Hello xmph,
xmph;3994549]Please read my previous as per putting the box at SR .... bad idea.
I know it was a bad idea for you to say that. I forgive.
Please I'm all eyes and ears please show me a better solution.
for the 100% accurate that shows probability of success .... if it shows anything else than 100%, then you have a bug. Come on Johnny, did you succeed in modeling human emotions .... if so you should talk to DARPA, I'm sure they'd be interested.
The method is 100% accurate how can you beat that? It wasn't even all my idea as my son helped. I knew that college would make that boy smart.
No bugs and I feel fine but thanks for asking. Show me a losing trade with my revised box method. Please show me as the elimination of losing trades in a particular method is the only way to improve the end result. Finding these code or method errors is like finding little diamonds. I welcome all with open arms who posts any and all logic errors or holes in my method. I absolutely take nothing personally so go ahead unless you get personal then that's a horse of a different color.
No seriously, I agree with the concept of SR ... but don't over do it.
How can you over do the use of the SRs? That's like saying making too much money is a bad thing.
I already tried multiple add-ons to Squalou's codes (and Mer's method in extent), and I may say that up to now, nothing passes a 2004 till now backtest except using the original method with appropriate parameters.
Then the only logical solution is to shoot the coder. Sorry it's only business.
What would be nice Johnny is you provide daily chart of your trades with a box placed at SR without any StopLoss (come on again ... whether you put one, or you stick in front of your computer and be a human StopLoss .... I would accept you mentioning a dynamic StopLoss based on SR and Risk ratio). I wonder what would really happen.
I will not be prey for the stoploss hunters. I will not be prey for the stoploss hunters. I will not be prey for the stoploss hunters. I'm not going to play your game and become a Forex trainer here. I don't even trade this chart as it is not ready to trade as advertised as far as I'm concerned much less trading the EA. Nothing personal just my opinion. Why give up a tried and true method for a new one.
The discussion is about the box placement and alternate ways to trade the box and not how I trade. Let's keep the discussion relevant shall we.
I may add .... you told Squalou about "fallacies" regarding time and price action/direction (I think you went strong on him so I allow myself for the next comment) ..... but my friend .... what is Support and Resistance to you (don't tell anyone, I think a reversal is a price action direction for a given time period) ? Ooops
Something was lost in the translation. I don't understand Chinese but that's alright.
Aren't you the one who said the backtest only had a 1.++ something profit factor? And you're telling me this is the best you can do even with changing the code? If you didn't reach a PF factor of 10 on the revised code then you haven't even begun to reach coder stardom. Tell me you're just kidding. And you're calling me crazy?
All good fun my friend but I really must get on with other things. Thanks for the chat.
Here's hoping your trade makes it out of the box you put it in,
Johnny
PS: I let mine out of the box to run to the profit lines. It's funny just how much faster the profits rise without that darn box slowing them down. It's like a race horse running a race with a 300 pound jockey. Just get a little jockey and the horse will run faster. In this case get a tiny box and don't put the price inside it.
Cheers
xmph;3994549]Please read my previous as per putting the box at SR .... bad idea.
I know it was a bad idea for you to say that. I forgive.
Please I'm all eyes and ears please show me a better solution.
for the 100% accurate that shows probability of success .... if it shows anything else than 100%, then you have a bug. Come on Johnny, did you succeed in modeling human emotions .... if so you should talk to DARPA, I'm sure they'd be interested.
The method is 100% accurate how can you beat that? It wasn't even all my idea as my son helped. I knew that college would make that boy smart.
No bugs and I feel fine but thanks for asking. Show me a losing trade with my revised box method. Please show me as the elimination of losing trades in a particular method is the only way to improve the end result. Finding these code or method errors is like finding little diamonds. I welcome all with open arms who posts any and all logic errors or holes in my method. I absolutely take nothing personally so go ahead unless you get personal then that's a horse of a different color.
No seriously, I agree with the concept of SR ... but don't over do it.
How can you over do the use of the SRs? That's like saying making too much money is a bad thing.
I already tried multiple add-ons to Squalou's codes (and Mer's method in extent), and I may say that up to now, nothing passes a 2004 till now backtest except using the original method with appropriate parameters.
Then the only logical solution is to shoot the coder. Sorry it's only business.
What would be nice Johnny is you provide daily chart of your trades with a box placed at SR without any StopLoss (come on again ... whether you put one, or you stick in front of your computer and be a human StopLoss .... I would accept you mentioning a dynamic StopLoss based on SR and Risk ratio). I wonder what would really happen.
I will not be prey for the stoploss hunters. I will not be prey for the stoploss hunters. I will not be prey for the stoploss hunters. I'm not going to play your game and become a Forex trainer here. I don't even trade this chart as it is not ready to trade as advertised as far as I'm concerned much less trading the EA. Nothing personal just my opinion. Why give up a tried and true method for a new one.
The discussion is about the box placement and alternate ways to trade the box and not how I trade. Let's keep the discussion relevant shall we.
I may add .... you told Squalou about "fallacies" regarding time and price action/direction (I think you went strong on him so I allow myself for the next comment) ..... but my friend .... what is Support and Resistance to you (don't tell anyone, I think a reversal is a price action direction for a given time period) ? Ooops
Something was lost in the translation. I don't understand Chinese but that's alright.
Aren't you the one who said the backtest only had a 1.++ something profit factor? And you're telling me this is the best you can do even with changing the code? If you didn't reach a PF factor of 10 on the revised code then you haven't even begun to reach coder stardom. Tell me you're just kidding. And you're calling me crazy?
All good fun my friend but I really must get on with other things. Thanks for the chat.
Here's hoping your trade makes it out of the box you put it in,
Johnny
PS: I let mine out of the box to run to the profit lines. It's funny just how much faster the profits rise without that darn box slowing them down. It's like a race horse running a race with a 300 pound jockey. Just get a little jockey and the horse will run faster. In this case get a tiny box and don't put the price inside it.
Cheers