Scalper challenge

Ok i added 9,21,34,55,89,233 expo MAs, so whats the deal here? You got some big fat red lines for the stoch and MACD, i guess thats important levels huh? Dollars been kind crappy friday, picking up a bit today, bit of break upside through the fibo MAs in the morning, now its looking like it can go either way, but will probably drop a few pips into the fibo MAs.

Looking a bit heavy to me so probably going through the 233 but not at all used to looking at USDCAD and especially not at M5 so im in the dark here pretty much.

Ill have to be carefull so the USDCAD is not the active window in MT4, dont want to be looking at E/U M1 and be placing orders on U/C M5, made enough of misstakes like that in the past going like: "Hey wheres the lines for my deal? Oh wrong pair, damnit." Sometimes i closed those in profit since it was often a mixup between E/U and G/U and they arent to much different. I think i even placed two or more trades like that, placing an order, nothing happend so i thought: "Requote" and made it again, and nothing again, and then maybe i see whats going on in the trade tab...not nice.

the red fat line in macd stoch is pretty much useless,i just found it there

i just thinned it out now

man ive been going crazy with pips this week


lol
man
or if u want just use the normal smoothed ma of 250,500 delete the 50-100 they are just noise,but they can be of great help too
my oriiginal idea was with 250-500 because it showed great opportunites on this pair
u know this pair reminds of a school bully,who are so though in school,but when they at home ,they have to listen to their parents strictly and get beaten up by their dads
in this case usdcad gets beaten up by the ma 250-500 because it needs to learn some rules that being wild is not the way,manners need to be taught,discipline
lol

Interesting, hope it's true. Reservations:
I used to collect rocks/fossils/caves 10y in a geologically diverse (covered Paleozoic, except Permian (how: most of bedrock vertical)) county, and the pictures I saw appear to be clay sediment and lake bed ripples and waves (stone waves are really cool, I've got one somewhere).
Maybe ancients created something with the pavement-like geological features, but I doubt they made them.
The large stone spheres are interesting. Iron and geodes naturally do this, only the spheres were large and someone said they examined them.
(sources: 1,2,3)

Damn im not used to reading CCIs, that 1.3445 area S/R save my butt, that was pure luck.

Second time today i get into bad stuff today.

Todays winner so far is...drumroll 2.1 ! YAY!

I was going to jank the cable for my heater out and put in the living room since my wife just got up from bed (its -16 outside and they owner of my place is evidently saving up on heating bill). However i janked the wrong cable and i janked cables to my computer! This day just keeps getting better and better... NOT

Yes i think so too, so hwo did, and how? I mean the sun pyramid in Bosnia is 220 metres, thats just ballistic! Biggest one i Giza is what, 150, 160? If they hauled the stone by hand it would take...oh i mean thousands of years for a big crew of many thousands of people to make it!

And in Egypt to transport it?

Well i think the egyptians just used the Pyramids, they have no clue how they where made.

Ok not 40.000+

"There are five (5) pyramids in Bosnia and it is said that they are 12000-26000 years old." According to european union times.

And in the same article that ha-pattern posted

"UNESCO and the CIA are planning to make the Bosnian Pyramid Valley the world’s largest and most valuable historical monuments by 2012." Why is CIA involved in that? And why are they planning that in 2012, why not 2013 or 2011 or 2017?



Im not a geologists, but that doesnt at all look natural to me. Those tunnels in the european times done either.

http://irna.lautre.net/IMG/jpg/726518nov.jpg

Yet this people are claiming so

http://www.bosnian-pyramid.net/Pyram...snian-pyramid/



I scared my wife laughing at about 1:20 in this part where the archeologists explains that a tourists thought well you put 200 people on that side and 200 people on the other, in a what, 1.5 by 6 meter space each? 12.000 to 26.000 years ago? In late stone age period technology, whitout cranes, without machines, probably without even wheels and pulleys and horses? On a mountainside?

Cube your E/U shorts are looking a little less sorry for every day that passes now, everything is on top of Euro now weighing down.

hm,atlantis?

i watched an interview with this university proffesor and he says the story of atlantis only became famous out of a book
there is no real evidence for it
hmmm,

wau,interesting stuff
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosnian_pyramids

Well its a legend, a lost city, i mean there are a lot of lost cities. I have no clue how the pyramids are built, there are no evidence to go on, none that i know of. You could speculate, that wont do no good. There are no theory of how they where built and no evidence. Sure there is a guy saying "Well maybe if they built ramps and whatnot." Would still take almost infinetely long time to built it, let alone carve rocks into laserguided precision slabs with bronzeage tools and haul them a long way.

If people are bying into the Wikipedia crap they are obviously as demented Yuri Bezmenov told us they where being subverted into becoming. I mean why is that crap still on Wikipedia? Maybe nobody has updated it yet.

Hi yaed
Oh, yes of course. Time will coming but the Broker has now closen this demo account after exactly 1 month (with a big win of 70%). What a pity! I would show that the open positions could run in a win sooner or later. So I think I trade only with my real accounts further on and have close my TCT thread today and will more pass time with yard work (gardening), fitness, reading books & the psychological praxis.

If you like I will give some constructive comments also in the future here and there and some examples of my way of scalping.

Kindest regards
FXcube

Yes i would very much like all your comments, of any type. I read a book Freud was hard pressed to wright in his later days. People nagged him for not giving any practical advice on how to conduct psychoanalysis, and finally he wrote some essays about it and someone collected them. That and Draumdeutung (not sure of the german spelling) is always and ever etched into my brain juice. Cant se i like all his practices, but people has givein him a lot of blame that he did not deserve. It may be that he exagerated his claims when having the specificity of his patience in mind.

However i regard the present day psychiatrical practice with avarice, its extremely deamining oftentimes, pouring drugs into people with no concern of pretty much anything, damn pagmatics and their bullshit. Modern day psychology is mostly degenerate, i am very much ashamed of the direction all of behavioural science in practice such as in education and psychiatry has taken, it seems few can treat human beings as intelligent, thinking beings like we all are, from the smallest infant to the oldest and most senile demented still are.

Still, every generation needs its revolution, and just like in Wienna about 100 years ago, i a friend of a friend is trying to tie social nots in that spirit, in those coffee houses. It must be done, it must be done earlier better then sooner and the whole of academia, especially behavioural science is in dire need of fresh things. Just like Max Weber pointed out about 150 years ago, every institution has a life of its own and wants to just grow and grow and grow. The whole apparatus has staled into a putrid, decaying filthy thing i would not touch with a 10 foot pole, to express it mildly

There are of course pockets of people doing something interesting, at least treating people like something other then meaningless lab rats swimming around in a pond, with minced brains from other mice injected into their skulls.

We must always and ever stay vigilante and always strive for those things just beyond the horizon, things we cant really understand, but therefore must. We must reinterpret love, work, money, all institutions and the hwole of human existence. Every generation must do it, discuss it, be angered about it, abandon it, get back to it, scrap it all and begin again and so on. We must because its our legacy and we should not let it rot away. I dont see much of my generation do it, i dont see much of any generation do it as of now. The universities is full of the putrid smell of old things that cannot ever be challenged.

If i had the power to, i would pull the plug on at least 75% of the research at universities. I have been at discertations, repeated times where people just dont care of, they dont care about the PHD publication written, they dont care about if its been done over and over again in sligtly different format just a couple of months earlier, and they dont care for its content even in the slightest.

The universities in many countries i would think (from reading their so called "litterature"), and in Sweden in particular has become a place where you write something unintelligible and totally meaningless for a crowd of hollow eyed, uncaring people so they can just give a big sigh about the hwole thing and go drink coffee and talk about meaningless repeatative subjects of no significance, even to themselves. Its a place to make a really boring career, you get paid, shut up and read something from a halfassed so called "book" for a group of uncaring students who have no interest in the subject.

I know and hope you are better then that. So what of this field of late, concerning in particular what newly written litterature do you consider interesting? I am asking you so that i wont have to wath through these rivers of Hades to say the least, to get one little page of perhaps something that someone actually thought about before they wrote.


By the way: Alpari has a habit of taking my demo accounts away, even though they shouldnt be time limited. I have another friend hwo lost a bunch of pretend money on his account, and its still there... funny right?

http://www.dinosauria.com/dml/history.htm

I wouldnt want to be born about 322 miljon years ago in Kinderscoutian sub sub sub period to Carboniferous:

"So where are you from?"

"Kinderscoutian."

Eerie silence.

"No really?"

Ok i see, might be down my venue, is there any english translation?

I see its from 1967, do you have anything contemporary in mind as of late?

EDIT: They didnt have it at the university, not in German, not in English. I went with Paul Feyerabend instead.

But that was no divergence so how could you tell to enter?

After a bit of a loss im beginning to take this Ecofin meeting seriously might go demo today and see how that works out.

I am almost sure i will rack in nice profits, taunting me that its not real money (as far as "real money" is actually ever real money.) This time ill use SL.

I am wondering if you try to see a divergence develop on say M5, and then as you see it also on M1 you start putting positions there right? With the probability confidence from M5 and such right?

Yes i see what you mean.

But isnt that a pretty nice divergence? At the bolly, pointing down...

EDIT: Anyway are you comfortable trading the Ecofin meeting and things like that?

EDIT 2: I think its pretty usefull do try to define a certain level of CCI as a certain behaviour such as: strong buy/selling, and then try to read how often each behaviour occurs to try to understand future direction: simply if many times are shown strong behaviour of either kind, thats where things will go.

EDIT 3: the M1 candle 10:28 on E/U was really interesting if anyone saw that, nothing happend for a long time, about 15 seconds, so thats the market definition of nothing to glean, noone has any advantage in doing anything. I find these ocations very interesting.

To no surprise, switching to demo is just fine.

That big loss was some neglected old H1 trade i closed when using the Close all script (That Cube posted in separate thread).

I really think a trained eye can do divergence without CCI, i mean its all there either way, the calculation can be done as estimation intra consiousnes, might be better, might be worse who knows (only the one that tries).

Now ill have some lunch.

That 1.3523 area on E/U looks like well bought

Well i dont really see the importance of switching the timeframes to read different CCIs. Lets say use M5, and if you want to have a CCI from M15, just add one to the same indicator window with the period x4, and for H1 just period x12 and H4 period x48 and such. Of course the calculation will get a bit different since its calculated on closed candles, and a sample of many more, but that will just give the reading some more resolution. At least accomodating for the jaggedness of the increased resolution would result in using only one indicator window for multiple things, which should make things more simple.

Heres an example of what i mean, the M15 CCI period is multiplied by 4 (56) while the H1 is still 14. I placed a vertical line to indicate new day at both TFs.