I can't read your ratios properly but I THINK that's not a Gartley ( the AB retracement never made it to the 61.8 of XA main swing). it looks more to me as if it is an ABCD with the BC taking a long time to form?
I can't read your ratios properly but I THINK that's not a Gartley ( the AB retracement never made it to the 61.8 of XA main swing). it looks more to me as if it is an ABCD with the BC taking a long time to form?
Ignored
you're right, I'm confusing with some other monster, what is it?
I put the same weight on all PRZ no matter the timeframe. You have to know what you are trading and what is reasonable expectancy on the timeframe you are trading. If the pattern is high timeframe that's fine just know that there will be significantly more swings and corrections between entry and target. But that does not change the strength of the signal. Because you are already on a smaller timeframe will help you identify a better entry and a more precise SL placement. If you are at the computer always take the time to review price action in...
i am one of the newbies here. i really enjoy the interaction and willingness to educate. I have a book by Larry Pesavento and i should admit that 99% of what is in the book never really made sense in real trading. thanks to YOU Mr. Pip, i have a better understanding even if it is still only a seed.
anyhow, i was wondering if anyone has comments about AUD/USD?
choose a job you love and you will never have to work a day in your life
i am one of the newbies here. i really enjoy the interaction and willingness to educate. I have a book by Larry Pesavento and i should admit that 99% of what is in the book never really made sense in real trading. thanks to YOU Mr. Pip, i have a better understanding even if it is still only a seed.
anyhow, i was wondering if anyone has comments about AUD/USD?
Ignored
I believe AUD/USD created a gartley on the 1 minute, but its a lil messy because the 127 extension didnt match up with the 786 retracement of XA but it did bounce off the 786 maybe i measured wrong. still learning especially on the 1min
I believe AUD/USD created a gartley on the 1 minute, but its a lil messy because the 127 extension didnt match up with the 786 retracement of XA but it did bounce off the 786 maybe i measured wrong. still learning especially on the 1min
Ignored
I was watching A/U M5 for an aggressive C but did not close in the zone.
The A/U gartley has the ABCD PRZ not confluent with the 78-88 fibs
If you're still asking if that is a valid gartley the answer is NO it does not according to Mr Pips rules. He has optimized the pattern rules for the highest probability trades. Does it qualify for a generic gartley, probable.
If you're still asking if that is a valid gartley the answer is NO it does not according to Mr Pips rules. He has optimized the pattern rules for the highest probability trades. Does it qualify for a generic gartley, probable.
Ignored
I understand, I'm sorry, unfortunately I do not understand English and I'm in confusion
Ratios & Harmonics: a Different Way to Trade
