Kang Gun Relative Strength trading - the EA's | Page 42 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Trading system using relative strength 2,816 replies

Trading System Using Relative Strength-Part 2 1,499 replies

Updated CCFp and CFP indis for relative strength trading 55 replies

Relative Strength Basket Trading System 3,479 replies

Dyekid217 Trading relative strength and CICR 0 replies

Attachments: Kang Gun Relative Strength trading - the EA's
Exit Attachments

Kang Gun Relative Strength trading - the EA's

  • #821
  • Sep 21, 2009 10:49pm Sep 21, 2009 10:49pm
Well done Steve! After all the slogging it was worth it. You deserve it for the hard work you have put in.

Vinesh
  • #822
  • Sep 21, 2009 11:25pm Sep 21, 2009 11:25pm
Congrats Steve, for your efforts and you patience.
  • #823
  • Sep 22, 2009 5:43am Sep 22, 2009 5:43am
Quoting sundog
Congrats Steve, for your efforts and you patience.
All of us who have been part of the development process for nearly a year have played our part. I did the coding, granted, but most of the ideas came from others. I could not have done this alone.

  • #824
  • Sep 22, 2009 9:27am Sep 22, 2009 9:27am
Quoting SteveHopwood
I made the deposit at the end of Feb, but the 7 months it has taken to double the account contains a number of blunders, software errors and wrong turns.

These are well documented in earlier posts here. It is probably more useful to know that the account has risen by $119.57 in the last month, or 34.88% of its balance a month ago.

Hehe. In the time it took me to: go back and populate the history tab with the trades for the last month; drag the profit percentage script onto the screen; note the details and post them here; go back to the history...
Thanks, Steve. I am about to go live with your latest version because it has gone up 22% in balance in 12 days. 11% currently in equity in same time frame. Of course, that is up and down too. Looks great. I will report at the end of a month on latest version of the Range Trader.

Misterpipster
  • #825
  • Sep 22, 2009 9:47am Sep 22, 2009 9:47am
Steve,
Re: MM
You have coded and recommended .01 lots/100 unit currency. And again you have given option of letting the EA decide the size of lots to be traded. Now if I understand correctly BOTH are MM fields. Am I right? So far I have not let EA decide the size. But If I were to do it what would be the % of balance it'll trade?
Wont it be same?

Vinesh
  • #826
  • Sep 22, 2009 9:49am Sep 22, 2009 9:49am
Quoting misterpipster
Thanks, Steve. I am about to go live with your latest version because it has gone up 22% in balance in 12 days. 11% currently in equity in same time frame. Of course, that is up and down too. Looks great. I will report at the end of a month on latest version of the Range Trader.

Misterpipster
Good luck. Keep the risk low is the secret, allowing the profits to rack up by taking a little, but often.

That and remembering to be patient sometimes, and not close down those stuck baskets unless you get to the point where the balance has increased so much that they can be closed painlessly.

  • #827
  • Sep 22, 2009 10:04am Sep 22, 2009 10:04am
Quoting vinesh
Steve,
Re: MM
You have coded and recommended .01 lots/100 unit currency. And again you have given option of letting the EA decide the size of lots to be traded. Now if I understand correctly BOTH are MM fields. Am I right? So far I have not let EA decide the size. But If I were to do it what would be the % of balance it'll trade?
Wont it be same?

Vinesh
Sorry Vinesh, I do not understand the question.

  • #828
  • Sep 22, 2009 10:09am Sep 22, 2009 10:09am
Steve,
.01/$100= 1% risk approx.(depending on how many pairs EA trades in a basket).
What is the difference if I were to let EA decide the size of the pairs in a basket?
I hope this clarifies my question.
Vinesh
  • #829
  • Sep 22, 2009 10:34am Sep 22, 2009 10:34am
Quoting vinesh
Steve,
.01/$100= 1% risk approx.(depending on how many pairs EA trades in a basket).
What is the difference if I were to let EA decide the size of the pairs in a basket?
I hope this clarifies my question.
Vinesh
No idea. Sorry.

  • #830
  • Sep 24, 2009 6:13am Sep 24, 2009 6:13am
Hello Steve,
only cosmetic - please can you remove space above text? See attached image.
Thank you, I have small monitor
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: kg.JPG Size: 35 KB
Pavel
  • #831
  • Sep 24, 2009 6:18am Sep 24, 2009 6:18am
Quoting maya007
Hello Steve,
only cosmetic - please can you remove space above text? See attached image.
Thank you, I have small monitor
I would love to because it drives me nuts as well. Thing is, I have no idea what creates it - doesn't happen with any of my other robots.

If any coder can spot what causes this, there are probably a fair few of us who would appreciate it.

  • #832
  • Sep 30, 2009 7:21pm Sep 30, 2009 7:21pm
Hi Kang Gun and Steve,

You guys have made a great thing in Forex trading.
I salute you.

Keep up the good work.


To KG : salam kenal Kang

regards,
ronald
  • #833
  • Oct 3, 2009 5:31pm Oct 3, 2009 5:31pm
It seems to have gone quiet here at the mo. is it that the indicators, ea and theory have completed their testing?
  • #834
  • Oct 4, 2009 4:39am Oct 4, 2009 4:39am
Quoting amr10000
It seems to have gone quiet here at the mo. is it that the indicators, ea and theory have completed their testing?
Looks that way. KG started his original thread in early last November; that thread followed on from the work others had already done using relative strength to trigger trades, but using the fantastic indi KG had developed. I started work on the robots soon after.

I and others are using the Range trading method with fantastic success. Others are using the Daily Cross. I don't know of anybody using the Original trading method, so perhaps anyone doing so could post here about their experiences.

I see no further development to be done, but you never know when someone might come up with another bright idea. Some seriously fertile minds contributed their thoughts to the developments here; the result has been a crashing success.

  • #835
  • Oct 4, 2009 9:46am Oct 4, 2009 9:46am
Steve, do you trade v2 with all settings on default? If not, which ones do you change, and why? Please give us some added insight into how you approach this if it differs from the defaults. Thanks for all your work on this, and to all the other participants as well!
" Average traders look to the left, great traders look to the right."
  • #836
  • Oct 4, 2009 3:48pm Oct 4, 2009 3:48pm
Quoting ronaldwirawa
Hi Kang Gun and Steve,

You guys have made a great thing in Forex trading.
I salute you.

Keep up the good work.


To KG : salam kenal Kang

regards,
ronald
Welcome. I hope you are successful.

  • #837
  • Oct 4, 2009 3:52pm Oct 4, 2009 3:52pm
Quoting magicchance
Steve, do you trade v2 with all settings on default? If not, which ones do you change, and why? Please give us some added insight into how you approach this if it differs from the defaults. Thanks for all your work on this, and to all the other participants as well!
Welcome to you, too.

I am sorry, but I will not answer this question. When you understand the systems, you will not need to ask it. Until you understand the systems you cannot trade the robots.

Good luck. Have fun. Learn. The rest of us had to.

  • #838
  • Oct 4, 2009 3:59pm Oct 4, 2009 3:59pm
That's hardly a fair reply Steve, unless you first ask what I've done so far with your system, and you didn't. You just assumed I skipped right to the last page.

But I have read at least 100 postings of both the original Kang Gun thread as well as yours here. At least 200 postings in all, and I've added your instruments and template to my platform too.

If you would rather answer my post in private that's always a possibility, but don't just insult someone that dedicated several hours of background study before leaving their first post. You've seen me around these boards Steve, you know I don't act like that.
" Average traders look to the left, great traders look to the right."
  • #839
  • Oct 4, 2009 4:20pm Oct 4, 2009 4:20pm
Quoting magicchance
That's hardly a fair reply Steve, unless you first ask what I've done so far with your system, and you didn't. You just assumed I skipped right to the last page.

But I have read at least 100 postings of both the original Kang Gun thread as well as yours here. At least 200 postings in all, and I've added your instruments and template to my platform too.

If you would rather answer my post in private that's always a possibility, but don't just insult someone that dedicated several hours of background study before leaving their first post....
It is up to you whether you do the work required to succeed here or not. 'Several hours of background study' does not even begin to come close to this. Frankly, I put several hundred hours into developing the robots. The idea that 'Several hours of background study' will get an individual anywhere with all this would be comical if it were not so dangerous.

Sorry. I am being cruel to be kind. Please trust me; I know what I am talking about here. These robots will kill your accounts if you do not know what you are doing. i cannot transfer this knowledge and experience into you by virtue of either osmosis or a setfile. Unless you know what you are doing, you will blow your account.

I read this kind of reply in threads during my early times failing to trade Forex successfully and thought, "What an arrogant so-and-so." I understand now why the poster wrote thus.

As I said before: good luck; have fun; learn. Especially learn. 'Tis up to you.

  • #840
  • Oct 4, 2009 4:38pm Oct 4, 2009 4:38pm
Be that as it may, it still doesn't explain why you can't answer my post. I was asking for your added insight; why you trade the system the way you do. Everything else you alluded to is pure negative transferance and had no part in my question.

Your "hundreds of hours" (in which I have no doubt!) was as a system developer. That in no way relates to the student. To force someone, by ignoring their questions and comments, to backtrack over 100% of your defunct notes and changes over the past 10 months in order to sift the good from the bad is the very definition of arrogance (your word, not mine.) A teacher should be willing to sort out the chaff and present only what is good and valid about what it is they are presenting.

Maybe this is a better example: In the programming section, when you are asked for help do you say, "Hey, I would like to help you, but first you must show me that you have the same number of programing hours that I do." No, you don't. No one does. It's a rediculous premise, yet it's one you insist on here.
" Average traders look to the left, great traders look to the right."
0 traders viewing now