for the future:

- Huayra C9
- Agera-R 237
- PC-24 2017

I would love to add some Ferraris to the family but I refuse to buy used and I am not on their "VIP" list. If someone wants to give up a slot, I'll "consider" buying a slot (I've heard that's been done before), but I refuse to buy used just to get "in line." I will continue to write letters of concern to Ferrari HQ, as I have in the past and hopefully those letter will soften them up. But, I was not contacted about the La Ferrari for example and I found that to be rather insulting, after I had expressed my "sincere desire to join the Farrari family." It was a 5 page letter.

McClaren, on the other hand, is not so damn rude. They actually don't mind if you purchase one of their cars - in fact, they are excited whenever you contact them about doing so - or visiting the factory for a tour. I missed the P1 and I deeply regret it. However, the P1 is the ONLY supercar that I would consider buying used - though it would take a lot for me to do so. I want to be the first to own, not the second. However, there will be more very nice limited version McClaren's coming out in the future and I very much look forward to participating.

So, when do I have time to sell you a "trading system online?" I'm too busy trying to convince Ferrari put me on their short list - which probably won't happen unless I buy used and then work my way up. To heck with that - I'm not buying a used Prancing Horse. It is new or bust for a short listed prototype, not something that just anybody can buy off the showroom floor. Ferrari, can be somewhat arrogant in this regard and for those "no named people" (like me) who have tried to get on that short list, you know what I am referring to.

Zero sales receipts and a history of threads showing people new trading concepts. Who the heck runs a business like that? For more than a decade? Use your BRAIN for more than a hat rack and you'd be more than an 8th of the trader you are today, instead of sitting around for more than 10 years waiting for someone to sell you something that's never (ever) going to be for sale. Traders trade and Vendors sell. Do you see the words Vendor imprinted on my forehead anywhere?

You were given a fairly competent idea in this thread and what did you do with it? Instead of learning (like other motivated people inside this thread) how to use the darn thing, you thought you were saving people from some ill fate. All the while, screwing yourself out of an opportunity to learn something.

Have you looked at what some of the people here are doing with this silly little box? If they can get creative with it, what's wrong with you? That was the point of the thread - to get you to THINK on your own - WITHOUT me. You don't need me. You don't need some damn Guru spouting off about "Tier 1" monopolistic bandwagons and how you should "dance" with the devil. What you need to is to get your BRAIN in gear and start getting creative. Take responsibility for your success as a Trader. You were given something that you NEVER saw before - period. If you can tell me that you've seen B2i before, I'll eat my hat. There are many more market structure concepts to be found, but you will need to engage your brain in order to find them.

You've been following me for a long time? Really? If you had been following me and READING the threads that were put up over the course of more than 10 years, then you would already know by now what I'm all about. The very fact that you came in here, perpetrating a fraud as some kind of discoverer of a clandestine hidden sales message, pretending to "know me" while not understanding one darn thing about me, is proof positive that you have NOT been following my work all these years. If you had, then you would already know that I come on line for the Newbie and the Novice whom I know will not learn a damn thing from guys like YOU.

I don't trade Retail Accounts and Retail Platforms anymore in production trading - YOU do. You NEED what was offered in this thread, whether you have the intestinal fortitude to admit or not. But, whether you do or not, is your problem - not mine - nor the problem of anyone else in here.


Can you name somebody who got scammed? Of course, you can't because you just pulled that line straight out of your rear end. NAME someone who got scammed. NAME someone who was sold something? Whenever one of you circus clowns come into one of my threads to disrupt it like this, such that other people suffer behind your slurry and disgusting behavior, you always fail miserably to IDENTIFY what the heck was sold, or WHO got scammed. You never have a NAME, nor do you ever produce sales receipt, or so much as a single photo of what you claim was sold. After more than 10 years, you should be able to produce some hard evidence of what's been sold. Where is that evidence?


Investigating someone giving away information in a trading forum? That's beyond idiotic. That's in the realm of brain damaged. You can't even spell out what TCD means, yet you've been investigating me? If you have been investigating me, then what does TCD stand for and explain to me how the concepts works. Can you do that? Of course, not. That's too much of a task for you.

People like you are some of the biggest frauds in the online trading community - bar none.

You do the work of the Retail Bucket Shops who DO NOT WANT new traders to become successful, because it cuts against the grain of their business models, where they COUNT on you blowing your account because they are taking positions against you and you are trading against their proprietary liquidity providers within their own sequestered pool/market. All the while, you actually think your trades are reaching the real Interbank Market. I trade in the real Interbank Market - you trade in someone's proprietary liquidity pool on some server in New York, Chicago or Boston. You are NOT trading real Interbank Rates as a Retail Bucket Shop Trader.

You need to work your way out of Retail Hell, before your Bid or Ask ever reaches the light of day on the real Interbank. Get that through your thick skull. You are sitting here waiting for something that will never be sold to you, instead of taking the information and RUNNING with it like others have done here. What a waste. If you want to be a mediocre Trader for the remainder of your trading career, then that's your business. However, that's not what I'm about and that is not what real motivated (hungry) Traders are about either. Take the ideas and FIND A WAY to use the information given.

If you can sit here, watch the market respond to B2i the way it does and STILL harbor the belief that there are no repeatable patterns in the market, then you deserve to be a mediocre Trader for the remainder of your stint in this business. Trading is NOT for everyone, as I said earlier. I used to think that anybody can trade - I have long since dropped that belief. There are some people out there who are too damn myopic to even THINK about opening up an account with real cash. Just save your money and stick it in a Treasure Note, you'd be better off in the long run, as long as the Federal Reserve stops running the US economy into bubble after bubble and Middle American Incomes have a chance to be redeemed long term.

Investigating me? You can't investigate your own shoelaces in the morning, let alone tie them yourself. And, you call yourself investigating someone? Give it a break, Savior. You are clueless and will forever be clueless. But, most importantly, people like you end up ruining opportunities to learn something of value for serious minded Traders who are new to the business and who don't learn a damn thing from comics such as yourself. You embarrass yourself with silly comments such as, "I've investigated him." How the heck can you possibly investigate someone you have never met and know absolutely nothing about. Wake up. More importantly, grow the heck up.


Logic dictates that the argument you just made argues against itself. Do you really want to have a conversation about logic? I always find it entertaining when one making an illogical and irrational statement tells others to use logic to solve their own problems.

If the markets are truly random (which is precisely what a "reflection of human feelings" implies), then you don't stand a snowball's chance of ever being long-term profitable and you are relinquished to the realm of perpetual guessing. Perpetual guesswork can never serve the needs of the thoughtful trader long-term. Why? Because, when the market moves between phases 2 through 4, those who are trading on "a reflection of human feelings" always get eaten alive.

You are light years behind in your thought process as a Trader. There is a level of trading going on out there that you are not even remotely conscious or aware of. And, until you do the necessary homework and learn how to explore the data in ways that you clearly don't understand right now, you will have a hard time understanding that predictability in the financial markets is far more common than you know - IF - you understand the data and its structure.

You are so caught up in "Tradition" and "Convention," that you will never come to see the light of day or the value of hard data research.


Your fundamental problem is that you cannot read. Every question you have asked has already been answered inside this thread and you don't have to read the "first 200 pages" to understand it!. There are only 15-17 pages in this entire thread - yet there is more profit generating material presented here, than in countless numbers of threads that I have read in certain online forums to date.

Because you fail to read in context, you repeatedly ask absurd questions that have already been asked and answered, or answered outright without EVER anyone having to ask me a question. Your reading and comprehension skills need work. That's the real issue for you. You need to learn to READ in context. Others have done that, what's wrong with you? You have not asked a single solitary question that has not already been answered not just once, but multiple times already inside this thread.

What did I say in one of my posts inside this thread?: WHEN THE STUDENT IS READY THE TEACHER WILL APPEAR.

Apparently, you did not take that to heart because after I left the first time, you came at the end of the thread, repeated questions that had already been answered and you did it in full plain view. So, there is no excuse for your failure to read in context. Everyone of your questions has an answer inside this thread. I am not going to repeat them for you now. Either you get it, or you don't. I am NOT your Guru - which is something that I stated many times before when I do these visits. I am not here to hand you my years worth of work on a silver platter which would be impossible to do with a fully integrated trading system, even if I wanted to, and I don't.

You were given ONE (1) idea in this thread. That's all you had to focus on. One very useful idea. You were told that it was Version 1.0 from the prototype concept that I created many years ago. You were told that a Version 5.x existed in another form within my current trading model. You were told that the other form was not for public consumption and not for sale at any price. You were told that you would have to put on your thinking cap and do some work yourself to fill in some of the gaps that I could not fill in, because doing so would by definition require more detailed explanation of a much larger and fully integrated trading system that I am not divulging. But, did you read any of that? Of course, not. You read none of it. You just ran in here and through up some bull crap about how nobody gave you anything to work with, or how what was given to you was not useful.

Let me clue you into something. I spent approximately 3 straight months trading NOTHING but B2i in a live (real cash) account many years ago. That's how intrigued I was with the concept and that's what lead me to continue pushing its development to Version 5.x. Working intensely with B2i every single day for hours at a time, caused me to learn somethings about it that I would have never known had I not put in the work.

Get off your duff and do some real homework.

B2i, single handily, can rescue your entire Trading Career, if you learn the lessons that it has to teach and if you start developing some common sense approaches to using it. I've have written about the limitations of B2i and how to compensate for them. Did you read that? Of course, not. I told you that compensating for B2i using a good directional bias (trend) indicator was very wise. I told you that in market phases 1 and 5, that B2i would see most of its failures because of its Version 1.0 limitations that DO NOT EXIST in Version 5.x. Did you READ THAT? Of course, not.

Look, pal. It is up to YOU to figure out how to accomplish the task of Optimization. I gave you the fundamentals in raw form. Use it, or don't use it - it is no of my damn business whether you do or not. This thread is like ALL my threads. You were told from the start that B2i was no holy grail indicator and that the thread was here to give you a good concept AND to help you open up your BRAIN to some creative input. If you had a problem with that, you should have NEVER posted inside this thread.

NAYSAYING TROLLS

You Naysaying Trolls came in here and did what you always do. Misunderstand. Misconstrue. Misapply. Miss. Miss. Miss. Miss. That's all you are good for is Missing the damn point - even when it is place directly under you nose! You see the patterns working on a percentage basis that was claimed before it happened and you STILL deny what you are seeing with your own eyes. You miss the mark each and every time you disrupt one of my threads and you never come back to apologize once your BS is uncovered, which says a lot more about your character and your real motives than you realize.

Now, GO be a better Trader than you are today. That's your task. Your task is not deluding yourself into thinking you know something about me. All you know is what I have willingly shared with you online. You can't possibly know anything more, so cut the pretense - you delude no one but yourselves.

When I come back here next year, I want to see you successful according to your own needs. Do you actually think that had I been unsuccessful as a Trader, that I'd still be coming here more than a decade later showing you patterns that work AND a pattern that you have NEVER seen before this thread was commenced? Wake up, naysayers.

I was in this thing before there was a ForexFactory.com. I was a Charter Member of this board - meaning one of the very first to post here - before some of you had even graduated either High School or College. I was Trading 2 Win before they even knew the name over in the UK. I've had telephone conversations many years ago with Niv, over at FXCM - long before FXCM blossomed and long before Jason Rogers, came to work for FXCM. That was back when Niv, would take a phone call. He's changed a lot since those days. I go back to before WizeTrade launched itself and began its world wind seminar days selling trend following algorithms to total Nubes. I go back to the days of Spread Trading Options and I was there doing it long before Options Express got started and before George Fontanills (rest his soul) began selling courses via VHS (remember VHS?). I learned a lot from George and I am grateful that he was around doing his thing when I was green and dumb as a Trader.

I am not new to this game.

I was with Brown & Company, are you kidding me. This was back when Brown & Company were running cartoon-like commercials and allegedly declining accounts for "traders who were not serious enough," which was code for not having a large enough initial deposit. Brown & Company, would not hold your hand back then - you sank or your swam and they literally did not give a damn whether you did or not.

Some of you guys have it too easy these days - you are SPOILED. You have no CLUE about what it was like back in those days. I came from an era where you had to work your ass off to learn something of value and I took that reality very seriously, because I wanted to be a successful Trader in my own right and there was nobody hanging around online giving me trading ideas on a silver platter. I had to create those ideas from nothing but a blank spreadsheet and raw data.

Brown & Company, as a brand "new trader" - are you serious calling me a troll? Back then, they would have told all of you nickle and dime Naysayers to go away. So, don't talk to me about "trolling." I know a troll when I see one. I also know a successful Trader when I see one, too.

Either use the information or don't. It really is just that simple.

Whose support? Whose resistance? Can you identify who is putting up a front at support and resistance just to lure you into a trap? Keeping your lot sizes small will guarantee that you keep your profits de-optimized, if you have not accounted for the Magnitude of the event you are scaling into. (a big mistake rookie traders and overly cautious trader make all the time). You trade with FEAR, while I trade with confidence. There is a distinct disadvantage to that and you had better figure out - quick.

How do you know that support is NOT about to become resistance and Market Phase 1 or 5 is about to commence, leaving you with nothing but a pyramid scheme as the only reason why you don't go broke much sooner?

You need to learn more about what you are doing - you read like a total amateur. How many times have you identified Resistance becoming Support, and Support becoming Resistance before it was too late to do anything about it? Again, whose support and whose resistance? Which dimension do these price levels belong to and in which dimensions are these levels reversing polarity? If you don't understand that, then you don't understand Support and Resistance as well as you think you do.

Empirically evaluated patterns that are then statistically modeled in the data and then filtered for high density probability relative to the location of price at some future time, is superior to any other method of trading I have observed - for the sole purpose of predicting the location of price over time.

touché

Thanks for chiming in again

Welcome back iDoubleStoch!

Thank you for this quote! =) This is all that I had been doing for years, thanks to your work. Science and statistics is science and statistics, nothing more.

If other people do not know how to do the modelling themselves, its really their problem. I can understand why you would provide limited releases of your work to the public, while knowing that wimps who would not do his/her homework do not deserve more.

Good! these arrogant asses needed to get their heads handed to them from the right person (s).........

Back to relevant matters, I posted a pic earlier in this thread of an observation I had which is marked with a horizontal line in white.

I was wondering thou; should I just post a good part of my statistical work just to 'prove' that there are consistent and specific levels, where price will stop/struggle? Which implies support and resistance can be projected ahead of time using past price structure? And these structures are at least 80% reliable?

People want evidence, it also takes effort to produce evidence. I actually have the evidence on hand, but for personal consumption (years of hard work you know =d) I had my hands itchy and head pondering upon it for days; I would love to share part of my work, to both simulate thought but to also continue to find flaws and improve my work with the help of 'peer reviews'.

Now, I am not so sure, given the current audience. Seems to me that the audience in ForexFactory is more hostile (Sorry! I am just stating my experiences here. For whatever reason, I don't know why this is the case) compared to Babypips. I used to open up my work back in a thread in Babypips. I abandoned the thread and cleaned up the posts because I was 'getting too close to the truth'. Perhaps I should keep it closed up and private (again) if things do not go well.

Why is it so hard to have a calm and civil discussion? Or, I would only allow it for a limited, carefully selected audience, after posting a 'teaser', if I may

*ends rant (sorta)*

I remember you!! I visited that thread on babypips for a while.

Anything you would like to share will be appreciated by the serious learner, but as you clearly pointed out, there are some here who go around trying to derail any idea they did not come up with and demean any new idea. So, still your choice to share or not but I myself would like to see what you envision with the concept presented in this thread regardless if you share your private collection or not.