• Home
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • News
  • Calendar
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Login
  • Join
  • User/Email: Password:
  • 4:06am
Menu
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • News
  • Calendar
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Login
  • Join
  • 4:06am
Sister Sites
  • Metals Mine
  • Energy EXCH
  • Crypto Craft

Options

Bookmark Thread

First Page First Unread Last Page Last Post

Print Thread

Similar Threads

Automated Trading & ONLY Auto Trading 3 replies

Automated or semi automated trading? 3 replies

Coder needed: Trendline-Part of profitable system automated as an Indi 0 replies

Manual system that can't be Automated 13 replies

Can an automated trading system really work? 17 replies

  • Rookie Talk
  • /
  • Reply to Thread
  • Subscribe
Tags: Can be automated trading be profitable?
Cancel

Can be automated trading be profitable?

  • Last Post
  •  
  • 1 Page 23 4
  • 1 Page 23 4
  •  
  • Post #21
  • Quote
  • Nov 15, 2011 1:27am Nov 15, 2011 1:27am
  •  Custos
  • Joined Dec 2006 | Status: Member | 3,852 Posts
Quoting Du Jin Shan
Disliked
Hi custos,
May I know, What is your opinion about this thread title " Can be automated trading be profitable?"

Best regards
Jin Shan
Ignored
yes it can, if the strategy is tested thoroughly and works across many parameters. But from my experience this only applies to non-intraday strategies.
 
 
  • Post #22
  • Quote
  • Nov 15, 2011 1:39am Nov 15, 2011 1:39am
  •  Du Jin Shan
  • | Joined May 2011 | Status: D. J. Shan - De price Jockey | 332 Posts
Quoting Custos
Disliked
yes it can, if the strategy is tested thoroughly and works across many parameters. But from my experience this only applies to non-intraday strategies.
Ignored
Thanks for your reply Custos.
I have a silly thought about this . why pro trader like George soros or Warren buffet do not make an EA to trade for them.
they have a profitable statregy and its easy to put their strategy on EA. then they let the EA to trade for them. and enjoy life.

Whats your opinion about this.

Best regards,
Jin Shan
- 888 Horse Power - Fast Momentum Speed Run Towards VICTORY
 
 
  • Post #23
  • Quote
  • Nov 15, 2011 1:47am Nov 15, 2011 1:47am
  •  Custos
  • Joined Dec 2006 | Status: Member | 3,852 Posts
Quoting Du Jin Shan
Disliked
Thanks for your reply Custos.
I have a silly thought about this . why pro trader do not make an EA to trade for them.
they have a profitable statregy and its easy to put their strategy on EA. then they let the EA to trade for them. and enjoy life.

Whats your opinion about this.

Best regards,
Jin Shan
Ignored
yeah, that's actually what I did. But you have to realize that for many traders trading is part of the "enjoying life" theme. It is just such a fun game to guess which direction the markets will go and how participants will react to new world events, I truly can understand why even many hedge fund managers (like george soros, paul tudor jones,...) never stop trading based on reasoning rather than employing some EA's.
So yeah, I am right now half automated and half enjoying the game.

well, and anyways warren buffett's and george soros' strategy is impossible to code. They are purely based on fundamentals.
 
 
  • Post #24
  • Quote
  • Nov 15, 2011 2:03am Nov 15, 2011 2:03am
  •  Du Jin Shan
  • | Joined May 2011 | Status: D. J. Shan - De price Jockey | 332 Posts
Quoting Custos
Disliked
yeah, that's actually what I did. But you have to realize that for many traders trading is part of the "enjoying life" theme. It is just such a fun game to guess which direction the markets will go and how participants will react to new world events, I truly can understand why even many hedge fund managers (like george soros, paul tudor jones,...) never stop trading based on reasoning rather than employing some EA's.
So yeah, I am right now half automated and half enjoying the game.
Ignored
yeah, agree
IT's me. trading should be an enjoyable game. keep in a good mood (good psychology), stress free while trading can lead to a good decision. I'm always keep in this.:nerd:
If trading bring stress then dont get in this business, try other convensional business.

Quoting Custos
Disliked
well, and anyways warren buffett's and george soros' strategy is impossible to code. They are purely based on fundamentals.
Ignored
yaiks,
what a fool of me

Best regards,
Jin Shan
- 888 Horse Power - Fast Momentum Speed Run Towards VICTORY
 
 
  • Post #25
  • Quote
  • Dec 2, 2011 12:50am Dec 2, 2011 12:50am
  •  X.Oden
  • | Joined Feb 2006 | Status: Spartan Attitude | 1,500 Posts
I think you guys are leaving out a very tiny detail......and thus leaves your reasoning to be flawed in a large way. For the simple fact that you believe a strategy will stop working eventually means that you will at some point also change the way you trade....because of this, previous strategies that worked, then stopped will then work again...

the biggest variable in trading that you all seem to forget is market psychology, because of this simple fact of fear and greed, the market will continue to produce. Therefore, if you work with the markets, you will ALWAYS produce, whether its via an EA OR Manual Trading...

Hence the very reason that what some of the great traders of yesterday used, still hold as some of the golden rules in today's world of trading. All it takes is merely understanding the markets.

You can give two traders a winning strategy, but based on their experience and market psychology, both will trade it different even though the strategy produces profit....greed will always force one to continue to try to improve or tweak the system while the other who encounters a few losses will invalidate the system and try to do the same the other way thus creating the living entity of footprint we trade today.........
In Charts We Trust!
 
 
  • Post #26
  • Quote
  • Dec 2, 2011 8:42pm Dec 2, 2011 8:42pm
  •  Medran
  • | Joined Jul 2011 | Status: Member | 38 Posts
Quoting Kvn
Disliked
Hello, I'm new to FF and would like to start rookie discussion.

Not to many people on FF use an automated trading system(EA). Are they not profitable or it's almost impossible to find working one?

Kevin
Ignored
Hi Keven

The answer to your question is yes. In fact, a professional EA implementation of a proven strategy (based upon historical back-test) will almost certaintly win.

The reason this won't work for most people is that most people cannot program at a professional level. The ability to program, understand trading, have high risk tolerance and have a large amount of free capital is a very rare combination. But if you have all four trading can be the key to the kingdom.

I have a favourite quotation:

It is impossible to demonstrate empirically that a cause produces an effect. Just because the sun has risen every day since the beginning of the Earth does not mean that it will rise again tomorrow. However; it is impossible to go about one's life without assuming such connections, and the best that we can do is to maintain an open mind and never presume that we know any laws of causality for certain.
David Hume (1711-1776),
Scottish philosopher, economist, and historian.
From “An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding”.

So as David Hume says, if a strategy back-tests to an annual profit every year for the last ten years (as mine do) it is impossible to say that it will make a profit this year... but I am happy to bet that the sun will rise tomorrow.

Medran
 
 
  • Post #27
  • Quote
  • Dec 2, 2011 9:09pm Dec 2, 2011 9:09pm
  •  Turveyd
  • | Membership Revoked | Joined Aug 2006 | 11,977 Posts
NO

Until all of the above people actually find there dream EA, which trust me they haven't cause they wouldn't be posting on here or anyone else then that is the only answer.

A computer program, can't think it can't adapt it can't trade.

Banks don't give there traders Millions of $$$'s in bonus's for no reason what so ever , Banks don't use EA's, they use simple Buy / Sell programs which just buy many lots based on the traders rules.

The EA's which win the competitions do so by random chance, 99% lose a few win, run the test again and you'll get a different 1%.
Nothing to it, but to do it!!! Stick to the plan FOOL!!!!
 
 
  • Post #28
  • Quote
  • Dec 2, 2011 10:42pm Dec 2, 2011 10:42pm
  •  hedgeitall
  • | Joined Oct 2011 | Status: Member | 29 Posts
Quoting Turveyd
Disliked
NO

Until all of the above people actually find there dream EA, which trust me they haven't cause they wouldn't be posting on here or anyone else then that is the only answer.

A computer program, can't think it can't adapt it can't trade.

Banks don't give there traders Millions of $$$'s in bonus's for no reason what so ever , Banks don't use EA's, they use simple Buy / Sell programs which just buy many lots based on the traders rules.

The EA's which win the competitions do so by random chance, 99% lose a few win, run the test...
Ignored

That's funny!

What proof do you want? Do you want people to post their results? Do you want a contest. EA v Human?

I'll put an ea up against you any day Seriously! Lets end it once and for all )
 
 
  • Post #29
  • Quote
  • Dec 3, 2011 1:29am Dec 3, 2011 1:29am
  •  first_major
  • | Joined Jan 2011 | Status: Member | 23 Posts
I double you...
you are 100% right, besides, what about level and psychology .. an EA will never replace a human.

Quoting Du Jin Shan
Disliked
"can be automated trading be profitable?"

I think no, why?

  1. Because EA have no psychology

  1. it never care about your account equity, whether your equity is in danger

  1. it will always trade when there is a signal, this will lead to overtrading

  1. EA cant read the market psychology level


If it is true, there is a profitable EA, no one gonna share it for free, or sell it for for hundreds of bucks.

Best Regards,
Jin Shan

Ignored
 
 
  • Post #30
  • Quote
  • Dec 6, 2011 5:31am Dec 6, 2011 5:31am
  •  Kvn
  • | Joined Jun 2011 | Status: Member | 59 Posts
Quoting first_major
Disliked
.. an EA will never replace a human.
Ignored
Totally agree with you. At the moment it will definitely not.
But we don't know what future can bring us...

Kevin
 
 
  • Post #31
  • Quote
  • Dec 6, 2011 6:36am Dec 6, 2011 6:36am
  •  Turveyd
  • | Membership Revoked | Joined Aug 2006 | 11,977 Posts
Quoting Kvn
Disliked
Totally agree with you. At the moment it will definitely not.
But we don't know what future can bring us...

Kevin
Ignored

I'm in that camp to, much like me, when tech changes in the future and they have real AI then that will change my opinion.

They've just replicated 1 neuron with 200 micro chips, they just have to get that in network with several trillion other neurons and they've cracked it, so not in our life times or like the kids of our kids kids.
Nothing to it, but to do it!!! Stick to the plan FOOL!!!!
 
 
  • Post #32
  • Quote
  • Dec 6, 2011 2:40pm Dec 6, 2011 2:40pm
  •  Custos
  • Joined Dec 2006 | Status: Member | 3,852 Posts
Quoting first_major
Disliked
I double you...
you are 100% right, besides, what about level and psychology .. an EA will never replace a human.
Ignored
a couple of years ago, people thought a program could never beat the world master in chess.
How did that pan out again?
 
 
  • Post #33
  • Quote
  • Dec 6, 2011 2:43pm Dec 6, 2011 2:43pm
  •  Turveyd
  • | Membership Revoked | Joined Aug 2006 | 11,977 Posts
Quoting Custos
Disliked
a couple of years ago, people thought a program could never beat the world master in chess.
How did that pan out again?
Ignored
Chess is a different story, it's got fixed rules and basically the computer just brute forced him, considering every move up 10moves ahead to find the best play, hard for any human to beat that.

They can't make a strategy, but they can adapt great to each turn and make the optimal move.
Nothing to it, but to do it!!! Stick to the plan FOOL!!!!
 
 
  • Post #34
  • Quote
  • Dec 6, 2011 2:48pm Dec 6, 2011 2:48pm
  •  Custos
  • Joined Dec 2006 | Status: Member | 3,852 Posts
Quoting Turveyd
Disliked
Chess is a different story, it's got fixed rules and basically the computer just brute forced him, considering every move up 10moves ahead to find the best play, hard for any human to beat that.

They can't make a strategy, but they can adapt great to each turn and make the optimal move.
Ignored
well, everything has fixed rules. Some are more complicated than others. Market behavior also follows rules. Only cause you can't see rules in the markets, doesn't mean a computer in a couple of years can't find relevant really complex rules that outperform the best traders.
After all, successful traders also follow rules, some are just hard to articulate.

It is ridiculous to believe that computers won't advance to a point where they outperform human brains.
 
 
  • Post #35
  • Quote
  • Dec 6, 2011 3:13pm Dec 6, 2011 3:13pm
  •  Turveyd
  • | Membership Revoked | Joined Aug 2006 | 11,977 Posts
Quoting Custos
Disliked
well, everything has fixed rules. Some are more complicated than others. Market behavior also follows rules. Only cause you can't see rules in the markets, doesn't mean a computer in a couple of years can't find relevant really complex rules that outperform the best traders.
After all, successful traders also follow rules, some are just hard to articulate.

It is ridiculous to believe that computers won't advance to a point where they outperform human brains.
Ignored

Doesn't mean they cam do either
Nothing to it, but to do it!!! Stick to the plan FOOL!!!!
 
 
  • Post #36
  • Quote
  • Dec 7, 2011 1:36am Dec 7, 2011 1:36am
  •  Du Jin Shan
  • | Joined May 2011 | Status: D. J. Shan - De price Jockey | 332 Posts
Quoting Custos
Disliked
well, everything has fixed rules. Some are more complicated than others. Market behavior also follows rules. Only cause you can't see rules in the markets, doesn't mean a computer in a couple of years can't find relevant really complex rules that outperform the best traders.
After all, successful traders also follow rules, some are just hard to articulate.

It is ridiculous to believe that computers won't advance to a point where they outperform human brains.
Ignored
yes, i know that chess computer, chess master either cannt beat it.

and how about the computer that can beat the market. I think it will never happen, because computer have no money. LOLs it can't move the market

as we know there is someone that moves the market we know it as big player(smart money). yes, they have a rule in moving this huge market. knowing their rule can't guarantee computer will success. because there is another factors the big players considerate on, for example fundamentals factor or market psychology level.

One thing and the most important thing that computer dont have is psychology. computer can't make a consideration

And BTW i bet someday there will be a human that can beat the chess computer. human full of unlimited potential
- 888 Horse Power - Fast Momentum Speed Run Towards VICTORY
 
 
  • Post #37
  • Quote
  • Dec 7, 2011 4:45am Dec 7, 2011 4:45am
  •  Irish-cream
  • | Joined Dec 2011 | Status: Junior Member | 2 Posts
Hi,
I am also new to Forex and I thought that until I get the idea of how to trade manually, I may try automated trading.
I found some information about mirror trading on the web and I wanted to ask if you know anything about it. I opened a Mirror Trader account with FXCM and I see they have many strategies there. (I know I'm not an expert, but some strategies seems pretty good)
My question is: did anyone tried the "Mirror Trader"?
Any tips about how to recognize good strategies (beside looking at the graphs)?

Thanks!
 
 
  • Post #38
  • Quote
  • Dec 7, 2011 3:15pm Dec 7, 2011 3:15pm
  •  Forexnuts
  • | Joined Nov 2011 | Status: Member | 1,160 Posts
EA's being profitable - that has to be the joke of the millenium. Yea, coin me a new moniker as a EA naysayer..
Here's why there're no profitable EA's and there will be none.
Human nature: Let's face it, as a species, we are not very charitable to our friends, colleagues and even strangers on this forum. As such, we are churlish by nature and would not want to share any "golden goose" with any one.
Imagine a EA that works perfectly all the time..do you know what the price would be on that product? It would be literally priceless.

The second factor, is this...imagine if every trader had access to the same EA copy, the one that works all the time..now, imagine a market where every move is predicted and can u imagine how this scenario would play out..

And of course, the third one happens to be the trillion dollar query "Is an EA, one that adapts in real time possible" and the answer..no. Nope and even if someone comes along and develops one, he is not going to he handing it out to anyone.

And for the proEA-bytes out there, if you're really sure that EA is the best way to go and you have access to one that really works, let's trim up that bet..fork over $100 as seed money, will trade you against the EA in question on a 2:1 and should the EA succeed..well, we just move on.

What about the $200 I am supposed to hand over should the EA turn out to be for real [notice that I am not holding my breath], well, you don't really need the money, do ya? You got an EA that's working, so you have all the money in the world and let's just call it a case of that strange EA thread and move on.

Advisement: Do note, parts of the above reply are made in jest and for the record, my views on EA are clearly stated above. thank you and have a nice day!
 
 
  • Post #39
  • Quote
  • Dec 8, 2011 7:08am Dec 8, 2011 7:08am
  •  Ray234
  • | Additional Username | Joined Dec 2011 | 1 Post
Quoting Irish-cream
Disliked
Hi,
I am also new to Forex and I thought that until I get the idea of how to trade manually, I may try automated trading.
I found some information about mirror trading on the web and I wanted to ask if you know anything about it. I opened a Mirror Trader account with FXCM and I see they have many strategies there. (I know I'm not an expert, but some strategies seems pretty good)
My question is: did anyone tried the "Mirror Trader"?
Any tips about how to recognize good strategies (beside looking at the graphs)?

Thanks!
Ignored
Hi Irish cream,
I am using the Mirror Trader platform as well , i think its a great tool.
i found out that when i am clicking on the name of the strategy a window is openning and i am able to see more statistics about the strtategies , and more visual data.
if you can find more details about how to find the best stratehy please answer and if anyone else know anything more please help.
 
 
  • Post #40
  • Quote
  • Dec 8, 2011 2:57pm Dec 8, 2011 2:57pm
  •  benkrah
  • | Joined Jul 2009 | Status: Member | 4 Posts
Hi Iris-cream,

If you have some small idea with trading i suggest you to use their "semi" option.
look at the graph, decide if you go long or short and mirror a trade of a starategy with good ratio between avg. Take profit and avr. Stop Loss.
it has been working for me for the last few month.

if you want me to explain more let me know...

good luck!


Quoting Irish-cream
Disliked
Hi,
I am also new to Forex and I thought that until I get the idea of how to trade manually, I may try automated trading.
I found some information about mirror trading on the web and I wanted to ask if you know anything about it. I opened a Mirror Trader account with FXCM and I see they have many strategies there. (I know I'm not an expert, but some strategies seems pretty good)
My question is: did anyone tried the "Mirror Trader"?
Any tips about how to recognize good strategies (beside looking at the graphs)?

Thanks!
Ignored
 
 
  • Rookie Talk
  • /
  • Can be automated trading be profitable?
  • Reply to Thread
    • 1 Page 23 4
    • 1 Page 23 4
0 traders viewing now
  • More
Top of Page
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
About FF
  • Mission
  • Products
  • User Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Blog
  • Contact
FF Products
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • Calendar
  • News
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Trade Explorer
FF Website
  • Homepage
  • Search
  • Members
  • Report a Bug
Follow FF
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

FF Sister Sites:

  • Metals Mine
  • Energy EXCH
  • Crypto Craft

Forex Factory® is a brand of Fair Economy, Inc.

Terms of Service / ©2023