What I'm saying is, given X lot size at location A, there exists a Y lot size at location B, such that risk is minimized and profit is maximized.
Dislikedgive an optimized lot size for every single position
DislikedSo the addition of another theoretical factor was that; give an optimized lot size for every single position, there exists (in theory at the time) an equation of which when applied, the derivative of all the formula for that derived position would be a derivative of itself... Basically, the system would be fractal in nature, and "eat" upon itself. This was a staggering theory, because that would mean, if it were true, a phi-like subdivision (derivative) and thus also a phi-like integration (Integral) would exist..
DislikedThis would mean, given a single position, if the position was profitable, then ALL SUBSEQUENT POSITIONS WOULD BE GUARANTEED PROFITABLE. And.. I've now been able to prove it to be mathematically true..
DislikedThis would mean, given a single position, if the position was profitable, then ALL SUBSEQUENT POSITIONS WOULD BE GUARANTEED PROFITABLE. And.. I've now been able to prove it to be mathematically true..Ignored
DislikedWhat I'm saying is, given X lot size at location A, there exists a Y lot size at location B, such that risk is minimized and profit is maximized.Ignored
DislikedYou scan for a trend, according to definition, and when found, put a lot X (transaction 1, X MUST be larger than Y)at point A. In that moment you do not know if the transaction will be a winner or loser. Using the formula, you determine point B and lot size Y (transaction 2). WHEN and IF the price reaches point B and activates lot Y, in that moment of time and space, you KNOW the lot X will be a winner, regardless of future price moves (the stop is now at the distance B and even if the price retraces and ejects both transactions, 1 in plus and 2...
DislikedI use it in my trading right now. Why wouldn't I? Wouldn't you??Ignored
DislikedYou got it! Cool huh???
DislikedAfter I was able to determine that my new equation did indeed cross at a (price/risk) // (price/profit) ratio cross point; then took a derivative of the equation, and give me a way to plug everything I wanted/needed.
DislikedIf I treat A as a B, since I know the SL for B, and because I'm basically taking an integral of B to get A, and if I treat A as B, I will be able to get SL for A by going backwards, I actually get 5 variables total from 1 equation; not only that, fully optimized in risk reward.
DislikedThat means any given position can be considered an A with the purpose of setting a reentry B, or can be considered a B, to set an SL, or multiple entries can be combined to be treated as an ephemeral position and acted upon accordingly.
DislikedThere are 4 variables and I can determine the other 3 anytime one is given to me. I can even calculate the phantom 5th variable.
Var 1) Lot size X
Var 2) A distance to B
Var 3) Lot size Y
Var 4) B distance to SL
Phantom Var 5) SL point of A
DislikedI regularly spank out 600+ pips a week, but for some reason, "experts" who do 100 pips a month can charge 2K per class and people jam pack them. I've done almost 10000 pips in a month before, but the fact i don't have a morgan stanley name card somehow makes me not an expert. it's strange to me that results don't say squat nowadays, but somehow, a fancy business card and an mba from some ivy league school is suppose to.Ignored
DislikedFirst I was going to say that it's really strange that I ran into this thread today. I just began to think of this same idea 2 nights ago. I thought of this same general concept, not with all the complex mathmatical equations tied in with this thread but the basic logic behind it.
First question is do you have a live account or a demo? Demos don't mean anything because as far as I'm concerned regardless of how strong someones psychological will power is, a demo will be traded differently that a live account at some given point.
If you are...Ignored