Maybe a fragment of glass in the sand would be a good analogy.
Thanks for that explanation about Bug's chart, it clears a lot of things up in my head SC.
Concerning the Jacko thread Bad apple, I mentioned it to Mike yesterday.
Crazy, making comments like that in that thread, it has become Cromwell's witch hunt. And, we all know how many innocent people they burnt, all of them.
Thanks for that explanation about Bug's chart, it clears a lot of things up in my head SC.
Concerning the Jacko thread Bad apple, I mentioned it to Mike yesterday.
Crazy, making comments like that in that thread, it has become Cromwell's witch hunt. And, we all know how many innocent people they burnt, all of them.
IMHO, all of it should be included in your analysis.
think of the traffic as chocolate, the big bar as a bag or pile of sand.
when a piece of chocolate is hid under a pile of sand or inside a bag,do u consider the chocolate non-existent?
i think this is the same case as your question.
the traffic behind that big bar is part of the history, part of the recent action, part of what happened, so i think it should be part of your consideration.
u can also look at how the traffic formed. looking exclusively at that chart, 1.0550-80ish seems to be a...
