understand my explorer before you consider it!
Attached Image
Similarity: A Practical Approach 859 replies
Similarity Trading - The ZZBB Method 215 replies
Rainbow similarity 256 replies
Similarity Stuff 17 replies
Directional Similarity 0 replies
DislikedAn up will come within this period but don't trade against this high probability setup generally.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hello eurusdd, are you still looking for correction to 1.3334 today? Can you give high probability if the first level to be breached is going to be 1.3334 or 1.3387?Ignored
DislikedYes, I look towards the low, but you say that there COULD be a rally first, right? Do you see something to be corrected around 1.3387 area and do you have probability which comes first for the price ?Ignored
Disliked{quote} oh ok. I don't see 1.3387 before correction. Probability is low. it may happen but I don't bet on low probabilities!!! That is why I always make sure my loss is very small even if i do not use stop loss. Look at the open buy is my explorer. It is a loss right now but small compare to my profit!!! It was a buy to hedge a sell. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Nice, you were right about the unsustainable uptrend! I bet you are selling the correction on your real accounts as well. So your 1.3386 buy was only a protect trade? Too bad as I thought I was seeing a dissimilarity on 1.3387, based on the concept and also ralome indicator gave a fresh zone there.Ignored
DislikedThe problem for me still remains as to chose which price to trade first between 2 different levels. As they are above and also below the current price, I always have the dilemma and often take too much damage and floating loss on the trades..... It seems your have reall strong evidence to know the specific order of corrections.Ignored
Disliked{quote} I told you guys on friday, "the UP is not sustainable" but almost everyone ignored it because of 1.3390. Well, now they will believe. This correction has NEVER failed before, 345 in total on 4hr and higher time frames. So, based on history, CORRECTION IS THE WAY TO GO!!!!Ignored
Disliked{quote} If you could hedge, I will say "buy and sell right now". If not, the american session is yet to open; so down is better deal!!!Ignored
Disliked{quote} eurusdd, I must admit I think you made a wise decision to move your responses to this place, instead of the eur/usd topic. That and any apologies from earlier responses aside, I am wondering if you could answer two questions because right now I am working on elements that I wish to implement in a strategy I am already using. 1* I noticed that 4 digit and 5 digit brokers give different outcomes on some occasions when it comes to plotting the omega's. (despite using the exact same values and tf's). Could you shed some light on this matter?...Ignored
Disliked{quote} oh ok. I don't see 1.3387 before correction. Probability is low. it may happen but I don't bet on low probabilities!!! That is why I always make sure my loss is very small even if i do not use stop loss. Look at the open buy is my explorer. It is a loss right now but small compare to my profit!!! It was a buy to hedge a sell. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote}gOOD: First I want you to know that what those guys are saying on the EURUSD thread is wrong. The algorithm we are using is not semaphor. It is true that on higher time frames semaphor agrees with our algorithm about 67% of the time, But rest assured, you will lose with semaphor!!! i STATED the reasons on that thread. Maybe you can find a way to adapt to semaphor but it is not the deal.!!!! Now: concerning the way problems are corrected. Once a problem is created, the difference between semaphor and our algorithm is this: there is only one...Ignored