Disliked{quote} the utmost key is consistency. if you can average 10 pips a day you can easily be wealthyIgnored
"Ratios & Harmonics: a Different Way to Trade." Summary 37 replies
Learning to trade with harmonics 11 replies
Time for Change - Pivots & Harmonics to freedom 67 replies
180 reasons to trade Harmonics and Patterns 13 replies
Disliked{quote} I don't go for 10 pips and get out and stop for the day, that's foolish. I go for as many as possible lol. Average 10 including all wins and losses. as far as stops are concerned I just get out at market when I believe I am wrong I have no set stop losses. I have a whole journal of my trades "Fine4x Trade Journal" check it out. anyone here can post on itIgnored
Disliked{quote} thats dangerous if you got no set stops what if the market move fast you got time to stop it just like what happen this morning on eurusdIgnored
Disliked{quote} this morning I was long gbpusd and short eurusd when news came out. neither market made a definitive move until 1-3 minutes after news. I maintained both positions because news usually goes in my favor. euro I ended up losing pips (18) and I got out when I knew I was for sure wrong I had plenty of chances. the pips I made being long gbp (18) made up for those lost pips which was nice and still got out early.Ignored
Disliked{quote} This is how you say, a good analysis is invalidated by the news, best be off the market. Thanks again for your input and knowledge. regardsIgnored
Disliked{quote} if one doesn't have a solid grasp of where price is going then you are gambling. It is my belief that news is just a period of volatility and commonly follows the intentions of the market (structure & orderflow). That being said there is no system that's 100% right there are always exceptionsIgnored
DislikedAny view or comment to animals living on different supply/demand levels? AudUsd after the AU news, pick an animal and the right level, or at least one of those. What do you think? {image}
Ignored
Disliked{quote} if one doesn't have a solid grasp of where price is going then you are gambling. It is my belief that news is just a period of volatility and commonly follows the intentions of the market (structure & orderflow). That being said there is no system that's 100% right there are always exceptionsIgnored
Disliked{quote} if one doesn't have a solid grasp of where price is going then you are gambling. It is my belief that news is just a period of volatility and commonly follows the intentions of the market (structure & orderflow). That being said there is no system that's 100% right there are always exceptionsIgnored
Disliked{quote} Oh boy, I really like the site no reaction to most of the things posted!! Why you guys including myself do not just post on your home file system, would be as effective as this, but of course without a mirror, without the reflection . Do you need a spoon, or feeding, or ultimately spoon feeding? I post here to get improvement suggestions, and critique to improve...I do not get it.. What is your purpose of posting here? Hmm...dunno...results would show.Ignored
DislikedMomentum for bullish side gets weaker, depth gets deeper. For my analysis, price should go down, time will tell this.{image}
Ignored
DislikedI think we are all going around in circles about news being a period of volatility... nobody is disagreeing with that, and any number of chart examples will show that. So perhaps I should rephrase my point: why are stops wide enough to tolerate the volatility of news spikes? Is there an objective reason, or is it subjective choice? Can we define the point where we say "enough is enough, this trade is going against me"? If so, where is it? I still maintain that on the short time frames (M5, 233 tick) the spikes generated by high impact news are enough...Ignored
DislikedI think we are all going around in circles about news being a period of volatility... nobody is disagreeing with that, and any number of chart examples will show that. So perhaps I should rephrase my point: why are stops wide enough to tolerate the volatility of news spikes? Is there an objective reason, or is it subjective choice? Can we define the point where we say "enough is enough, this trade is going against me"? If so, where is it? I still maintain that on the short time frames (M5, 233 tick) the spikes generated by high impact news are enough...Ignored