interesting - I ever thought he would be more kind of fat kat or like this:
Attached Image
Disliked{quote} Edited. Story in short: The bugger got greeted by his cheerleaders and made the crowds sell at 7045-7049, then pulled the same tricks as last year ("hold, until I tell you otherwise"). Then disapeeared and re-surfaced when everyone is in deep drawdown to tell them to widen their stops to 300 pips, because he holds his trade and absolutely nothing has changed... except the drawdown, but that's counting beans, isn't it? Well, off again... I can't take that shit for any extended period of time any more.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Have already reduced the Gold holdings of my father a bit, will reduce completely towards the 1360 level. Will load again much deeper. We never ever hold Gold in a bank.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Cool, make sure also that you dont miss shorts once we go close to 1360, should be heavy trade on down side.Ignored
Disliked{quote} http://www.forexfactory.com/showthre...60#post7596060 And people keep on praising him.........Ignored
Disliked{quote} Wait, until the E/U touches 3080 btw... that turkish janitor is getting on my nerves. never mind...Ignored
Disliked{quote} maybe about time to deescalate, I mean both sides.........Ignored
DislikedSome conclusive moves of bears to test more lower on GJ possibly. http://prntscr.com/41jbm7Ignored
DislikedA simple question, I am pretty new to EW and still reading a lot. But something came up to my mind and irritates me completely: Although it seems pretty subjective to the EW counter which peaks he/she counts or not I find it really impressive why there has not been a consensus about an uptodate counting sequence at least on a single TF (if for more it is too complicated) which is accepted by everyone to be valid (so that no one is forced to repeat the counting from the stoneage). I mean the whole theory has rules, so after such a long time using...Ignored