- Joined May 2005 | Status: Member | 1,494 Posts
In trading, there is no bullshit. You either make money or you don't.
Problems viewing GBP/JPY charts 3 replies
Looking for a platform allowing viewing of historic charts 0 replies
Need help: Viewing "historic" charts 2 replies
Dislikedthis will be my last post for sometime again. FF is still not ready yet. I will test them maybe again next year. Wishing you wellIgnored
DislikedFor those of you who are curious to know if this works or not, Major Ed Dames was the head of the remote viewing unit of the US army. He produced a 4 disc set describing the process in detail...Ignored
DislikedRemote Viewing works. End of story.
Can it be used to predict movements in the FOREX markets? Yes, though it isn't by any means a holy grail. Here's one method:
ARV (associative remote viewing)
Take two outcomes:
A: GBP/USD will NOT breach 1.55 by Friday
B: GBP/USD WILL breach 1.55 by Friday
Now find two photographs/images, print them off. On the back of one write outcome A and on the back of the other write outcome B. Make sure that the two pictures are of wholly different things (eg volcano erupting vs kitten)
Assign two four...Ignored
DislikedLMAO typical dark ages response. You guys are clearly unaware of current quantum physics theory, the non-linearity of time, the masses and masses of scientific work on non-local perception, mirror neurons and a whole host of other research and theory that not only supports the reality of remote viewing but actually predicts it as a function of reality.Ignored
DislikedYOU'RE the one wasting people's time; you clearly have no interest in the subject and thus are posting only to attack something and someone you know nothing about.Ignored
DislikedI am gauging from your reliance on heavy fonts that you are probably in your early teens so I guess that's to be expected.Ignored
DislikedI am simply trying to explain to anyone interested how RV CAN be used to make money, with a lot of time, practice and talent. Check out this guy who averaged a 62% prediction rate over a span of some 3000 ARV trials. I believe he also made a significant amount of money in the process:
http://www.remote-viewing.com/indexmain.html,Ignored
It seems that every attempt to experimentally disprove the presence of the effect is instead leading to more evidence strongly supporting it by easily producing z-scores up to 3 and beyond (which alone would already be treated like undeniable proof in many other areas). It's not easy to brush aside an effect that is clearly showing its presence the stronger the more and better measurements one does. And why should one want to brush it aside anyways? It does not violate our current understanding of physics in any way.
You sound like the Spanish inquisition insisting on the earth being the center of the universe while every single measurement and calculation ever made is screaming the opposite and even your own mathematical models and understanding would perfectly permit it, even favor it, only your holy dogma is prohibiting it for no reason.
If you want to dismiss the well observed effects of RV as wrong you would have to do at least one of the following:
There is currently simply no reason to doubt the existence of these effects after they have been observed and their strength been measured and documented by so many different researchers and reputable scientific organizations and universities around the world, instead one would be a fool to stubbornly deny this reality, maybe your true name is Don Quixote?
QuoteDislikedgood luck with your scam
DislikedLOL Damo
I agree it's a bit of a head-hurter. Check out this little slide-show (not mine) for a bit more clarity on how ARV works:
http://www.remote-viewing.com/
eh? I'm not selling anything here, just distributing information. Feel free to investigate or ignore as you see fit...Ignored