Menu
Sister Sites

Options

Bookmark Thread

First Page First Unread Last Page Last Post

Print Thread

Similar Threads

Elliott Wave Trading by Ayax 2,104 replies

Elliott wave trading 94 replies

elliott wave trading channel 22 replies

Group Trading based on Elliott wave and Harmonics 0 replies

Elliotters..Elliott Wave Trading 9 replies

Attachments: Elliott Wave Trading
Exit Attachments

Elliott Wave Trading

here is my chart
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 1.GIF Size: 10 KB



--------
gann swings
The low of October 4 has been broken, we might be heading for a new low. Keep counting the waves correctly. And thanks to the contributors
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: gbpusd 23 dec 2011.gif Size: 10 KB


still in bullish trend
-------------------
forex systems
k wan ni indi
Attached File(s)
File Type: ex4 GP_Diamond.ex4   15 KB | 728 downloads
File Type: mq4 3 Daily Range Calculator.mq4   15 KB | 713 downloads
File Type: mq4 MTF_HI_LOW_v1.mq4   21 KB | 801 downloads
stock , commodity , bond , forex
first time in this thread...you guys look like you've got this nailed down.

How do you like the count here on gold? thanks.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: GC 2-12 60m.jpg Size: 129 KB
Could it be a turning point?
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Dow 2-4.jpg Size: 85 KB
I found the guy who keeps losing me money. Its "ME" SHOOT HIM!
azlan80 Thanks for those wonderful indicators
Quoting AZ-Heat
Could it be a turning point?
Hi AZ

Your count is plausible. Then the big downmove starts...

Olu
If you think you can or cannot do it you are correct
I would think we would pop 13,000 first
but may be not
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: ScreenHunter_01 Feb. 11 13.45.jpg Size: 86 KB
I found the guy who keeps losing me money. Its "ME" SHOOT HIM!
Quoting Olu
Hi AZ

Your count is plausible. Then the big downmove starts...

Olu
I highly doubt that, but let's see.
Quoting pkimnyc
I highly doubt that, but let's see.
Oh, this is most definitely going higher... and will end up closer to the 2007 high before it corrects lower...
No I haven't got the wave structure wrong! I've corrected it!
Quoting Ian Copsey
Oh, this is most definitely going higher... and will end up closer to the 2007 high before it corrects lower...
Hi Ian,
So are you looking for that high (closer to the 2007 high) to be wave a of 5? Then the pull back in wave b of 5.
I found the guy who keeps losing me money. Its "ME" SHOOT HIM!
Quoting Ian Copsey
Oh, this is most definitely going higher... and will end up closer to the 2007 high before it corrects lower...
I think it will go higher than that.. will see when we get there.
Quoting pkimnyc
I think it will go higher than that.. will see when we get there.
If it does get above, it won't be by much. I'd like it to be that way as it would show that traditional EW is wrong. This is Wave ((A)) of Wave ((V)) and currently we're mapping out Wave -iii- of Wave (c) of Wave (v)... Wave (a) of Wave (v) normally stall just below or just above the previous Wave (iii). (the 2007 high was Wave ((III)) and 2009 low Wave ((IV))... )

What's more there is a confluence of Dollar cycle lows - really major ones - 16.5 & 33 year cycle lows and that's going to hit the DOW also...
No I haven't got the wave structure wrong! I've corrected it!
Quoting AZ-Heat
Hi Ian,
So are you looking for that high (closer to the 2007 high) to be wave a of 5? Then the pull back in wave b of 5.
Yup!
Basically in line with the count I put in my book...
The pullback is likely to be quite deep I think. It'll have Prechter talking about "the biggest double top in history!" (after his "biggest head & shoulders in history...")
No I haven't got the wave structure wrong! I've corrected it!
Quoting Ian Copsey
This is Wave ((A)) of Wave ((V))
wave A of 5?
Quoting marf
wave A of 5?
Yes, you're late! I've been saying for months that the impulsive structure is wrong. It should be organized in 3's and not 5's. It's in the 3's where the wave relationships lie - not the 5's.

See: www.harmonic-ewave.com

and the Video
No I haven't got the wave structure wrong! I've corrected it!
Quoting Ian Copsey
Yes, you're late! I've been saying for months that the impulsive structure is wrong. It should be organized in 3's and not 5's. It's in the 3's where the wave relationships lie - not the 5's.

See: www.harmonic-ewave.com

and the Video
thanks Ian. Interesting.
Quoting Ian Copsey
If it does get above, it won't be by much. I'd like it to be that way as it would show that traditional EW is wrong. This is Wave ((A)) of Wave ((V)) and currently we're mapping out Wave -iii- of Wave (c) of Wave (v)... Wave (a) of Wave (v) normally stall just below or just above the previous Wave (iii). (the 2007 high was Wave ((III)) and 2009 low Wave ((IV))... )

What's more there is a confluence of Dollar cycle lows - really major ones - 16.5 & 33 year cycle lows and that's going to hit the DOW also...
Let's see. Ultimately, its up to the market.
Here is a short video providing examples of forecasts using Harmonic Elliott Wave. I hope it provides food for thought.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYsbl...xhEYjpztpe-WHH

Good luck
Ian
No I haven't got the wave structure wrong! I've corrected it!
1 trader viewing now