Disliked{quote} Bulleyes, Some thoughts for you. Its on charts. No need further explanation.. {image} {image} {image}Ignored
1
Price Will Tell - Supply/Demand Price Action Trading 1,856 replies
Readthemarket (Ifmyante) - Is it legit stuff or not? 18 replies
Price Action + Demand & Supply Zone + Money Management 0 replies
Price movement as a function of Supply and Demand 43 replies
Suppy, Demand and Price Action 28 replies
Disliked{quote} Bulleyes, Some thoughts for you. Its on charts. No need further explanation.. {image} {image} {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} If you can upload an image, or describe exactly what you want to display, I'll adapt the indi' that I have and upload it for you and anyone else to use.Ignored
DislikedThis is what we said a diamond can happen after an engulfing!? If so we can expect the price action as below. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} I'm not a RTM expert as i'm still learning ....i try to see the market as decision points on value and eliminate bias from my thinking.....so in that case...a level holds until it's broken(i know it sounds a little funny ) but untilll that level we reacted to hasn't been engulfed...that is the first trouble area where we should decide weather to keep the trade, close the trade ....or if we get the signal we could enter another trade back up. Also those two supply's are formed as a reaction to the other one...therefore staked supply->usually...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Yep, I tend to look at it the same, but not always correctly! The stacked zones bring me back to my Sam Seiden days. But what intrigues me most is the stuff he left out that RTM covers.... the flag limits, engulfing, etc.Ignored
DislikedYogi Bro, thanks for your help! I'm trying to digest now. I understand for important engulfs, FL is FTR. Therefore the FL is not a line as I thought (edge of a flag), it is an area defined by the FTR zigzag. But a Flag between upper FL and lower FL does touch both FLs, doesn't it? As to your yesterday trade of usdcad, i have tons of questions. I've followed your posts carefully, since late Apr, early May, you started posting more charts with boxes. They appeared like PAZ defined by FL to me, but not confirmed if I remember right. I attached a chart...Ignored
DislikedYogi Bro, I've spent a while to put my read & doubts on the attached chart, please comment. your three boxes look delicate, but i have doubts like 'why didn't he draw it that way but this way?', i put my guess of what these 3 boxes are in red fonts, hoping you can enlighten me. I felt lots of 'unsure' when drawing it, lol. I must have left out something, but it should be due to ignorance instead of laziness. {quote} {image}Ignored
Dislikedlove this quote, lol, i often didn't feel it when entering, and felt it later {quote}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Charvo, You need to look more to the left. High or Low reaction to a FL , then you need to take the FL once that engulfed. {image} PM me if you have any doubts.Ignored
Disliked{quote} It's actually a widespread misconception. At the moment the deal is executed, both sides are in a win-win situation or the deal would not have been possible. However. since time passes, and future becomes past, we have those who were right and those who were wrong. Oh, and both parties can still earn. I can buy from those fixing profits and sell higher to fix mine.Ignored
Disliked{quote} It's actually a widespread misconception. At the moment the deal is executed, both sides are in a win-win situation or the deal would not have been possible. However. since time passes, and future becomes past, we have those who were right and those who were wrong. Oh, and both parties can still earn. I can buy from those fixing profits and sell higher to fix mine.Ignored
Disliked{quote} ok you are right.....then who is losing the money we would like to make?Ignored
Disliked{quote} ok you are right.....then who is losing the money we would like to make?Ignored
Disliked{quote} Do you mean red boxes that you are looking at as decisions.?Ignored