A better Editor for mql is available. 100x better than MetaEditor 20 replies
Broker needs to do better, much better 4 replies
Better momentum and better Sine wave indicator 0 replies
Mathematical reasons why MOST DayTraders & scalpers fail? 197 replies
Is Better still better? 1 reply
DislikedHi Matt,
I had this marked on my chart too, what was / is your target? 143.69?Ignored
DislikedI was targeting the few bar highs and lows at 143.50.
Which means that I called it pretty much perfectly!
But (and yes, there had to be a "but") I didn't catch this move because I cancelled the order when it came within 1 point of my order, then bounced northwards three quarters of the way to my target. I figured I had missed the move. I didn't expect it to come back to my level two hours later, and then bounce straight back up to my target.
But there you go. You can't catch them all. Although I was gutted I missed it, I would do...Ignored
Dislikedits like good setup christmas out there today! too bad I didn't get home until 7:00 est. I did catch CAD at 1.0055 thoughIgnored
DislikedFor the second time in 24 hours, I have missed a beautiful trade by a pip or two.
I had my order to buy USD/CAD at 1.0053.
The positive part of my brain keeps telling me that is shows that I am now identifying great setups, it's just bad luck to have missed both this and the Bund trade this week.
The other part of my brain just wants to shout lots of swear words.Ignored
DislikedWith you there. Not sure why others would have had their order any higher than 1.0053 unless their charts showed different highs on the left. In fact 1.0051 is where I adjusted my order to as that is the high on the left.Ignored
DislikedShould you not be taking an average of the recent highs though to set your order? In this case, there were 4 recent highs made on H1 before the breakout at 58, 52, 53 and 62, so the average of this is 56 roughly, which is where I had my order originally. Only for me to pull it just before it was hit due to some poor US economic data announced just as the level was hit. What a fool I feel now! In hindsight, the slightly negative data was far outweighed by the amount of buy limit orders that must have been sitting at that level. Another lesson to...Ignored
DislikedI was taking a much longer term average, with a slight bias towards what had happened more recently. There were several 48s 49s and 50s earlier in the year. When I say I was taking an average, I don't mean literally counting all the highs and calculating it, I was estimating it by eye.Ignored
DislikedWith you there. Not sure why others would have had their order any higher than 1.0053 unless their charts showed different highs on the left. In fact 1.0051 is where I adjusted my order to as that is the high on the left.Ignored
DislikedWhat a fool I feel now! In hindsight, the slightly negative data was far outweighed by the amount of buy limit orders that must have been sitting at that level. Another lesson to be learnt.Ignored