Everyone has gone silent, let's post some charts of our trades.
something like 600 pips for two days
- #3,082
- Jul 18, 2013 2:50pm Jul 18, 2013 2:50pm
{quote} almost perfect for two days, had to close few trades with small minus, have to sleep too, sometimes something like 600 pips for two days {image}
Have you traded using Stoch/BB/ZZ method only?!
At M15?
I would love to read some kind of summary/explanation of how you trade your entries and exits.
Im sure there will be many hints from you earlier in the thread, but its really hard to follow everybody at the same time!
- #3,084
- Jul 18, 2013 2:55pm Jul 18, 2013 2:55pm
Ok, let see if I've got this right. If my math is correct, current disimilarity will end at 1:45 AM GMT. By the way... this is all based on the current indicators. Eurusdd did mention there were not perfect. Yet, if I've got my math right, it should end there. Give a +/- 1 candle as I am currently calculating manually and I could have made a mistake
Please pull my head out of my ass, I am running out of oxygen...
- #3,088
- Jul 18, 2013 3:08pm Jul 18, 2013 3:08pm
- Joined Feb 2009 | Status: Trader | 2,293 Posts
{quote} Really impressive!
maybe 25 pairs or something like that
good night
- #3,089
- Jul 18, 2013 3:10pm Jul 18, 2013 3:10pm
dissimilarity could appear sooner if price happens to tick over 1.31771 or under 1.30486. I just effing wish I effing knew how to use this to make some effing money.... lol
{quote} EXCELLENT POST!Same thing I am looking for. We need trading rules. That's it. ABC will result in trading rules. They may not always be RIGHT but they are rules that can be tested.
A : Identifying which target price will go for.
I quote post #1581, #1674, #1816, #1817, #1818 and have found no direct answer from them but a good general direction of how to think.
Post #2784 sheds a little more light on the thought process but I've yet to fully absorb it
Post #3066 leads me to this suggestion that one should not be lazy and just look at the indicator, we need to mark that unborn zone out the moment we get it because i think it affects which target price will choose.
In other words the game play changes every time a new DS appear. It changes the moment the DS appears and NOT when it finally paints. Eurusdd had a case study referred to in post #3066 sorry I can't find post number for that but this how I will pharse my thoughts :
1) Start with the zone that is currently painting as price is moving.Keeping in mind that price is currently in a state of similarity thats why the zone is painting.
2) As price moves along inevitably the state of similarity will end and DS will start again. Mark out where the new zone is due to appear.
3) Price cannot move in such a way that will cause the currently painting zone to meet the unborn zone. It will cause chaos and the world will explode! It has to move in a direction that is away from the "unborn" zone
4) So in order for the world to not explode..if the currently painting zone is above the "unborn" zone price must go up thus targeting the zones above. If the currently painting zone is below the "unborn" zone price must go down.
I cannot check on my theory as I do not have MT4 now but if I do this how I can check it based on.....
Eurusdd asked us to think where price would be when an "unborn" zone paints. Our best answer so far is based on how price action breaks the close of the DS candle that caused the DS. If it breaks up then PA will be above the zone when it paints if it breaks below PA will be below. Correlate this with what I mentioned in (4). If by some miracle I am right then we will be able to a certain degree not only be able to a)pick probable targets but also b) know that any break of the DS candle in the wrong direction is false PA cannot be reasonably substained.
Sorry for the ramblings
I want more brain power!
