DislikedHello, Do you know how to make the M15 data on GBPUSD longer? I can only test from 14/6/2013 until now. I need more datas to have a reliable track record. Over 2 years is PERFECT !Ignored
Lets make some green pips
10 Ema and 200 Ema cross system 6 replies
Simple, pure mechanical H4-System, EA needed 70 replies
A very simple EMA/CCI system 15 replies
Disliked{quote} Go to.... Tools -> History centre -> ...download any data that you wantIgnored
Disliked{quote} I think what he meant was..winning BIG on 50% of his total trades but making small loss on the other 50%Ignored
DislikedIf you want to compare R and R', they must be based on same number of trades. 50% remain 50% in any case with 1:1. You will always be BE - spread ... in the long run.Ignored
Disliked{quote} I know you are a coder . So you are better in maths than me. But if you want to prove something true. You need Evidence, even Maths. Just show me why? My strategy doesn't have a WR = 50%, it's nearly 50%. So, just prove me, why?Ignored
Disliked{quote} R:R=1:1 (Win rate)= 40% , total 30 trades => 12 trades win R':R'=1:1 (Win rate)=60% , total 30 trades => 18 trades win => Total winning rate = ( 12 + 18 )/ (30+30) = 30/60 = 50%Ignored
Disliked{quote} So what's wrong with that? I mean that in some strategy, although the total winning rate is 50%, but the winning rate with the trades where the risk is large is superior than the winning rate with the trades where the risk is small. That's why right now the strategy is temporary profitable. That's why I need a robot to check this will happen in the long run or not?Ignored
Dislikedvothien - you're wasting your time arguing with the haters on this thread, and you're not getting any closer to your goal. I suggest you download Forex Strategy Builder from http://forexsb.com/ (it's free), which will allow you to easily and quickly backtest this strategy, no coding required. Plus it will also be able to trade the strategy for you going forward.Ignored
Disliked{quote} What is the point backtesting a strategy which is mathematically wrong? 1+1=2. Believe it or not. Like it or not. Accept it or not. 1+1=2, for you, for me, for everybody. It has always been, it will always be.Ignored
DislikedIs it negativism to say "Hey guy watch out there is a wall just ahead". Do you prefer I let him believe he will walk throught the bricks? A edgeless system will not produce long term profits. Not for me, not for you, not for him, not for anybody. FF is driven by whim and wishful thinking. People prefer dreaming and believing rather than thinking and facing the facts.Ignored