Hi folks
I pretty much make my livelyhood through MAs. Recently i had a look at a strategy that uses non lag MA, and i thought i might incorporate it into my existing strategy, if there is an advantage in doing so.
The MAs i use for moving S/R is 20, 39, 69, 200 on M1 apply to close, exponential, the MA 200 being the strongest, something you can count on in 90% chance of halting price when things are moving a bit. These are quite generic, and tells me something about almost all pairs/gold/oil or whatever. It would seem they get pretty physical/respected at M30 and H4 too. So it really seem to have to do with the human subconsious, or its just that central banks have these MAs and respect them/look at them. Not that i understand why they bother with M1, therefore im not sure that they do.
I use 4 other MAs for levels/channels to contain price, calculated for 4 diffrent strenghts of PA pushing its waves through the market. There probably is no point in me going into this deeper then this, because there is a lot to say about it.
These MAs that i use, is not non lag MAs, but i am wondering if there is something i am missing because im not using non lag MAs. Ive had a look around for info in non lag MAs, but i havent yet found what i was looking for.
So my wish is to work on some things together.
I use levels on some of my existing MAs as i said, but i cant seem to find this function in the non lag MA v.7.1.1. I would want to be able to make visual levels at certain distances from the MA, lets say 8, 13 or 23 pips away, just as we can do with the MT 4 stock MA. How can that be achived with the non lag MA? Maybe it is possible and i just missed something...
What is the diffrence between a MA and a non lag MA mathematicaly? Obviously the non lag MA follows the price more closely, but how is this calculated?
I pretty much make my livelyhood through MAs. Recently i had a look at a strategy that uses non lag MA, and i thought i might incorporate it into my existing strategy, if there is an advantage in doing so.
The MAs i use for moving S/R is 20, 39, 69, 200 on M1 apply to close, exponential, the MA 200 being the strongest, something you can count on in 90% chance of halting price when things are moving a bit. These are quite generic, and tells me something about almost all pairs/gold/oil or whatever. It would seem they get pretty physical/respected at M30 and H4 too. So it really seem to have to do with the human subconsious, or its just that central banks have these MAs and respect them/look at them. Not that i understand why they bother with M1, therefore im not sure that they do.
I use 4 other MAs for levels/channels to contain price, calculated for 4 diffrent strenghts of PA pushing its waves through the market. There probably is no point in me going into this deeper then this, because there is a lot to say about it.
These MAs that i use, is not non lag MAs, but i am wondering if there is something i am missing because im not using non lag MAs. Ive had a look around for info in non lag MAs, but i havent yet found what i was looking for.
So my wish is to work on some things together.
I use levels on some of my existing MAs as i said, but i cant seem to find this function in the non lag MA v.7.1.1. I would want to be able to make visual levels at certain distances from the MA, lets say 8, 13 or 23 pips away, just as we can do with the MT 4 stock MA. How can that be achived with the non lag MA? Maybe it is possible and i just missed something...
What is the diffrence between a MA and a non lag MA mathematicaly? Obviously the non lag MA follows the price more closely, but how is this calculated?
My signature is: "Classified".