Disliked{quote} Hi Eurusdd, Was this the post you were referring too? I found it in the other thread: {quote} Regards NeioIgnored
- #3,642
- Jul 21, 2013 8:40am Jul 21, 2013 8:40am
- Joined Jul 2009 | Status: symbol | 1,549 Posts
Thanks Eurusdd, I knew you had mentioned it, just couldn't find it. I will it set up later on, hanging wallpaper now. I have a feeling this wallpaper will go up to 8" 6' before it drops to the floor, there's a wormhole there, no actually it's a woodworm hole, my mistake 
cu later.
cu later.
Keep smiling
- #3,644
- Jul 21, 2013 9:08am Jul 21, 2013 9:08am
- Joined Jul 2009 | Status: symbol | 1,549 Posts
Keep smiling
- #3,646
- Jul 21, 2013 9:37am Jul 21, 2013 9:37am
- | Membership Revoked | Joined Oct 2012 | 2,254 Posts
{quote} Hi Eurusdd, Could you please explain more about this ? Thank U.
In the case of the EURUSD you can say that 1.32038 is an isolated point that causes lack of similarity on high timeframes. Price has to flow there in order to correct the problem. So - in the mean time :BULLISH is the way.
Don't worry about all the background calculations: just watch the number and plan your trades carefully. If your signals are telling you to sell, seriously- remember "you were WARNED"!!!
On 2nd July, 2013 I gave a hint about EURUSD: I am sure she took a lot of people by surprise when she jumped above 1.3200.
- #3,651
- Jul 21, 2013 9:53am Jul 21, 2013 9:53am
Im sorry, I did not mean to offend anyone!
The document is helpful for me. Just wanted to share if anyone also could find it useful.
I can remove it if you want.
I did not mean "noise" in the way that many posts aren´t worth reading. Believe me I have read most of the posts in this thread.
My intention was to more easily being able to look up many of the posts explaining or discussing the strategy!!
The document is helpful for me. Just wanted to share if anyone also could find it useful.
I can remove it if you want.
I did not mean "noise" in the way that many posts aren´t worth reading. Believe me I have read most of the posts in this thread.
My intention was to more easily being able to look up many of the posts explaining or discussing the strategy!!
- #3,652
- Edited 10:27am Jul 21, 2013 9:53am | Edited 10:27am
- | Additional Username | Joined May 2013 | 724 Posts
Good day friends! I needed to try to filter out much of the "noise" in this thread and get some sort of overview of everything. So I have made some sort of summary that helps me look up and re-read stuff more easily! Don't know if anyone´s interested but I thought I could share it with you as it might be helpful for you to! I will update this continuously and feel free to PM me if you would like something added to the list! {image}
and if you think Eurusdd is offended you read him wrong. Yes, the information presented is not as straight forward as what we might be used to because this it FORCES YOU TO THINK. If you seek to understand this stuff you need to read stuff over and over in order to do so and that gives you reinforcement. As you ponder over stuff it also FORCES YOU TO EXPERIMENT. This whole thing is centered not just on similarity it also about changing PERSPECTIVE, seeing things in a different light. Once you get that first break thru...the rest will follow naturally although for dumb shits like me they follow much slower
. Unless you are exceptionally talented like some here......this is likely the best way to teach you this stuff because you will not be just be remembering stuff...you will be UNDERSTANDING stuff. That is what he is trying to give!! Read my own summary....after ALL the help I've gotten here all I had to give back was just a one page summary that not is very "clear cut" either!!! Selfish bugger right?? But why did I do that?? Because if I came up with something like you...did I would be doing the opposite of what Eurusdd is trying to do!!!But do not get me wrong also..your work is commendable and for people who have already been putting in the hours and acheived certain levels of understanding already.....it is extremely useful if we need to go back in time for some fact checking or reference and what not. And it does not affect us negatively because we are already commited to making ourself think and understand. But for thoes who are new or have yet to find that first ah hah moment you have UNITENTIONALLY robbed them of a chance to acheive a proficient understanding of the subject matter. You see the light my friend?
Prehaps this file you made can be shared on a request basic instead??
I want more brain power!
- #3,654
- Jul 21, 2013 10:00am Jul 21, 2013 10:00am
- | Membership Revoked | Joined Oct 2012 | 2,254 Posts
- #3,655
- Jul 21, 2013 10:11am Jul 21, 2013 10:11am
- | Membership Revoked | Joined Oct 2012 | 2,254 Posts
- #3,656
- Jul 21, 2013 10:13am Jul 21, 2013 10:13am
{quote} A price-process like that for EURUSDD has to satisfy certain fractal-similarity properties across time-frames. It does not matter how "random" or "pseudo-random" the process is. In the case of the EURUSD you can say that 1.32038 is an isolated point that causes lack of similarity on high timeframes. Price has to flow there in order to correct the problem. So - in the mean time :BULLISH is the way. Don't worry about all the background calculations: just watch the number and plan your trades carefully. If your signals are telling you to...
- #3,657
- Jul 21, 2013 10:19am Jul 21, 2013 10:19am
- | Membership Revoked | Joined Oct 2012 | 2,254 Posts
{quote} Thank U very much Eurusdd ...
- #3,658
- Jul 21, 2013 10:22am Jul 21, 2013 10:22am
- | Membership Revoked | Joined Oct 2012 | 2,254 Posts
- #3,659
- Jul 21, 2013 10:23am Jul 21, 2013 10:23am
THE SIMILARITY PRINCIPLE!!! Let X(n) be a random/pseudo-random process that satisfies - certain well-defined conditions (known as the fractal-conditions). Let F and G be functions that satisfy the Black-conditions and agree almost surely on the set {X(n)| n>0}. Then the set of values on which F and G do not agree is a predictor of the process. One has to construct F and G, continuously as the process evolves or use the back-door approach to extend F and G. This is the hardest part!!! If you can construct good candidates for F & G, then you are close!!!...
- #3,660
- Jul 21, 2013 10:25am Jul 21, 2013 10:25am
I DID not give you a precise way to apply the principle - . I only introduced the idea in the crudest way possible. It is up to you to see the little light......
