The Club! | Page 768 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Help Me Establish The GbpUsd After Dinner Club 40 replies

Attachments: The Club!
Exit Attachments

The Club!

  • #15,341
  • Jul 10, 2014 11:44am Jul 10, 2014 11:44am
Quoting bzzz
{quote} murky by night {image}

interesting - I ever thought he would be more kind of fat kat or like this:

Attached Image
  • #15,342
  • Jul 10, 2014 11:52am Jul 10, 2014 11:52am
Quoting infinitus
EU EW 4h TF so far this is the count I am going with {image}

how nice the channel held

actual:

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Chart_EUR_USD_2 Hours_snapshot.png Size: 44 KB
  • #15,343
  • Jul 10, 2014 12:17pm Jul 10, 2014 12:17pm
one can only wonder

people seem to be prone to ponzi schemes

http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/defau.../picture-5.jpg
Pure Madness: Revenueless, Assetless CYNK Soars Over $5Bn; Bigger Than GameStop, Cablevision, Jabil Circuit
  • #15,344
  • Jul 10, 2014 12:22pm Jul 10, 2014 12:22pm
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/defau.../picture-5.jpg
US Responds To China "Global Disaster" Threat By Boosting Military Presence In China's Back Yard


What is that???? Stupidity? Addiction for omnipotence? How many fronts can one country build until it collapses?
  • #15,345
  • Jul 10, 2014 12:29pm Jul 10, 2014 12:29pm
Horvat

http://www.fxstreet.com/analysis/ell...er/2014/07/10/
  • #15,346
  • Jul 10, 2014 12:54pm Jul 10, 2014 12:54pm
Quoting Mr Hatch
{quote} Edited. Story in short: The bugger got greeted by his cheerleaders and made the crowds sell at 7045-7049, then pulled the same tricks as last year ("hold, until I tell you otherwise"). Then disapeeared and re-surfaced when everyone is in deep drawdown to tell them to widen their stops to 300 pips, because he holds his trade and absolutely nothing has changed... except the drawdown, but that's counting beans, isn't it? Well, off again... I can't take that shit for any extended period of time any more.

http://www.forexfactory.com/showthre...60#post7596060

And people keep on praising him.........
  • #15,347
  • Jul 10, 2014 2:19pm Jul 10, 2014 2:19pm
Quoting infinitus
{quote} Have already reduced the Gold holdings of my father a bit, will reduce completely towards the 1360 level. Will load again much deeper. We never ever hold Gold in a bank.
Cool, make sure also that you dont miss shorts once we go close to 1360, should be heavy trade on down side.
  • #15,348
  • Jul 10, 2014 2:36pm Jul 10, 2014 2:36pm
Quoting janpec1000
{quote} Cool, make sure also that you dont miss shorts once we go close to 1360, should be heavy trade on down side.

exactly, that is the plan
  • #15,349
  • Jul 10, 2014 2:56pm Jul 10, 2014 2:56pm
Quoting infinitus
{quote} http://www.forexfactory.com/showthre...60#post7596060 And people keep on praising him.........
Wait, until the E/U touches 3080

btw... that turkish janitor is getting on my nerves. never mind...
  • #15,350
  • Jul 10, 2014 3:01pm Jul 10, 2014 3:01pm
Quoting Mr Hatch
{quote} Wait, until the E/U touches 3080 btw... that turkish janitor is getting on my nerves. never mind...



maybe about time to deescalate, I mean both sides.........
  • #15,351
  • Jul 10, 2014 3:36pm Jul 10, 2014 3:36pm
Quoting infinitus
{quote} exactly, that is the plan
I am short from 1343 level, one small one. Love reading the thread, always helpful. Keep it up, cheers!
  • #15,352
  • Jul 10, 2014 4:11pm Jul 10, 2014 4:11pm
Quoting infinitus
{quote} maybe about time to deescalate, I mean both sides.........
do not bother to waste your time. dem tischtuch ist zerschnitten.
  • #15,353
  • Jul 11, 2014 3:34am Jul 11, 2014 3:34am
Some conclusive moves of bears to test more lower on GJ possibly.
http://prntscr.com/41jbm7
  • #15,354
  • Jul 11, 2014 4:29am Jul 11, 2014 4:29am
Weather warfare, HAARP proof and chemtrails insider:
Inserted Video

Inserted Video


There is one interesting thing that really backs up most of conspirancy theories on Youtube, as Google one of main Bilderberg group/NSA companies is hammering down actively views of all videos of conspirancy theories on Youtube that are just too hard to not be true due to visual or presented evidence. If you check many of them get views hammered down once they reach 1 milion, down to aprox 300k-800k range, so that every time they pass 1mil they get hammered down, to keep them in shadows and staying out of main Youtube page.
  • #15,355
  • Jul 11, 2014 8:16am Jul 11, 2014 8:16am
Quoting janpec1000
Some conclusive moves of bears to test more lower on GJ possibly. http://prntscr.com/41jbm7
Done droped nicely, no more shorts as this demand zone is quite large. If we get to 172.5 then long most likely.
  • #15,356
  • Jul 11, 2014 11:00am Jul 11, 2014 11:00am
another one bites the dust


or in this case: one came to his senses and left the cage of fools


http://www.forexfactory.com/showthre...56#post7598656

http://www.forexfactory.com/showthre...12#post7599112 (one of many)


Gigi, good work here

we can conclude:

a) Murky is not willing to share the core (of strategy)

b) Murky is not able to share the core, because the values for his spreadsheet (at least some of them) he got delivered, as take it or leave it, without knowing the algorithm behind


Why can I conclude b)?

Easy:

a) he is to stupid for algorithm

b) when you have followed him long enough you would have mentioned some habits that would lead to the conclusion (maybe I work out on this part when I am bored the next days)
  • #15,357
  • Jul 12, 2014 4:10am Jul 12, 2014 4:10am
Quoting infinitus
{quote} how nice the channel held actual: {image}
at the start...
targets in the stratosphere )
Attached Image
  • #15,358
  • Jul 12, 2014 5:40am Jul 12, 2014 5:40am
Quoting Grigoriy
{quote} at the start... targets in the stratosphere ) {image}
Yes possible, thats one of reasons why i am staying EU bearish.
  • #15,359
  • Jul 12, 2014 6:56am Jul 12, 2014 6:56am
A simple question,

I am pretty new to EW and still reading a lot.

But something came up to my mind and irritates me completely:

Although it seems pretty subjective to the EW counter which peaks he/she counts or not I find it really impressive why there has not been a consensus about an uptodate counting sequence at least on a single TF (if for more it is too complicated) which is accepted by everyone to be valid (so that no one is forced to repeat the counting from the stoneage).

I mean the whole theory has rules, so after such a long time using it it should be pretty easy for the EW users to come to some accordance how these waves should have been counted correctly at least for the past.

A good written computer program with the coded rules should do the counting in no time. Does nothing like this exist?

And if this canīt be done, isnīt it so that the whole theory does not work?

Is my thinking too naive? Are there problems that I am not able to see?
  • #15,360
  • Jul 12, 2014 8:44am Jul 12, 2014 8:44am
Quoting CandleStar
A simple question, I am pretty new to EW and still reading a lot. But something came up to my mind and irritates me completely: Although it seems pretty subjective to the EW counter which peaks he/she counts or not I find it really impressive why there has not been a consensus about an uptodate counting sequence at least on a single TF (if for more it is too complicated) which is accepted by everyone to be valid (so that no one is forced to repeat the counting from the stoneage). I mean the whole theory has rules, so after such a long time using...
No it cant be done becouse EW theory tries to predict future on simple single TF counting facts, if you want to have proper direction you need to update it it per high and low and you need to have it inter-TF to do so. Only supply and demand counting can provide that, and EW theory does not count that in properly as many times supply and demand zones are not fully triggered by highs and lows that EW theory counts. With that said, this is the factor why i do not follow EW future coutning and rather focous on what market tells right now, where sup-dem analysis focous on bounces not breaks and future bounces that might or might not happen and are completly based on possible lower TF bounces and not actual price development of lower TFs. EW counts are decent aproximation for expecations but i would never base TPs or SLs on them, becouse only sup-dem development trough TFs is what i follow and its much more constructive and real where bounces actually come from. This means that sup-dem analysis does not count in breaks of highs and lows in analysis only bounces, breaks are very subjective to predict.
10 traders viewing now