New for me to be flexible about the rules apply only to pairs. New pairs are counted, because the subject of debate. New mutations in the fact that his face to me.
As a rule the waves overlap 1 to 4, 4 fame closure, 1 outside of the boundaries have to be. New counting rules in general and of those who knows it. But it is true or mutation? In today's era of speed. The minutes of a business sewerage patlasa duyuyor.Ew rules the whole world, not the laws of God of course. Formation of a system of intelligent, though it's a different response pattern.
I savunuyorum.Maddenin liquid, solid, there are 3 faces of steam. If you have or revision of Article 5? Sort of.
I should have flexibility in pairs. Defending it. Have a mutation. Think so.
Sorry for English, I use google translation.
New for me to be flexible about the rules apply only to pairs. New pairs are counted, because the subject of debate. New mutations in the fact that his face to me.
As a rule the waves overlap 1 to 4, 4 fame closure, 1 outside of the boundaries have to be. New counting rules in general and of those who knows it. But it is true or mutation? In today's era of speed. The minutes of a business sewerage patlasa duyuyor.Ew rules the whole world, not the laws of God of course. Formation of a system of intelligent, though it's a different response pattern.
I...
Ignored
Hi Emirler,
thank you for your answer.
The thing is:
If everyone creates his own EW style/counting, the result will be chaos.
There is one book of rules that withstand the times. And that are the rules of R:N. Elliott, Frost and Prechter.
Maybe you take the rules of Neeley, too. But keep in mind: Neeley's counting is relatively young. So we have to see over time.
Everytime I hear people complain about Elliott wave, that they feel they need new rules, guidelines, they first should consider their count to simply be wrong.
Regarding a wave 1 / wave 4 overlap: Prechter stated, that the overlap has to be meaningful (or such of that kind). an overlap by a few pips in especially Forex I am most of the time willing to tolerate on the smaler degrees.
If everyone creates his own EW style/counting, the result will be chaos.
There is one book of rules that withstand the times. And that are the rules of R:N. Elliott, Frost and Prechter.
Maybe you take the rules of Neeley, too. But keep in mind: Neeley's counting is relatively young. So we have to see over time.
Everytime I hear people complain about Elliott wave, that they feel they need new rules, guidelines, they first should consider their count to simply be wrong.
Regarding...
Ignored
hi infinitus
whats the actual title of the book by frost and prechter. i have elliot wave principles by same writers
regards
samuel
"Taking Responsibility is The Cornerstone of A Winning Attitude"
it is called elliot wave principle : key to market behaviour by frost and prechter.
Ignored
hey guys i just started reading that book and was trying a wave count for eur/usd. After some brainstorming, this is what i could come up with.
p.s: i know my nomenclature is incorrect, so please ignore it.
Elliot wave, Harmonic And Ichimoku in CHINESE STYLE
